SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Dems Ask Trump's Company to Prove It's Not Just Funneling Him Money
'It defies common sense to believe that this type of arrangement could credibly insulate the president from unending Emoluments Clause violations'
May 18, 2017
Senate Democrats said President Donald Trump's company could be "effectively a pass-through for income" that violates the Constitution's two Emoluments Clauses, and demanded that the Trump Organization hand over details about its operations since its chief took office.
In a letter (pdf) to the Trump Organization's new leadership, which includes First Sons Eric and Donald, Jr., over a dozen top Democrats raised "serious concerns" about whether Trump has broken the laws that prohibit elected officials from taking foreign funds and block the president from making additional money beyond what he is paid in office.
Trump's previous vows to put his assets in a blind trust and step away from the corporation "ring hollow" given Eric Trump's statements that he would update his father on the business "probably quarterly," the letter states. Other news reports have noted that Trump would have access to "net income or principal" from the trust at any time.
"If accurate, the president will receive regular updates on the ongoing affairs of his businesses and will be able to regularly access profits," the letter states. "It defies common sense to believe that this type of arrangement could credibly insulate the president from unending Emoluments Clause violations."
The senators, who include Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Dianne Feinstein of California, Ben Cardin of Maryland, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Sheldon Whitehouse and Jack Reed of Rhode Island, Al Franken of Minnesota, Chris Coons and Thomas Carper of Delaware, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey of Massachusetts, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Tom Udall of New Mexico, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon, urged the Trump Organization to answer a series of questions "as soon as possible."
Those questions include if the Trump Organization accounts for income from foreign governments or sources as separate from other sources, and how; if and how it reports benefits aside from income, such as permits or trademarks; what steps the organization has taken to ensure that none of the many LLCs that have bought Trump properties since the election have links to foreign governments; and what the estimated value is of the 38 Chinese trademarks recently awarded to the Trump Organization; among other inquiries.
Another question asks how the company determines whether a guest at the Washington, D.C., Trump Hotel is using foreign government funds, how it measures "profits" from individual guests, and whether the president has donated the money to the U.S. Treasury, as he vowed to do "apparently in the mistaken belief that this promise might meet the requirements of the Foreign Emoluments Clause."
The letter is not the first time suspicions have been raised over the legality of the president's corporate interests. The watchdog group Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW) filed a lawsuit in January that accused Trump of violating the Emoluments Clause. Earlier this week, artist Robin Bell projected the words "Pay Trump Bribes Here" onto the face of the D.C. hotel.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Senate Democrats said President Donald Trump's company could be "effectively a pass-through for income" that violates the Constitution's two Emoluments Clauses, and demanded that the Trump Organization hand over details about its operations since its chief took office.
In a letter (pdf) to the Trump Organization's new leadership, which includes First Sons Eric and Donald, Jr., over a dozen top Democrats raised "serious concerns" about whether Trump has broken the laws that prohibit elected officials from taking foreign funds and block the president from making additional money beyond what he is paid in office.
Trump's previous vows to put his assets in a blind trust and step away from the corporation "ring hollow" given Eric Trump's statements that he would update his father on the business "probably quarterly," the letter states. Other news reports have noted that Trump would have access to "net income or principal" from the trust at any time.
"If accurate, the president will receive regular updates on the ongoing affairs of his businesses and will be able to regularly access profits," the letter states. "It defies common sense to believe that this type of arrangement could credibly insulate the president from unending Emoluments Clause violations."
The senators, who include Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Dianne Feinstein of California, Ben Cardin of Maryland, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Sheldon Whitehouse and Jack Reed of Rhode Island, Al Franken of Minnesota, Chris Coons and Thomas Carper of Delaware, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey of Massachusetts, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Tom Udall of New Mexico, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon, urged the Trump Organization to answer a series of questions "as soon as possible."
Those questions include if the Trump Organization accounts for income from foreign governments or sources as separate from other sources, and how; if and how it reports benefits aside from income, such as permits or trademarks; what steps the organization has taken to ensure that none of the many LLCs that have bought Trump properties since the election have links to foreign governments; and what the estimated value is of the 38 Chinese trademarks recently awarded to the Trump Organization; among other inquiries.
Another question asks how the company determines whether a guest at the Washington, D.C., Trump Hotel is using foreign government funds, how it measures "profits" from individual guests, and whether the president has donated the money to the U.S. Treasury, as he vowed to do "apparently in the mistaken belief that this promise might meet the requirements of the Foreign Emoluments Clause."
The letter is not the first time suspicions have been raised over the legality of the president's corporate interests. The watchdog group Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW) filed a lawsuit in January that accused Trump of violating the Emoluments Clause. Earlier this week, artist Robin Bell projected the words "Pay Trump Bribes Here" onto the face of the D.C. hotel.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Senate Democrats said President Donald Trump's company could be "effectively a pass-through for income" that violates the Constitution's two Emoluments Clauses, and demanded that the Trump Organization hand over details about its operations since its chief took office.
In a letter (pdf) to the Trump Organization's new leadership, which includes First Sons Eric and Donald, Jr., over a dozen top Democrats raised "serious concerns" about whether Trump has broken the laws that prohibit elected officials from taking foreign funds and block the president from making additional money beyond what he is paid in office.
Trump's previous vows to put his assets in a blind trust and step away from the corporation "ring hollow" given Eric Trump's statements that he would update his father on the business "probably quarterly," the letter states. Other news reports have noted that Trump would have access to "net income or principal" from the trust at any time.
"If accurate, the president will receive regular updates on the ongoing affairs of his businesses and will be able to regularly access profits," the letter states. "It defies common sense to believe that this type of arrangement could credibly insulate the president from unending Emoluments Clause violations."
The senators, who include Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Dianne Feinstein of California, Ben Cardin of Maryland, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Sheldon Whitehouse and Jack Reed of Rhode Island, Al Franken of Minnesota, Chris Coons and Thomas Carper of Delaware, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey of Massachusetts, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Tom Udall of New Mexico, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon, urged the Trump Organization to answer a series of questions "as soon as possible."
Those questions include if the Trump Organization accounts for income from foreign governments or sources as separate from other sources, and how; if and how it reports benefits aside from income, such as permits or trademarks; what steps the organization has taken to ensure that none of the many LLCs that have bought Trump properties since the election have links to foreign governments; and what the estimated value is of the 38 Chinese trademarks recently awarded to the Trump Organization; among other inquiries.
Another question asks how the company determines whether a guest at the Washington, D.C., Trump Hotel is using foreign government funds, how it measures "profits" from individual guests, and whether the president has donated the money to the U.S. Treasury, as he vowed to do "apparently in the mistaken belief that this promise might meet the requirements of the Foreign Emoluments Clause."
The letter is not the first time suspicions have been raised over the legality of the president's corporate interests. The watchdog group Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW) filed a lawsuit in January that accused Trump of violating the Emoluments Clause. Earlier this week, artist Robin Bell projected the words "Pay Trump Bribes Here" onto the face of the D.C. hotel.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.