
Many schools are explicitly targeting members of the military, whose recruits tend to be poorer than the general population, for their own profits. (Photo: Getty Images)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Many schools are explicitly targeting members of the military, whose recruits tend to be poorer than the general population, for their own profits. (Photo: Getty Images)
Nearly 200 for-profit colleges around the country are skirting federal law, a report released last week by the Department of Education finds, by targeting U.S. military veterans for their G.I. bill tuition funds.
Federal law requires that for-profit schools abide by a 90/10 funding ratio, meaning that federal funds must account for no more than 90 percent of the school's income, and 10 percent must be derived from other sources. But because the law doesn't count G.I. bill tuition payments as federal funds--the bill only explicitly counts Department of Education funding--private for-profit schools are able to use public money to fuel nearly all of their operations and profits.
Indeed, it seems many schools are explicitly targeting members of the military, whose recruits tend to be poorer than the general population, for their own profits.
"Some of the worst actors don't even pretend they're not targeting veterans as a source of income," said Will Hubbard, vice president of government affairs at Student Veterans of America, to Stars and Stripes. "These schools say they're chosen by veterans. And the numbers show that isn't the case. It's undeniable at this point."
The problem has existed for years. And despite even a 2012 executive order from President Barack Obama intended to cut down on deceptive marketing to veterans, because of the loophole many dubious institutions continue to directly target veterans for their G.I. bill money.
Holly Petraeus, assistant director for servicemember affairs at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, observed back in 2011 that the loophole "gives for-profit colleges an incentive to see service members as nothing more than dollar signs in uniform, and to use aggressive marketing to draw them in and take out private loans, which students often need because the federal grants are insufficient to cover the full cost of tuition and related expenses."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Nearly 200 for-profit colleges around the country are skirting federal law, a report released last week by the Department of Education finds, by targeting U.S. military veterans for their G.I. bill tuition funds.
Federal law requires that for-profit schools abide by a 90/10 funding ratio, meaning that federal funds must account for no more than 90 percent of the school's income, and 10 percent must be derived from other sources. But because the law doesn't count G.I. bill tuition payments as federal funds--the bill only explicitly counts Department of Education funding--private for-profit schools are able to use public money to fuel nearly all of their operations and profits.
Indeed, it seems many schools are explicitly targeting members of the military, whose recruits tend to be poorer than the general population, for their own profits.
"Some of the worst actors don't even pretend they're not targeting veterans as a source of income," said Will Hubbard, vice president of government affairs at Student Veterans of America, to Stars and Stripes. "These schools say they're chosen by veterans. And the numbers show that isn't the case. It's undeniable at this point."
The problem has existed for years. And despite even a 2012 executive order from President Barack Obama intended to cut down on deceptive marketing to veterans, because of the loophole many dubious institutions continue to directly target veterans for their G.I. bill money.
Holly Petraeus, assistant director for servicemember affairs at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, observed back in 2011 that the loophole "gives for-profit colleges an incentive to see service members as nothing more than dollar signs in uniform, and to use aggressive marketing to draw them in and take out private loans, which students often need because the federal grants are insufficient to cover the full cost of tuition and related expenses."
Nearly 200 for-profit colleges around the country are skirting federal law, a report released last week by the Department of Education finds, by targeting U.S. military veterans for their G.I. bill tuition funds.
Federal law requires that for-profit schools abide by a 90/10 funding ratio, meaning that federal funds must account for no more than 90 percent of the school's income, and 10 percent must be derived from other sources. But because the law doesn't count G.I. bill tuition payments as federal funds--the bill only explicitly counts Department of Education funding--private for-profit schools are able to use public money to fuel nearly all of their operations and profits.
Indeed, it seems many schools are explicitly targeting members of the military, whose recruits tend to be poorer than the general population, for their own profits.
"Some of the worst actors don't even pretend they're not targeting veterans as a source of income," said Will Hubbard, vice president of government affairs at Student Veterans of America, to Stars and Stripes. "These schools say they're chosen by veterans. And the numbers show that isn't the case. It's undeniable at this point."
The problem has existed for years. And despite even a 2012 executive order from President Barack Obama intended to cut down on deceptive marketing to veterans, because of the loophole many dubious institutions continue to directly target veterans for their G.I. bill money.
Holly Petraeus, assistant director for servicemember affairs at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, observed back in 2011 that the loophole "gives for-profit colleges an incentive to see service members as nothing more than dollar signs in uniform, and to use aggressive marketing to draw them in and take out private loans, which students often need because the federal grants are insufficient to cover the full cost of tuition and related expenses."