
EPA head Scott Pruitt, who has publicly questioned the science of global warming, took pains to frame President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Paris accord as something done in the interest of the environment. (Screenshot: White House)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
EPA head Scott Pruitt, who has publicly questioned the science of global warming, took pains to frame President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Paris accord as something done in the interest of the environment. (Screenshot: White House)
Scott Pruitt, head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), tried on Friday to defend President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement by selectively quoting from "the environmental left," which at times criticized the deal for not going far enough.
Mentioning both the Sierra Club and noted former NASA climate scientist James Hansen by name, Pruitt falsely claimed that they opposed the deal "largely because it didn't hold nations like China and India accountable."
Responding to the press conference as it unfolded, the Sierra Club tweeted: "The Sierra Club fully supports the Paris Agreement. Scott Pruitt is a liar."
Others chimed in:
\u201cPruitt just claimed the @SierraClub dissed the Paris Accords. It didn't. It called the agreement "A turning point for humanity". #factcheck\u201d— Simon Marks (@Simon Marks) 1496425782
Meanwhile, Pruitt, who has publicly questioned the science of global warming and who since taking office has systemically deconstructed many of the United States' environmental regulations and protections, took pains to frame Trump's withdrawal from the global accord as something done in the interest of the environment.
"Truly," Pruitt said, "Paris at its core was a bunch of words committed to very minimal environmental benefits."
After, when asked by a reporter if Trump believes that "climate change is real and a threat to the United States," Pruitt said that his personal beliefs were not germane to the discussions he had with the president about the accord.
He said that the president was "focused on" whether the agreement "impacted us economically and whether good environmental objectives were achieved as a result of Paris. His decision was no, and that was our discussion."
Pruitt also took fire from critics for citing the much-derided New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, a known "climate-change denier and an incendiary Islamophobe," in defense of the Paris withdrawal.
In a statement following the press briefing, Sierra Club's Global Climate Policy director John Coequyt said that Pruitt is "clearly scrambling to explain the unexplainable" amid the "firestorm of criticism about Trump's historic mistake to pull out of the Paris Agreement."
"Pruitt's incoherent distortions of reality offer no good reasons why the Trump Administration would turn its back on the vast majorities of the public that support the Paris Agreement because there are no good reasons. Pruitt is learning that the hard way," Coequyt said, adding that he and Trump are now "complicit in endangering our families and our future by making this historic mistake just to boost the profits of a few corporate polluters."
Taking the podium after Pruitt, White House press secretary Sean Spicer also dodged questions about Trump's beliefs regarding climate change. "You say you haven't discussed climate change with the president," one reporter asked. "Can you have that discussion?" Spicer responded: "I will try."
\u201cSpicer says he hasn't had the chance to find out if Trump, WHO JUST WITHDREW FROM A GLOBAL CLIMATE DEAL, believes climate change is real\u201d— David Mack (@David Mack) 1496425412
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Scott Pruitt, head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), tried on Friday to defend President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement by selectively quoting from "the environmental left," which at times criticized the deal for not going far enough.
Mentioning both the Sierra Club and noted former NASA climate scientist James Hansen by name, Pruitt falsely claimed that they opposed the deal "largely because it didn't hold nations like China and India accountable."
Responding to the press conference as it unfolded, the Sierra Club tweeted: "The Sierra Club fully supports the Paris Agreement. Scott Pruitt is a liar."
Others chimed in:
\u201cPruitt just claimed the @SierraClub dissed the Paris Accords. It didn't. It called the agreement "A turning point for humanity". #factcheck\u201d— Simon Marks (@Simon Marks) 1496425782
Meanwhile, Pruitt, who has publicly questioned the science of global warming and who since taking office has systemically deconstructed many of the United States' environmental regulations and protections, took pains to frame Trump's withdrawal from the global accord as something done in the interest of the environment.
"Truly," Pruitt said, "Paris at its core was a bunch of words committed to very minimal environmental benefits."
