Reproductive health advocates previously called the legislation "one of the worst anti-abortion bills in the country." (Photo: David/flickr/cc)
Apr 07, 2016
The ACLU and Planned Parenthood have filed a lawsuit against Indiana over its restrictive new abortion law, signed in March by Governor Mike Pence, which bans abortions in cases of fetal abnormalities and imposes a litany of other restrictions and requirements.
The lawsuit (pdf), filed Thursday in U.S. district court by ACLU Indiana and the Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK), states that the legislation is unconstitutional and seeks an injunction to block its enforcement. The law is set to go into effect on July 1.
"The United States has repeatedly stressed that a woman, not the state, is to determine whether or not to obtain an abortion," ACLU-IN legal director Ken Falk said. "The state of Indiana's attempt to invade a woman's privacy and to control her decision in this regard is unprecedented and unconstitutional."
Indiana House Enrolled Act 1337 prohibits abortions in the early stages of pregnancy based on fetal abnormalities and also mandates the burial or cremation of aborted or miscarried remains; restricts fetal tissue donation; and requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at hospitals.
It also requires doctors to report if a fetal abnormality was present before an abortion--which would undermine a Planned Parenthood principle not to ask patients why they are seeking the procedure--and to inform patients of the ban as part of Indiana's state-mandated "informed consent" process, which the ACLU said violates the First Amendment.
Reproductive health advocates previously called the legislation "one of the worst anti-abortion bills in the country."
Jane Henegar, ACLU-IN executive director, said Thursday that the new restrictions "demean women and threaten the quality of their health care."
Betty Cockrum, CEO and president of PPINK, added, "This law is clearly another attempt by the governor to end access to safe, legal abortions by imposing more unnecessary and unconstitutional restrictions on women, our health care centers, and our staff."
The National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum also released a statement in support of the lawsuit that read, "This law is cloaked in the language of civil rights and equality for women, but it is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Rather than lifting the status of women, this law is nothing more than a cynical, deceptive attempt to ban abortions."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The ACLU and Planned Parenthood have filed a lawsuit against Indiana over its restrictive new abortion law, signed in March by Governor Mike Pence, which bans abortions in cases of fetal abnormalities and imposes a litany of other restrictions and requirements.
The lawsuit (pdf), filed Thursday in U.S. district court by ACLU Indiana and the Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK), states that the legislation is unconstitutional and seeks an injunction to block its enforcement. The law is set to go into effect on July 1.
"The United States has repeatedly stressed that a woman, not the state, is to determine whether or not to obtain an abortion," ACLU-IN legal director Ken Falk said. "The state of Indiana's attempt to invade a woman's privacy and to control her decision in this regard is unprecedented and unconstitutional."
Indiana House Enrolled Act 1337 prohibits abortions in the early stages of pregnancy based on fetal abnormalities and also mandates the burial or cremation of aborted or miscarried remains; restricts fetal tissue donation; and requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at hospitals.
It also requires doctors to report if a fetal abnormality was present before an abortion--which would undermine a Planned Parenthood principle not to ask patients why they are seeking the procedure--and to inform patients of the ban as part of Indiana's state-mandated "informed consent" process, which the ACLU said violates the First Amendment.
Reproductive health advocates previously called the legislation "one of the worst anti-abortion bills in the country."
Jane Henegar, ACLU-IN executive director, said Thursday that the new restrictions "demean women and threaten the quality of their health care."
Betty Cockrum, CEO and president of PPINK, added, "This law is clearly another attempt by the governor to end access to safe, legal abortions by imposing more unnecessary and unconstitutional restrictions on women, our health care centers, and our staff."
The National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum also released a statement in support of the lawsuit that read, "This law is cloaked in the language of civil rights and equality for women, but it is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Rather than lifting the status of women, this law is nothing more than a cynical, deceptive attempt to ban abortions."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The ACLU and Planned Parenthood have filed a lawsuit against Indiana over its restrictive new abortion law, signed in March by Governor Mike Pence, which bans abortions in cases of fetal abnormalities and imposes a litany of other restrictions and requirements.
The lawsuit (pdf), filed Thursday in U.S. district court by ACLU Indiana and the Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK), states that the legislation is unconstitutional and seeks an injunction to block its enforcement. The law is set to go into effect on July 1.
"The United States has repeatedly stressed that a woman, not the state, is to determine whether or not to obtain an abortion," ACLU-IN legal director Ken Falk said. "The state of Indiana's attempt to invade a woman's privacy and to control her decision in this regard is unprecedented and unconstitutional."
Indiana House Enrolled Act 1337 prohibits abortions in the early stages of pregnancy based on fetal abnormalities and also mandates the burial or cremation of aborted or miscarried remains; restricts fetal tissue donation; and requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at hospitals.
It also requires doctors to report if a fetal abnormality was present before an abortion--which would undermine a Planned Parenthood principle not to ask patients why they are seeking the procedure--and to inform patients of the ban as part of Indiana's state-mandated "informed consent" process, which the ACLU said violates the First Amendment.
Reproductive health advocates previously called the legislation "one of the worst anti-abortion bills in the country."
Jane Henegar, ACLU-IN executive director, said Thursday that the new restrictions "demean women and threaten the quality of their health care."
Betty Cockrum, CEO and president of PPINK, added, "This law is clearly another attempt by the governor to end access to safe, legal abortions by imposing more unnecessary and unconstitutional restrictions on women, our health care centers, and our staff."
The National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum also released a statement in support of the lawsuit that read, "This law is cloaked in the language of civil rights and equality for women, but it is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Rather than lifting the status of women, this law is nothing more than a cynical, deceptive attempt to ban abortions."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.