SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Decisive and Tremendous Win' for Net Neutrality as DC Court Upholds Rules
D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the FCC was within its jurisdiction to enact sweeping net neutrality regulations
Jun 14, 2016
In a huge win for internet freedom, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday ruled that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was within its jurisdiction to enact sweeping net neutrality regulations last year.
That means the internet will remain a public service classified under Title II of the Communications Act--upholding the FCC's power to ensure that all carriers, including mobile and broadband, treat all internet traffic equally.
"Today's decision is a victory for consumers, free expression, and the core principles on which the internet was created," Lisa Hayes, vice president for programs and strategy at the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), said in a statement on Tuesday. "The Court made the right decision in affirming the FCC's decision on reclassification of internet broadband services, providing the best path forward for advancement of consumer choice, access, and privacy rights."
The case, U.S. Telecom v FCC (pdf), arose when a coalition of telecommunications companies and other trade groups representing Internet Service Providers (ISPs) challenged the FCC's reclassification on the grounds that the commission did not have the authority to enforce net neutrality protections.
The three-judge panel ruled 2-1 in favor of the FCC. Judges Sri Srinivasan and David Tatel further found that not only did the FCC have authority to reclassify the internet in February 2015, it was also a "reasonable" decision, particularly in light of the "rapidly growing and virtually universal use of mobile broadband service today."
"Today's ruling is a victory for consumers and innovators who deserve unfettered access to the entire web," FCC chairman Tom Wheeler said in a statement on Tuesday. "It ensures the internet remains a platform for unparalleled innovation, free expression and economic growth."
The panel "resoundingly rejected all the challenges...made against the FCC's net neutrality rules," Kevin Russell, one of the attorneys representing the commission, said Tuesday on a press call. He called the decision an "across-the-board win."
Michael Scurato, vice president of policy at the National Hispanic Media Coalition, said, "The internet is a place where people of color can tell their own stories without a gatekeeper standing in the way. This court decision is a great victory for communities of color, who are consistently underrepresented and misrepresented in traditional media outlets."
"We cannot achieve equality in the 21st century without universal, affordable and open internet access," Scurato said. "Today's decision brings us another step closer in that struggle."
Malkia Cyril, executive director of the Center for Media Justice, added that the ruling was particularly important in light of the mass shooting at an LGBTQ club in Orlando on Sunday that killed 49 people and wounded 53.
"In moments like these, the dead need the living to speak for them, and the living need a platform without gatekeepers," Cyril said.
As CDT pointed out, the order is also good news for privacy protections, as the FCC's rules require that internet users have a clear understanding and choice in how providers use their information about their online activities.
"As the Circuit Court found, the FCC carefully reviewed a complete record in the Open Internet proceeding and clearly explained its approach for putting in place meaningful open internet protections," Hayes concluded.
Sarah Morris, senior policy counsel at the Open Technology Institute at New America, said the decision was a "decisive and tremendous win for all Americans."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
In a huge win for internet freedom, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday ruled that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was within its jurisdiction to enact sweeping net neutrality regulations last year.
That means the internet will remain a public service classified under Title II of the Communications Act--upholding the FCC's power to ensure that all carriers, including mobile and broadband, treat all internet traffic equally.
"Today's decision is a victory for consumers, free expression, and the core principles on which the internet was created," Lisa Hayes, vice president for programs and strategy at the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), said in a statement on Tuesday. "The Court made the right decision in affirming the FCC's decision on reclassification of internet broadband services, providing the best path forward for advancement of consumer choice, access, and privacy rights."
The case, U.S. Telecom v FCC (pdf), arose when a coalition of telecommunications companies and other trade groups representing Internet Service Providers (ISPs) challenged the FCC's reclassification on the grounds that the commission did not have the authority to enforce net neutrality protections.
The three-judge panel ruled 2-1 in favor of the FCC. Judges Sri Srinivasan and David Tatel further found that not only did the FCC have authority to reclassify the internet in February 2015, it was also a "reasonable" decision, particularly in light of the "rapidly growing and virtually universal use of mobile broadband service today."
"Today's ruling is a victory for consumers and innovators who deserve unfettered access to the entire web," FCC chairman Tom Wheeler said in a statement on Tuesday. "It ensures the internet remains a platform for unparalleled innovation, free expression and economic growth."
