

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
At a Senate Banking Committee hearing on Tuesday--which was described as "little more than another attempt to rail against Wall Street regulation"--U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren spent seven minutes tearing into former Federal Reserve deputy director Leonard Chanin, a man she said "might have one of the worst track records in history on this issue."
The hearing, Warren said on her Facebook page, was called by Republicans "to talk about why we should roll back the rules on mortgages and credit cards because they're just too costly for the banks."
Chanin, who now works for a private law firm advising big banks, was summoned as a key witness by the GOP. But Warren called into question his credentials on the matter.
Citing the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, a bipartisan group charged with determining what caused the 2008 economic meltdown, the Democrat from Massachusetts lambasted the Federal Reserve's "pivotal failure to stem the flow of toxic mortgages" as the "prime example" of "the kind of hands-off regulatory approach" that allowed the crisis to occur.
"So when you talk now about how certain regulations are too costly or too difficult to comply with," Warren said, "you sound a lot like you did before the 2008 crisis when you failed to act. So my question is, given your track record at the Fed, why should anyone take you seriously now?"
Chanin, in turn, said: "There was simply no data presented to the Fed on a statistical basis that suggested that there was a meltdown in the mortgage market in 2005 or 2006."
A clearly exasperated Warren interrupted him.
"I'm sorry, are you saying there were no data in the lead up the financial crash that showed the increasing default rates on subprime mortgages and what they were doing to communities across America?" she said. "Did you have your eyes stitched closed?"
"No hard data..." Chanin started to respond.
"Oh my god," Warren sighed.
Watch the full, heated exchange below:
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
At a Senate Banking Committee hearing on Tuesday--which was described as "little more than another attempt to rail against Wall Street regulation"--U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren spent seven minutes tearing into former Federal Reserve deputy director Leonard Chanin, a man she said "might have one of the worst track records in history on this issue."
The hearing, Warren said on her Facebook page, was called by Republicans "to talk about why we should roll back the rules on mortgages and credit cards because they're just too costly for the banks."
Chanin, who now works for a private law firm advising big banks, was summoned as a key witness by the GOP. But Warren called into question his credentials on the matter.
Citing the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, a bipartisan group charged with determining what caused the 2008 economic meltdown, the Democrat from Massachusetts lambasted the Federal Reserve's "pivotal failure to stem the flow of toxic mortgages" as the "prime example" of "the kind of hands-off regulatory approach" that allowed the crisis to occur.
"So when you talk now about how certain regulations are too costly or too difficult to comply with," Warren said, "you sound a lot like you did before the 2008 crisis when you failed to act. So my question is, given your track record at the Fed, why should anyone take you seriously now?"
Chanin, in turn, said: "There was simply no data presented to the Fed on a statistical basis that suggested that there was a meltdown in the mortgage market in 2005 or 2006."
A clearly exasperated Warren interrupted him.
"I'm sorry, are you saying there were no data in the lead up the financial crash that showed the increasing default rates on subprime mortgages and what they were doing to communities across America?" she said. "Did you have your eyes stitched closed?"
"No hard data..." Chanin started to respond.
"Oh my god," Warren sighed.
Watch the full, heated exchange below:
At a Senate Banking Committee hearing on Tuesday--which was described as "little more than another attempt to rail against Wall Street regulation"--U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren spent seven minutes tearing into former Federal Reserve deputy director Leonard Chanin, a man she said "might have one of the worst track records in history on this issue."
The hearing, Warren said on her Facebook page, was called by Republicans "to talk about why we should roll back the rules on mortgages and credit cards because they're just too costly for the banks."
Chanin, who now works for a private law firm advising big banks, was summoned as a key witness by the GOP. But Warren called into question his credentials on the matter.
Citing the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, a bipartisan group charged with determining what caused the 2008 economic meltdown, the Democrat from Massachusetts lambasted the Federal Reserve's "pivotal failure to stem the flow of toxic mortgages" as the "prime example" of "the kind of hands-off regulatory approach" that allowed the crisis to occur.
"So when you talk now about how certain regulations are too costly or too difficult to comply with," Warren said, "you sound a lot like you did before the 2008 crisis when you failed to act. So my question is, given your track record at the Fed, why should anyone take you seriously now?"
Chanin, in turn, said: "There was simply no data presented to the Fed on a statistical basis that suggested that there was a meltdown in the mortgage market in 2005 or 2006."
A clearly exasperated Warren interrupted him.
"I'm sorry, are you saying there were no data in the lead up the financial crash that showed the increasing default rates on subprime mortgages and what they were doing to communities across America?" she said. "Did you have your eyes stitched closed?"
"No hard data..." Chanin started to respond.
"Oh my god," Warren sighed.
Watch the full, heated exchange below: