SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
EPA head Scott Pruitt, who has publicly questioned the science of global warming, took pains to frame President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Paris accord as something done in the interest of the environment. (Screenshot: White House)
Scott Pruitt, head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), tried on Friday to defend President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement by selectively quoting from "the environmental left," which at times criticized the deal for not going far enough.
Mentioning both the Sierra Club and noted former NASA climate scientist James Hansen by name, Pruitt falsely claimed that they opposed the deal "largely because it didn't hold nations like China and India accountable."
Responding to the press conference as it unfolded, the Sierra Club tweeted: "The Sierra Club fully supports the Paris Agreement. Scott Pruitt is a liar."
Others chimed in:
\u201cPruitt just claimed the @SierraClub dissed the Paris Accords. It didn't. It called the agreement "A turning point for humanity". #factcheck\u201d— Simon Marks (@Simon Marks) 1496425782
Meanwhile, Pruitt, who has publicly questioned the science of global warming and who since taking office has systemically deconstructed many of the United States' environmental regulations and protections, took pains to frame Trump's withdrawal from the global accord as something done in the interest of the environment.
"Truly," Pruitt said, "Paris at its core was a bunch of words committed to very minimal environmental benefits."
After, when asked by a reporter if Trump believes that "climate change is real and a threat to the United States," Pruitt said that his personal beliefs were not germane to the discussions he had with the president about the accord.
He said that the president was "focused on" whether the agreement "impacted us economically and whether good environmental objectives were achieved as a result of Paris. His decision was no, and that was our discussion."
Pruitt also took fire from critics for citing the much-derided New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, a known "climate-change denier and an incendiary Islamophobe," in defense of the Paris withdrawal.
In a statement following the press briefing, Sierra Club's Global Climate Policy director John Coequyt said that Pruitt is "clearly scrambling to explain the unexplainable" amid the "firestorm of criticism about Trump's historic mistake to pull out of the Paris Agreement."
"Pruitt's incoherent distortions of reality offer no good reasons why the Trump Administration would turn its back on the vast majorities of the public that support the Paris Agreement because there are no good reasons. Pruitt is learning that the hard way," Coequyt said, adding that he and Trump are now "complicit in endangering our families and our future by making this historic mistake just to boost the profits of a few corporate polluters."
Taking the podium after Pruitt, White House press secretary Sean Spicer also dodged questions about Trump's beliefs regarding climate change. "You say you haven't discussed climate change with the president," one reporter asked. "Can you have that discussion?" Spicer responded: "I will try."
\u201cSpicer says he hasn't had the chance to find out if Trump, WHO JUST WITHDREW FROM A GLOBAL CLIMATE DEAL, believes climate change is real\u201d— David Mack (@David Mack) 1496425412
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Scott Pruitt, head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), tried on Friday to defend President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement by selectively quoting from "the environmental left," which at times criticized the deal for not going far enough.
Mentioning both the Sierra Club and noted former NASA climate scientist James Hansen by name, Pruitt falsely claimed that they opposed the deal "largely because it didn't hold nations like China and India accountable."
Responding to the press conference as it unfolded, the Sierra Club tweeted: "The Sierra Club fully supports the Paris Agreement. Scott Pruitt is a liar."
Others chimed in:
\u201cPruitt just claimed the @SierraClub dissed the Paris Accords. It didn't. It called the agreement "A turning point for humanity". #factcheck\u201d— Simon Marks (@Simon Marks) 1496425782
Meanwhile, Pruitt, who has publicly questioned the science of global warming and who since taking office has systemically deconstructed many of the United States' environmental regulations and protections, took pains to frame Trump's withdrawal from the global accord as something done in the interest of the environment.
"Truly," Pruitt said, "Paris at its core was a bunch of words committed to very minimal environmental benefits."
After, when asked by a reporter if Trump believes that "climate change is real and a threat to the United States," Pruitt said that his personal beliefs were not germane to the discussions he had with the president about the accord.
