

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Hundreds of people gathered inside and outside a hearing in Vancouver, Washington on Monday, voicing their opposition to a proposal to build the nation's largest oil-by-rail marine terminal along the Columbia River--just 70 miles downstream from where a so-called bomb train derailed and exploded less than one month ago.
Monday marks the start of five weeks of hearings on the Tesoro Savage Vancouver Energy terminal, which would handle about 360,000 barrels of crude oil and receive an average of four 1 1/2-mile long crude oil trains per day. After hearing expert testimony and public comment, the state's Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) will make a recommendation to Gov. Jay Inslee, who has the final say.
Both Inslee and Oregon Gov. Kate Brown have called for a temporary moratorium on oil-by-rail through their states in the wake of the June 3 derailment in Mosier, Oregon.
The activists who showed up en masse on Monday, wearing red and carrying signs, want that ban to become permanent.
"There's no place for transporting such a dangerous fuel through the Columbia Gorge," Friends of the Columbia Gorge executive director Kevin Gorman told local station KOIN.
According to The Columbian, "[o]nly two groups, Vancouver Energy and the Port of Vancouver, will argue in support of the project during the five weeks of hearings."
Meanwhile, more than a dozen entities--including environmental organizations, native tribes, the state Department of Natural Resources, and the cities of Vancouver and nearby Spokane--are opposed. Furthermore, in January, the Stand Up To Oil campaign delivered a record-breaking 276,296 public comments against the proposal to the EFSEC.
The Columbian reports:
In its opening brief, the city of Vancouver says it is "staunchly opposed to approval of the application" and even includes an aerial photo of the fiery and deadly oil train derailment in Lac-Megantic, Quebec.
"This proposal is directly counter to Vancouver's vision for itself as a vibrant urban community and threatens the safety of its approximately 165,000 citizens," according to the brief.
Indeed, against the backdrop of the Mosier incident--which Fire Chief Jim Appleton described as a "a horrible, horrible event that almost destroyed our community"--the stakes are high in Vancouver.
An analysis by Stand (formerly ForestEthics) published after the derailment showed that 259,698 students in Oregon and Washington state are enrolled in 748 schools within the "blast zone"--the one-mile evacuation area in the event of an oil train derailment and fire.
Last weekend, 21 activists were arrested in Vancouver after forming a human blockade along the tracks.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Hundreds of people gathered inside and outside a hearing in Vancouver, Washington on Monday, voicing their opposition to a proposal to build the nation's largest oil-by-rail marine terminal along the Columbia River--just 70 miles downstream from where a so-called bomb train derailed and exploded less than one month ago.
Monday marks the start of five weeks of hearings on the Tesoro Savage Vancouver Energy terminal, which would handle about 360,000 barrels of crude oil and receive an average of four 1 1/2-mile long crude oil trains per day. After hearing expert testimony and public comment, the state's Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) will make a recommendation to Gov. Jay Inslee, who has the final say.
Both Inslee and Oregon Gov. Kate Brown have called for a temporary moratorium on oil-by-rail through their states in the wake of the June 3 derailment in Mosier, Oregon.
The activists who showed up en masse on Monday, wearing red and carrying signs, want that ban to become permanent.
"There's no place for transporting such a dangerous fuel through the Columbia Gorge," Friends of the Columbia Gorge executive director Kevin Gorman told local station KOIN.
According to The Columbian, "[o]nly two groups, Vancouver Energy and the Port of Vancouver, will argue in support of the project during the five weeks of hearings."
Meanwhile, more than a dozen entities--including environmental organizations, native tribes, the state Department of Natural Resources, and the cities of Vancouver and nearby Spokane--are opposed. Furthermore, in January, the Stand Up To Oil campaign delivered a record-breaking 276,296 public comments against the proposal to the EFSEC.
The Columbian reports:
In its opening brief, the city of Vancouver says it is "staunchly opposed to approval of the application" and even includes an aerial photo of the fiery and deadly oil train derailment in Lac-Megantic, Quebec.
"This proposal is directly counter to Vancouver's vision for itself as a vibrant urban community and threatens the safety of its approximately 165,000 citizens," according to the brief.
Indeed, against the backdrop of the Mosier incident--which Fire Chief Jim Appleton described as a "a horrible, horrible event that almost destroyed our community"--the stakes are high in Vancouver.
An analysis by Stand (formerly ForestEthics) published after the derailment showed that 259,698 students in Oregon and Washington state are enrolled in 748 schools within the "blast zone"--the one-mile evacuation area in the event of an oil train derailment and fire.
Last weekend, 21 activists were arrested in Vancouver after forming a human blockade along the tracks.
Hundreds of people gathered inside and outside a hearing in Vancouver, Washington on Monday, voicing their opposition to a proposal to build the nation's largest oil-by-rail marine terminal along the Columbia River--just 70 miles downstream from where a so-called bomb train derailed and exploded less than one month ago.
Monday marks the start of five weeks of hearings on the Tesoro Savage Vancouver Energy terminal, which would handle about 360,000 barrels of crude oil and receive an average of four 1 1/2-mile long crude oil trains per day. After hearing expert testimony and public comment, the state's Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) will make a recommendation to Gov. Jay Inslee, who has the final say.
Both Inslee and Oregon Gov. Kate Brown have called for a temporary moratorium on oil-by-rail through their states in the wake of the June 3 derailment in Mosier, Oregon.
The activists who showed up en masse on Monday, wearing red and carrying signs, want that ban to become permanent.
"There's no place for transporting such a dangerous fuel through the Columbia Gorge," Friends of the Columbia Gorge executive director Kevin Gorman told local station KOIN.
According to The Columbian, "[o]nly two groups, Vancouver Energy and the Port of Vancouver, will argue in support of the project during the five weeks of hearings."
Meanwhile, more than a dozen entities--including environmental organizations, native tribes, the state Department of Natural Resources, and the cities of Vancouver and nearby Spokane--are opposed. Furthermore, in January, the Stand Up To Oil campaign delivered a record-breaking 276,296 public comments against the proposal to the EFSEC.
The Columbian reports:
In its opening brief, the city of Vancouver says it is "staunchly opposed to approval of the application" and even includes an aerial photo of the fiery and deadly oil train derailment in Lac-Megantic, Quebec.
"This proposal is directly counter to Vancouver's vision for itself as a vibrant urban community and threatens the safety of its approximately 165,000 citizens," according to the brief.
Indeed, against the backdrop of the Mosier incident--which Fire Chief Jim Appleton described as a "a horrible, horrible event that almost destroyed our community"--the stakes are high in Vancouver.
An analysis by Stand (formerly ForestEthics) published after the derailment showed that 259,698 students in Oregon and Washington state are enrolled in 748 schools within the "blast zone"--the one-mile evacuation area in the event of an oil train derailment and fire.
Last weekend, 21 activists were arrested in Vancouver after forming a human blockade along the tracks.