The panel "resoundingly rejected all the challenges...made against the FCC's net neutrality rules," Kevin Russell, one of the attorneys representing the commission, said Tuesday on a press call. He called the decision an "across-the-board win."
Michael Scurato, vice president of policy at the National Hispanic Media Coalition, said, "The internet is a place where people of color can tell their own stories without a gatekeeper standing in the way. This court decision is a great victory for communities of color, who are consistently underrepresented and misrepresented in traditional media outlets."
"We cannot achieve equality in the 21st century without universal, affordable and open internet access," Scurato said. "Today's decision brings us another step closer in that struggle."
Malkia Cyril, executive director of the Center for Media Justice, added that the ruling was particularly important in light of the mass shooting at an LGBTQ club in Orlando on Sunday that killed 49 people and wounded 53.
"In moments like these, the dead need the living to speak for them, and the living need a platform without gatekeepers," Cyril said.
As CDT pointed out, the order is also good news for privacy protections, as the FCC's rules require that internet users have a clear understanding and choice in how providers use their information about their online activities.
"As the Circuit Court found, the FCC carefully reviewed a complete record in the Open Internet proceeding and clearly explained its approach for putting in place meaningful open internet protections," Hayes concluded.
Sarah Morris, senior policy counsel at the Open Technology Institute at New America, said the decision was a "decisive and tremendous win for all Americans."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
In a huge win for internet freedom, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday ruled that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was within its jurisdiction to enact sweeping net neutrality regulations last year.
That means the internet will remain a public service classified under Title II of the Communications Act--upholding the FCC's power to ensure that all carriers, including mobile and broadband, treat all internet traffic equally.
"Today's decision is a victory for consumers, free expression, and the core principles on which the internet was created," Lisa Hayes, vice president for programs and strategy at the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), said in a statement on Tuesday. "The Court made the right decision in affirming the FCC's decision on reclassification of internet broadband services, providing the best path forward for advancement of consumer choice, access, and privacy rights."
The case, U.S. Telecom v FCC (pdf), arose when a coalition of telecommunications companies and other trade groups representing Internet Service Providers (ISPs) challenged the FCC's reclassification on the grounds that the commission did not have the authority to enforce net neutrality protections.
The three-judge panel ruled 2-1 in favor of the FCC. Judges Sri Srinivasan and David Tatel further found that not only did the FCC have authority to reclassify the internet in February 2015, it was also a "reasonable" decision, particularly in light of the "rapidly growing and virtually universal use of mobile broadband service today."
"Today's ruling is a victory for consumers and innovators who deserve unfettered access to the entire web," FCC chairman Tom Wheeler said in a statement on Tuesday. "It ensures the internet remains a platform for unparalleled innovation, free expression and economic growth."
The panel "resoundingly rejected all the challenges...made against the FCC's net neutrality rules," Kevin Russell, one of the attorneys representing the commission, said Tuesday on a press call. He called the decision an "across-the-board win."
Michael Scurato, vice president of policy at the National Hispanic Media Coalition, said, "The internet is a place where people of color can tell their own stories without a gatekeeper standing in the way. This court decision is a great victory for communities of color, who are consistently underrepresented and misrepresented in traditional media outlets."
"We cannot achieve equality in the 21st century without universal, affordable and open internet access," Scurato said. "Today's decision brings us another step closer in that struggle."
Malkia Cyril, executive director of the Center for Media Justice, added that the ruling was particularly important in light of the mass shooting at an LGBTQ club in Orlando on Sunday that killed 49 people and wounded 53.
"In moments like these, the dead need the living to speak for them, and the living need a platform without gatekeepers," Cyril said.
As CDT pointed out, the order is also good news for privacy protections, as the FCC's rules require that internet users have a clear understanding and choice in how providers use their information about their online activities.
"As the Circuit Court found, the FCC carefully reviewed a complete record in the Open Internet proceeding and clearly explained its approach for putting in place meaningful open internet protections," Hayes concluded.
Sarah Morris, senior policy counsel at the Open Technology Institute at New America, said the decision was a "decisive and tremendous win for all Americans."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.