DOJ Bestows 'Early Christmas Present' to Financial Giant Deutsche Bank
'Some folks are going to prison, right? Oh wait, that's just in the movies.'
German lender Deutsche Bank "got off easy" on Friday, having reached a $7.2 billion settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) over sales of mortgage-backed securities that fueled the financial crisis.
Of the $7.2 billion, just $3.1 billion is a cash penalty--the remaining $4.1 billion, economist Yves Smith explained at Naked Capitalism, is "promised 'consumer relief' as in 'stuff maybe we'll do in the future.'" Regardless, the amount is far less than the $14 billion originally requested by DOJ investigators.
"For Deutsche it was certainly quite positive" because the hit to capital is "modest," Kyle Kloc, a portfolio manager at Fisch Asset Management in Zurich who holds Deutsche Bank bonds, told Bloomberg. Supporting that assessment was the news that the bank's shares rose on Friday following the announcement.
Indeed, investigative journalist Nomi Prins described the settlement as an "early Christmas present" for the bank, while reporter and author David Dayen--who has written extensively on the mortgage crisis--blasted the deal in a series of tweets.
Among other things, Dayen criticized a spineless DOJ, pointing out that "this is the same crappy settlement they've done w/every bank." The "DOJ has changed norms," he said, "by turning these dumb settlements into a substitute for accountability."
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) also took to Twitter to denounce the deal as "weak" and reiterate the perennial call for crooked bankers to see jail time.
Meanwhile, many have noted that the Deutsche Bank settlement potentially "heads off" a major conflict of interest with President-elect Donald Trump--"whose businesses," the Washington Post writes, "have borrowed more than $300 million from the troubled German bank."
Still, not everyone's concerns have been assuaged.
"Despite this settlement, the criminal investigation of Deutsche Bank and culpable individuals must continue--and it should be done by independent counsel," Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) told ABC News. "Only an independent counsel can investigate and prosecute vigorously and impartially, in light of conflicts of interest created by the enormous debt owed by Donald Trump to the bank."
Also announced Friday were a settlement with Credit Suisse, also over toxic debt, as well as a DOJ lawsuit against British banking giant Barclays over similar misconduct. "Barclays jeopardized billions of dollars of wealth through practices that were plainly irresponsible and dishonest," U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch said in a statement. "With this filing, we are sending a clear message that the Department of Justice will not tolerate the defrauding of investors and the American people."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
German lender Deutsche Bank "got off easy" on Friday, having reached a $7.2 billion settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) over sales of mortgage-backed securities that fueled the financial crisis.
Of the $7.2 billion, just $3.1 billion is a cash penalty--the remaining $4.1 billion, economist Yves Smith explained at Naked Capitalism, is "promised 'consumer relief' as in 'stuff maybe we'll do in the future.'" Regardless, the amount is far less than the $14 billion originally requested by DOJ investigators.
"For Deutsche it was certainly quite positive" because the hit to capital is "modest," Kyle Kloc, a portfolio manager at Fisch Asset Management in Zurich who holds Deutsche Bank bonds, told Bloomberg. Supporting that assessment was the news that the bank's shares rose on Friday following the announcement.
Indeed, investigative journalist Nomi Prins described the settlement as an "early Christmas present" for the bank, while reporter and author David Dayen--who has written extensively on the mortgage crisis--blasted the deal in a series of tweets.
Among other things, Dayen criticized a spineless DOJ, pointing out that "this is the same crappy settlement they've done w/every bank." The "DOJ has changed norms," he said, "by turning these dumb settlements into a substitute for accountability."
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) also took to Twitter to denounce the deal as "weak" and reiterate the perennial call for crooked bankers to see jail time.
Meanwhile, many have noted that the Deutsche Bank settlement potentially "heads off" a major conflict of interest with President-elect Donald Trump--"whose businesses," the Washington Post writes, "have borrowed more than $300 million from the troubled German bank."
Still, not everyone's concerns have been assuaged.
"Despite this settlement, the criminal investigation of Deutsche Bank and culpable individuals must continue--and it should be done by independent counsel," Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) told ABC News. "Only an independent counsel can investigate and prosecute vigorously and impartially, in light of conflicts of interest created by the enormous debt owed by Donald Trump to the bank."
Also announced Friday were a settlement with Credit Suisse, also over toxic debt, as well as a DOJ lawsuit against British banking giant Barclays over similar misconduct. "Barclays jeopardized billions of dollars of wealth through practices that were plainly irresponsible and dishonest," U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch said in a statement. "With this filing, we are sending a clear message that the Department of Justice will not tolerate the defrauding of investors and the American people."
German lender Deutsche Bank "got off easy" on Friday, having reached a $7.2 billion settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) over sales of mortgage-backed securities that fueled the financial crisis.
Of the $7.2 billion, just $3.1 billion is a cash penalty--the remaining $4.1 billion, economist Yves Smith explained at Naked Capitalism, is "promised 'consumer relief' as in 'stuff maybe we'll do in the future.'" Regardless, the amount is far less than the $14 billion originally requested by DOJ investigators.
"For Deutsche it was certainly quite positive" because the hit to capital is "modest," Kyle Kloc, a portfolio manager at Fisch Asset Management in Zurich who holds Deutsche Bank bonds, told Bloomberg. Supporting that assessment was the news that the bank's shares rose on Friday following the announcement.
Indeed, investigative journalist Nomi Prins described the settlement as an "early Christmas present" for the bank, while reporter and author David Dayen--who has written extensively on the mortgage crisis--blasted the deal in a series of tweets.
Among other things, Dayen criticized a spineless DOJ, pointing out that "this is the same crappy settlement they've done w/every bank." The "DOJ has changed norms," he said, "by turning these dumb settlements into a substitute for accountability."
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) also took to Twitter to denounce the deal as "weak" and reiterate the perennial call for crooked bankers to see jail time.
Meanwhile, many have noted that the Deutsche Bank settlement potentially "heads off" a major conflict of interest with President-elect Donald Trump--"whose businesses," the Washington Post writes, "have borrowed more than $300 million from the troubled German bank."
Still, not everyone's concerns have been assuaged.
"Despite this settlement, the criminal investigation of Deutsche Bank and culpable individuals must continue--and it should be done by independent counsel," Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) told ABC News. "Only an independent counsel can investigate and prosecute vigorously and impartially, in light of conflicts of interest created by the enormous debt owed by Donald Trump to the bank."
Also announced Friday were a settlement with Credit Suisse, also over toxic debt, as well as a DOJ lawsuit against British banking giant Barclays over similar misconduct. "Barclays jeopardized billions of dollars of wealth through practices that were plainly irresponsible and dishonest," U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch said in a statement. "With this filing, we are sending a clear message that the Department of Justice will not tolerate the defrauding of investors and the American people."