One analyst described the settlement as "certainly quite positive" for German lender Deutsche Bank. (Photo: Metropolico.org/flickr/cc)
Dec 23, 2016
German lender Deutsche Bank "got off easy" on Friday, having reached a $7.2 billion settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) over sales of mortgage-backed securities that fueled the financial crisis.
Of the $7.2 billion, just $3.1 billion is a cash penalty--the remaining $4.1 billion, economist Yves Smith explained at Naked Capitalism, is "promised 'consumer relief' as in 'stuff maybe we'll do in the future.'" Regardless, the amount is far less than the $14 billion originally requested by DOJ investigators.
"For Deutsche it was certainly quite positive" because the hit to capital is "modest," Kyle Kloc, a portfolio manager at Fisch Asset Management in Zurich who holds Deutsche Bank bonds, toldBloomberg. Supporting that assessment was the news that the bank's shares rose on Friday following the announcement.
Indeed, investigative journalist Nomi Prins described the settlement as an "early Christmas present" for the bank, while reporter and author David Dayen--who has written extensively on the mortgage crisis--blasted the deal in a series of tweets.
Among other things, Dayen criticized a spineless DOJ, pointing out that "this is the same crappy settlement they've done w/every bank." The "DOJ has changed norms," he said, "by turning these dumb settlements into a substitute for accountability."
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) also took to Twitter to denounce the deal as "weak" and reiterate the perennial call for crooked bankers to see jail time.
\u201cLooks like another weak settlement by the Department of Justice. Some folks are going to prison, right? Oh wait, that's just in the movies. https://t.co/BIvxcbOH8X\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1482475249
Meanwhile, many have noted that the Deutsche Bank settlement potentially "heads off" a major conflict of interest with President-elect Donald Trump--"whose businesses," the Washington Postwrites, "have borrowed more than $300 million from the troubled German bank."
Still, not everyone's concerns have been assuaged.
"Despite this settlement, the criminal investigation of Deutsche Bank and culpable individuals must continue--and it should be done by independent counsel," Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) toldABC News. "Only an independent counsel can investigate and prosecute vigorously and impartially, in light of conflicts of interest created by the enormous debt owed by Donald Trump to the bank."
Also announced Friday were a settlement with Credit Suisse, also over toxic debt, as well as a DOJ lawsuit against British banking giant Barclays over similar misconduct. "Barclays jeopardized billions of dollars of wealth through practices that were plainly irresponsible and dishonest," U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch said in a statement. "With this filing, we are sending a clear message that the Department of Justice will not tolerate the defrauding of investors and the American people."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
German lender Deutsche Bank "got off easy" on Friday, having reached a $7.2 billion settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) over sales of mortgage-backed securities that fueled the financial crisis.
Of the $7.2 billion, just $3.1 billion is a cash penalty--the remaining $4.1 billion, economist Yves Smith explained at Naked Capitalism, is "promised 'consumer relief' as in 'stuff maybe we'll do in the future.'" Regardless, the amount is far less than the $14 billion originally requested by DOJ investigators.
"For Deutsche it was certainly quite positive" because the hit to capital is "modest," Kyle Kloc, a portfolio manager at Fisch Asset Management in Zurich who holds Deutsche Bank bonds, toldBloomberg. Supporting that assessment was the news that the bank's shares rose on Friday following the announcement.
Indeed, investigative journalist Nomi Prins described the settlement as an "early Christmas present" for the bank, while reporter and author David Dayen--who has written extensively on the mortgage crisis--blasted the deal in a series of tweets.
Among other things, Dayen criticized a spineless DOJ, pointing out that "this is the same crappy settlement they've done w/every bank." The "DOJ has changed norms," he said, "by turning these dumb settlements into a substitute for accountability."
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) also took to Twitter to denounce the deal as "weak" and reiterate the perennial call for crooked bankers to see jail time.
\u201cLooks like another weak settlement by the Department of Justice. Some folks are going to prison, right? Oh wait, that's just in the movies. https://t.co/BIvxcbOH8X\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1482475249
Meanwhile, many have noted that the Deutsche Bank settlement potentially "heads off" a major conflict of interest with President-elect Donald Trump--"whose businesses," the Washington Postwrites, "have borrowed more than $300 million from the troubled German bank."
Still, not everyone's concerns have been assuaged.
"Despite this settlement, the criminal investigation of Deutsche Bank and culpable individuals must continue--and it should be done by independent counsel," Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) toldABC News. "Only an independent counsel can investigate and prosecute vigorously and impartially, in light of conflicts of interest created by the enormous debt owed by Donald Trump to the bank."
Also announced Friday were a settlement with Credit Suisse, also over toxic debt, as well as a DOJ lawsuit against British banking giant Barclays over similar misconduct. "Barclays jeopardized billions of dollars of wealth through practices that were plainly irresponsible and dishonest," U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch said in a statement. "With this filing, we are sending a clear message that the Department of Justice will not tolerate the defrauding of investors and the American people."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
German lender Deutsche Bank "got off easy" on Friday, having reached a $7.2 billion settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) over sales of mortgage-backed securities that fueled the financial crisis.
Of the $7.2 billion, just $3.1 billion is a cash penalty--the remaining $4.1 billion, economist Yves Smith explained at Naked Capitalism, is "promised 'consumer relief' as in 'stuff maybe we'll do in the future.'" Regardless, the amount is far less than the $14 billion originally requested by DOJ investigators.
"For Deutsche it was certainly quite positive" because the hit to capital is "modest," Kyle Kloc, a portfolio manager at Fisch Asset Management in Zurich who holds Deutsche Bank bonds, toldBloomberg. Supporting that assessment was the news that the bank's shares rose on Friday following the announcement.
Indeed, investigative journalist Nomi Prins described the settlement as an "early Christmas present" for the bank, while reporter and author David Dayen--who has written extensively on the mortgage crisis--blasted the deal in a series of tweets.
Among other things, Dayen criticized a spineless DOJ, pointing out that "this is the same crappy settlement they've done w/every bank." The "DOJ has changed norms," he said, "by turning these dumb settlements into a substitute for accountability."
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) also took to Twitter to denounce the deal as "weak" and reiterate the perennial call for crooked bankers to see jail time.
\u201cLooks like another weak settlement by the Department of Justice. Some folks are going to prison, right? Oh wait, that's just in the movies. https://t.co/BIvxcbOH8X\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1482475249
Meanwhile, many have noted that the Deutsche Bank settlement potentially "heads off" a major conflict of interest with President-elect Donald Trump--"whose businesses," the Washington Postwrites, "have borrowed more than $300 million from the troubled German bank."
Still, not everyone's concerns have been assuaged.
"Despite this settlement, the criminal investigation of Deutsche Bank and culpable individuals must continue--and it should be done by independent counsel," Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) toldABC News. "Only an independent counsel can investigate and prosecute vigorously and impartially, in light of conflicts of interest created by the enormous debt owed by Donald Trump to the bank."
Also announced Friday were a settlement with Credit Suisse, also over toxic debt, as well as a DOJ lawsuit against British banking giant Barclays over similar misconduct. "Barclays jeopardized billions of dollars of wealth through practices that were plainly irresponsible and dishonest," U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch said in a statement. "With this filing, we are sending a clear message that the Department of Justice will not tolerate the defrauding of investors and the American people."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.