After, when asked by a reporter if Trump believes that "climate change is real and a threat to the United States," Pruitt said that his personal beliefs were not germane to the discussions he had with the president about the accord.
He said that the president was "focused on" whether the agreement "impacted us economically and whether good environmental objectives were achieved as a result of Paris. His decision was no, and that was our discussion."
Pruitt also took fire from critics for citing the much-derided New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, a known "climate-change denier and an incendiary Islamophobe," in defense of the Paris withdrawal.
In a statement following the press briefing, Sierra Club's Global Climate Policy director John Coequyt said that Pruitt is "clearly scrambling to explain the unexplainable" amid the "firestorm of criticism about Trump's historic mistake to pull out of the Paris Agreement."
"Pruitt's incoherent distortions of reality offer no good reasons why the Trump Administration would turn its back on the vast majorities of the public that support the Paris Agreement because there are no good reasons. Pruitt is learning that the hard way," Coequyt said, adding that he and Trump are now "complicit in endangering our families and our future by making this historic mistake just to boost the profits of a few corporate polluters."
Taking the podium after Pruitt, White House press secretary Sean Spicer also dodged questions about Trump's beliefs regarding climate change. "You say you haven't discussed climate change with the president," one reporter asked. "Can you have that discussion?" Spicer responded: "I will try."
\u201cSpicer says he hasn't had the chance to find out if Trump, WHO JUST WITHDREW FROM A GLOBAL CLIMATE DEAL, believes climate change is real\u201d— David Mack (@David Mack) 1496425412
Scott Pruitt, head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), tried on Friday to defend President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement by selectively quoting from "the environmental left," which at times criticized the deal for not going far enough.
Mentioning both the Sierra Club and noted former NASA climate scientist James Hansen by name, Pruitt falsely claimed that they opposed the deal "largely because it didn't hold nations like China and India accountable."
Responding to the press conference as it unfolded, the Sierra Club tweeted: "The Sierra Club fully supports the Paris Agreement. Scott Pruitt is a liar."
Others chimed in:
\u201cPruitt just claimed the @SierraClub dissed the Paris Accords. It didn't. It called the agreement "A turning point for humanity". #factcheck\u201d— Simon Marks (@Simon Marks) 1496425782
Meanwhile, Pruitt, who has publicly questioned the science of global warming and who since taking office has systemically deconstructed many of the United States' environmental regulations and protections, took pains to frame Trump's withdrawal from the global accord as something done in the interest of the environment.
"Truly," Pruitt said, "Paris at its core was a bunch of words committed to very minimal environmental benefits."
After, when asked by a reporter if Trump believes that "climate change is real and a threat to the United States," Pruitt said that his personal beliefs were not germane to the discussions he had with the president about the accord.
He said that the president was "focused on" whether the agreement "impacted us economically and whether good environmental objectives were achieved as a result of Paris. His decision was no, and that was our discussion."
Pruitt also took fire from critics for citing the much-derided New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, a known "climate-change denier and an incendiary Islamophobe," in defense of the Paris withdrawal.
In a statement following the press briefing, Sierra Club's Global Climate Policy director John Coequyt said that Pruitt is "clearly scrambling to explain the unexplainable" amid the "firestorm of criticism about Trump's historic mistake to pull out of the Paris Agreement."
"Pruitt's incoherent distortions of reality offer no good reasons why the Trump Administration would turn its back on the vast majorities of the public that support the Paris Agreement because there are no good reasons. Pruitt is learning that the hard way," Coequyt said, adding that he and Trump are now "complicit in endangering our families and our future by making this historic mistake just to boost the profits of a few corporate polluters."
Taking the podium after Pruitt, White House press secretary Sean Spicer also dodged questions about Trump's beliefs regarding climate change. "You say you haven't discussed climate change with the president," one reporter asked. "Can you have that discussion?" Spicer responded: "I will try."
\u201cSpicer says he hasn't had the chance to find out if Trump, WHO JUST WITHDREW FROM A GLOBAL CLIMATE DEAL, believes climate change is real\u201d— David Mack (@David Mack) 1496425412