
Many schools are explicitly targeting members of the military, whose recruits tend to be poorer than the general population, for their own profits. (Photo: Getty Images)
For-Profit Schools See Veterans as 'Nothing More Than Dollar Signs in Uniform'
A new report from the Department of Education shows that nearly 200 colleges are profiting from a legal loophole that allows them to target veterans for G.I. bill money
Nearly 200 for-profit colleges around the country are skirting federal law, a report released last week by the Department of Education finds, by targeting U.S. military veterans for their G.I. bill tuition funds.
Federal law requires that for-profit schools abide by a 90/10 funding ratio, meaning that federal funds must account for no more than 90 percent of the school's income, and 10 percent must be derived from other sources. But because the law doesn't count G.I. bill tuition payments as federal funds--the bill only explicitly counts Department of Education funding--private for-profit schools are able to use public money to fuel nearly all of their operations and profits.
Indeed, it seems many schools are explicitly targeting members of the military, whose recruits tend to be poorer than the general population, for their own profits.
"Some of the worst actors don't even pretend they're not targeting veterans as a source of income," said Will Hubbard, vice president of government affairs at Student Veterans of America, to Stars and Stripes. "These schools say they're chosen by veterans. And the numbers show that isn't the case. It's undeniable at this point."
The problem has existed for years. And despite even a 2012 executive order from President Barack Obama intended to cut down on deceptive marketing to veterans, because of the loophole many dubious institutions continue to directly target veterans for their G.I. bill money.
Holly Petraeus, assistant director for servicemember affairs at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, observed back in 2011 that the loophole "gives for-profit colleges an incentive to see service members as nothing more than dollar signs in uniform, and to use aggressive marketing to draw them in and take out private loans, which students often need because the federal grants are insufficient to cover the full cost of tuition and related expenses."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Nearly 200 for-profit colleges around the country are skirting federal law, a report released last week by the Department of Education finds, by targeting U.S. military veterans for their G.I. bill tuition funds.
Federal law requires that for-profit schools abide by a 90/10 funding ratio, meaning that federal funds must account for no more than 90 percent of the school's income, and 10 percent must be derived from other sources. But because the law doesn't count G.I. bill tuition payments as federal funds--the bill only explicitly counts Department of Education funding--private for-profit schools are able to use public money to fuel nearly all of their operations and profits.
Indeed, it seems many schools are explicitly targeting members of the military, whose recruits tend to be poorer than the general population, for their own profits.
"Some of the worst actors don't even pretend they're not targeting veterans as a source of income," said Will Hubbard, vice president of government affairs at Student Veterans of America, to Stars and Stripes. "These schools say they're chosen by veterans. And the numbers show that isn't the case. It's undeniable at this point."
The problem has existed for years. And despite even a 2012 executive order from President Barack Obama intended to cut down on deceptive marketing to veterans, because of the loophole many dubious institutions continue to directly target veterans for their G.I. bill money.
Holly Petraeus, assistant director for servicemember affairs at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, observed back in 2011 that the loophole "gives for-profit colleges an incentive to see service members as nothing more than dollar signs in uniform, and to use aggressive marketing to draw them in and take out private loans, which students often need because the federal grants are insufficient to cover the full cost of tuition and related expenses."
Nearly 200 for-profit colleges around the country are skirting federal law, a report released last week by the Department of Education finds, by targeting U.S. military veterans for their G.I. bill tuition funds.
Federal law requires that for-profit schools abide by a 90/10 funding ratio, meaning that federal funds must account for no more than 90 percent of the school's income, and 10 percent must be derived from other sources. But because the law doesn't count G.I. bill tuition payments as federal funds--the bill only explicitly counts Department of Education funding--private for-profit schools are able to use public money to fuel nearly all of their operations and profits.
Indeed, it seems many schools are explicitly targeting members of the military, whose recruits tend to be poorer than the general population, for their own profits.
"Some of the worst actors don't even pretend they're not targeting veterans as a source of income," said Will Hubbard, vice president of government affairs at Student Veterans of America, to Stars and Stripes. "These schools say they're chosen by veterans. And the numbers show that isn't the case. It's undeniable at this point."
The problem has existed for years. And despite even a 2012 executive order from President Barack Obama intended to cut down on deceptive marketing to veterans, because of the loophole many dubious institutions continue to directly target veterans for their G.I. bill money.
Holly Petraeus, assistant director for servicemember affairs at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, observed back in 2011 that the loophole "gives for-profit colleges an incentive to see service members as nothing more than dollar signs in uniform, and to use aggressive marketing to draw them in and take out private loans, which students often need because the federal grants are insufficient to cover the full cost of tuition and related expenses."