He said that the president was "focused on" whether the agreement "impacted us economically and whether good environmental objectives were achieved as a result of Paris. His decision was no, and that was our discussion."
Pruitt also took fire from critics for citing the much-derided New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, a known "climate-change denier and an incendiary Islamophobe," in defense of the Paris withdrawal.
In a statement following the press briefing, Sierra Club's Global Climate Policy director John Coequyt said that Pruitt is "clearly scrambling to explain the unexplainable" amid the "firestorm of criticism about Trump's historic mistake to pull out of the Paris Agreement."
"Pruitt's incoherent distortions of reality offer no good reasons why the Trump Administration would turn its back on the vast majorities of the public that support the Paris Agreement because there are no good reasons. Pruitt is learning that the hard way," Coequyt said, adding that he and Trump are now "complicit in endangering our families and our future by making this historic mistake just to boost the profits of a few corporate polluters."
Taking the podium after Pruitt, White House press secretary Sean Spicer also dodged questions about Trump's beliefs regarding climate change. "You say you haven't discussed climate change with the president," one reporter asked. "Can you have that discussion?" Spicer responded: "I will try."
\u201cSpicer says he hasn't had the chance to find out if Trump, WHO JUST WITHDREW FROM A GLOBAL CLIMATE DEAL, believes climate change is real\u201d— David Mack (@David Mack) 1496425412
Scott Pruitt, head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), tried on Friday to defend President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement by selectively quoting from "the environmental left," which at times criticized the deal for not going far enough.
Mentioning both the Sierra Club and noted former NASA climate scientist James Hansen by name, Pruitt falsely claimed that they opposed the deal "largely because it didn't hold nations like China and India accountable."
Responding to the press conference as it unfolded, the Sierra Club tweeted: "The Sierra Club fully supports the Paris Agreement. Scott Pruitt is a liar."
Others chimed in:
\u201cPruitt just claimed the @SierraClub dissed the Paris Accords. It didn't. It called the agreement "A turning point for humanity". #factcheck\u201d— Simon Marks (@Simon Marks) 1496425782
Meanwhile, Pruitt, who has publicly questioned the science of global warming and who since taking office has systemically deconstructed many of the United States' environmental regulations and protections, took pains to frame Trump's withdrawal from the global accord as something done in the interest of the environment.
"Truly," Pruitt said, "Paris at its core was a bunch of words committed to very minimal environmental benefits."
After, when asked by a reporter if Trump believes that "climate change is real and a threat to the United States," Pruitt said that his personal beliefs were not germane to the discussions he had with the president about the accord.
He said that the president was "focused on" whether the agreement "impacted us economically and whether good environmental objectives were achieved as a result of Paris. His decision was no, and that was our discussion."
Pruitt also took fire from critics for citing the much-derided New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, a known "climate-change denier and an incendiary Islamophobe," in defense of the Paris withdrawal.
In a statement following the press briefing, Sierra Club's Global Climate Policy director John Coequyt said that Pruitt is "clearly scrambling to explain the unexplainable" amid the "firestorm of criticism about Trump's historic mistake to pull out of the Paris Agreement."
"Pruitt's incoherent distortions of reality offer no good reasons why the Trump Administration would turn its back on the vast majorities of the public that support the Paris Agreement because there are no good reasons. Pruitt is learning that the hard way," Coequyt said, adding that he and Trump are now "complicit in endangering our families and our future by making this historic mistake just to boost the profits of a few corporate polluters."
Taking the podium after Pruitt, White House press secretary Sean Spicer also dodged questions about Trump's beliefs regarding climate change. "You say you haven't discussed climate change with the president," one reporter asked. "Can you have that discussion?" Spicer responded: "I will try."
\u201cSpicer says he hasn't had the chance to find out if Trump, WHO JUST WITHDREW FROM A GLOBAL CLIMATE DEAL, believes climate change is real\u201d— David Mack (@David Mack) 1496425412