

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Women and allies gathered outside the U.S. Department of Labor on Wednesday, demanding fair wages, pay equity, paid leave, and labor rights while calling for an end to workplace violence and harassment.
The "Women Workers Rising" demonstration, organized by One Billion Rising in conjunction with a host of progressive labor and social justice groups, was set to feature appearances by Democratic U.S. Reps. Jan Schakowsky (Ill.), Pramila Jayapal (Wash.), Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), and Marcy Kaptur (Ohio).
It happened as part of International Women's Day, during which women around the world rallied, went on strike, and otherwise took action for equal rights. With its focus on labor rights, Women Workers Rising spoke directly to one of Wednesday's larger goals: building a "feminism for the 99 percent."
As Princeton University professor Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, among the authors of the initial call to strike, explained to journalist Sarah Jaffe last month:
At a very basic level, there is an understanding that the problems experienced by women in our societies today are rooted in an economic system that privileges the 1 percent over the 99 percent. Sometimes we think of women's issues unto themselves, but really these are issues that arise out of an inherently unequal economic arrangement in this country. The fact that women make less, that women don't have access to childcare provisions, that women don't have access to reproductive healthcare. They are not just economic questions, but they are related to an economic arrangement that relies on the free labor of women to, in fact, reproduce itself as a political system.
In some ways, people have really been talking about that with greater specificity and focus since the eruption of the Occupy movement in 2011, that within that context, those unequal economic relationships have a disproportionate effect on women's lives. I think that in this past election--where you literally have a billionaire who has made his money through exploiting loopholes in the system and who has sort of ascended to the political top through abusing women, visceral sexism and hatred of women--it is not surprising given the centrality of sexism in Donald Trump's campaign that the very first protests have been organized by women, mostly attended by women, that have become a focal point of the resistance movement.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Women and allies gathered outside the U.S. Department of Labor on Wednesday, demanding fair wages, pay equity, paid leave, and labor rights while calling for an end to workplace violence and harassment.
The "Women Workers Rising" demonstration, organized by One Billion Rising in conjunction with a host of progressive labor and social justice groups, was set to feature appearances by Democratic U.S. Reps. Jan Schakowsky (Ill.), Pramila Jayapal (Wash.), Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), and Marcy Kaptur (Ohio).
It happened as part of International Women's Day, during which women around the world rallied, went on strike, and otherwise took action for equal rights. With its focus on labor rights, Women Workers Rising spoke directly to one of Wednesday's larger goals: building a "feminism for the 99 percent."
As Princeton University professor Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, among the authors of the initial call to strike, explained to journalist Sarah Jaffe last month:
At a very basic level, there is an understanding that the problems experienced by women in our societies today are rooted in an economic system that privileges the 1 percent over the 99 percent. Sometimes we think of women's issues unto themselves, but really these are issues that arise out of an inherently unequal economic arrangement in this country. The fact that women make less, that women don't have access to childcare provisions, that women don't have access to reproductive healthcare. They are not just economic questions, but they are related to an economic arrangement that relies on the free labor of women to, in fact, reproduce itself as a political system.
In some ways, people have really been talking about that with greater specificity and focus since the eruption of the Occupy movement in 2011, that within that context, those unequal economic relationships have a disproportionate effect on women's lives. I think that in this past election--where you literally have a billionaire who has made his money through exploiting loopholes in the system and who has sort of ascended to the political top through abusing women, visceral sexism and hatred of women--it is not surprising given the centrality of sexism in Donald Trump's campaign that the very first protests have been organized by women, mostly attended by women, that have become a focal point of the resistance movement.
Women and allies gathered outside the U.S. Department of Labor on Wednesday, demanding fair wages, pay equity, paid leave, and labor rights while calling for an end to workplace violence and harassment.
The "Women Workers Rising" demonstration, organized by One Billion Rising in conjunction with a host of progressive labor and social justice groups, was set to feature appearances by Democratic U.S. Reps. Jan Schakowsky (Ill.), Pramila Jayapal (Wash.), Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), and Marcy Kaptur (Ohio).
It happened as part of International Women's Day, during which women around the world rallied, went on strike, and otherwise took action for equal rights. With its focus on labor rights, Women Workers Rising spoke directly to one of Wednesday's larger goals: building a "feminism for the 99 percent."
As Princeton University professor Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, among the authors of the initial call to strike, explained to journalist Sarah Jaffe last month:
At a very basic level, there is an understanding that the problems experienced by women in our societies today are rooted in an economic system that privileges the 1 percent over the 99 percent. Sometimes we think of women's issues unto themselves, but really these are issues that arise out of an inherently unequal economic arrangement in this country. The fact that women make less, that women don't have access to childcare provisions, that women don't have access to reproductive healthcare. They are not just economic questions, but they are related to an economic arrangement that relies on the free labor of women to, in fact, reproduce itself as a political system.
In some ways, people have really been talking about that with greater specificity and focus since the eruption of the Occupy movement in 2011, that within that context, those unequal economic relationships have a disproportionate effect on women's lives. I think that in this past election--where you literally have a billionaire who has made his money through exploiting loopholes in the system and who has sort of ascended to the political top through abusing women, visceral sexism and hatred of women--it is not surprising given the centrality of sexism in Donald Trump's campaign that the very first protests have been organized by women, mostly attended by women, that have become a focal point of the resistance movement.