SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
With Faith in Regulators at 'All Time Low,' Canadians Ask Trudeau: 'Where Are You?'
Groups charge that the NEB—packed with fossil fuels executives appointed by Stephen Harper—makes no effort to meaningfully involve members of the public.
Jan 20, 2016
As Canada's National Energy Board (NEB) begins hearing testimony on the controversial Kinder Morgan tar sands pipeline expansion project in British Columbia, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is under fire from environmentalists and First Nations activists who say he's breaking an election promise to fix what they call a broken pipeline approval process.
"We're here to change the fundamentally flawed NEB process," said Grand Chief Stewart Phillip of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs at a protest--one of several taking place around the country this week--on Tuesday. "The outstanding question of today is, Prime Minister Trudeau, where are you?"
"Every day these hearings proceed, more damage is done."
--Kai Nagata, Dogwood Initiative
Kinder Morgan Canada is seeking NEB approval to increase the capacity of its Trans Mountain Pipeline to 890,000 barrels a day from 300,000. According to the Vancouver Sun on Wednesday, the expansion could increase the number of tanker trips through the region from about 70 per year to more than 400, raising the prospect of major spills, as well as other social, economic, and environmental impacts.
Campaigners say the NEB approval process doesn't sufficiently take into account any such individual and cumulative impacts, resultant greenhouse gas emissions, or First Nations rights and traditions. What's more, they charge that the NEB--packed with fossil fuels executives appointed by former Prime Minister Stephen Harper--makes no effort to meaningfully involve members of the public.
"Public faith in the NEB is at an all time low," said Karen Campbell, a lawyer at the Canadian legal charity Ecojustice, on Wednesday.
Explaining why he would not give his scheduled testimony, Lower Nicola Indian Band Chief Aaron Sam told Indian Country Today Media Network: "The National Energy Board process does not take our considerations seriously. It does not take into consideration the rights of Indigenous people. It doesn't take into serious consideration taking care of the environment, our salmon, our animals, our water, and we're not going to take part in a process that has a predetermined outcome."
As the National Observer reports, "Under its 'real change' election campaign in 2015, the Liberal Party promised to 'make environmental assessments credible again' with an overhaul of the NEB. The government has yet to make an announcement however, on how the process will change, despite large pipeline projects like the Trans Mountain expansion currently under review."
"The Prime Minister said repeatedly during the election that the process is flawed and must be fixed, but so far we've seen nothing. The clock is ticking for Ottawa to fulfill this key election promise," Kai Nagata of the Dogwood Initiative said. "Every day these hearings proceed, more damage is done."
But in fact, DeSmog Canada noted on Tuesday, "Trudeau's government has been clear on several occasions pipeline projects currently under National Energy Board review will not be forced to go back to 'square one,' that is, begin their application process completely from scratch."
Speaking to DeSmog, Council of Canadians energy and climate justice campaigner Andrea Harden-Donahue conceded: "We shouldn't rush the creation of a new process."
However, she added, "continuing with the flawed Kinder Morgan and Energy East reviews is entirely inconsistent with Liberal promises. How can a 'transition strategy' rectify the failings around public participation and Indigenous consultation for these projects. I don't see how this can happen. We are not saying pipeline companies have to go back to square one. All evidence submitted goes on hold and this can be supplemented with additional evidence after the changes are made."
Still, Derek Leahy wrote for DeSmog:
By allowing pipeline reviews to proceed under the previous federal government's rules, the Liberal government may be condemning projects to go back to 'square one' regardless. First Nations, and environmental organizations over the last four years have not been hesitant to take pipeline reviews to court over violations of 'aboriginal' rights or the freedom of expression.
The NEB hearings, scheduled to take place in Burnaby between January 19-29, are being live-streamed here.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
350.orgcouncil of canadiansfirst nationsfossil fuelsgreenpeaceindigenoustar sandstrans mountain pipeline
As Canada's National Energy Board (NEB) begins hearing testimony on the controversial Kinder Morgan tar sands pipeline expansion project in British Columbia, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is under fire from environmentalists and First Nations activists who say he's breaking an election promise to fix what they call a broken pipeline approval process.
"We're here to change the fundamentally flawed NEB process," said Grand Chief Stewart Phillip of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs at a protest--one of several taking place around the country this week--on Tuesday. "The outstanding question of today is, Prime Minister Trudeau, where are you?"
"Every day these hearings proceed, more damage is done."
--Kai Nagata, Dogwood Initiative
Kinder Morgan Canada is seeking NEB approval to increase the capacity of its Trans Mountain Pipeline to 890,000 barrels a day from 300,000. According to the Vancouver Sun on Wednesday, the expansion could increase the number of tanker trips through the region from about 70 per year to more than 400, raising the prospect of major spills, as well as other social, economic, and environmental impacts.
Campaigners say the NEB approval process doesn't sufficiently take into account any such individual and cumulative impacts, resultant greenhouse gas emissions, or First Nations rights and traditions. What's more, they charge that the NEB--packed with fossil fuels executives appointed by former Prime Minister Stephen Harper--makes no effort to meaningfully involve members of the public.
"Public faith in the NEB is at an all time low," said Karen Campbell, a lawyer at the Canadian legal charity Ecojustice, on Wednesday.
Explaining why he would not give his scheduled testimony, Lower Nicola Indian Band Chief Aaron Sam told Indian Country Today Media Network: "The National Energy Board process does not take our considerations seriously. It does not take into consideration the rights of Indigenous people. It doesn't take into serious consideration taking care of the environment, our salmon, our animals, our water, and we're not going to take part in a process that has a predetermined outcome."
As the National Observer reports, "Under its 'real change' election campaign in 2015, the Liberal Party promised to 'make environmental assessments credible again' with an overhaul of the NEB. The government has yet to make an announcement however, on how the process will change, despite large pipeline projects like the Trans Mountain expansion currently under review."
"The Prime Minister said repeatedly during the election that the process is flawed and must be fixed, but so far we've seen nothing. The clock is ticking for Ottawa to fulfill this key election promise," Kai Nagata of the Dogwood Initiative said. "Every day these hearings proceed, more damage is done."
But in fact, DeSmog Canada noted on Tuesday, "Trudeau's government has been clear on several occasions pipeline projects currently under National Energy Board review will not be forced to go back to 'square one,' that is, begin their application process completely from scratch."
Speaking to DeSmog, Council of Canadians energy and climate justice campaigner Andrea Harden-Donahue conceded: "We shouldn't rush the creation of a new process."
However, she added, "continuing with the flawed Kinder Morgan and Energy East reviews is entirely inconsistent with Liberal promises. How can a 'transition strategy' rectify the failings around public participation and Indigenous consultation for these projects. I don't see how this can happen. We are not saying pipeline companies have to go back to square one. All evidence submitted goes on hold and this can be supplemented with additional evidence after the changes are made."
Still, Derek Leahy wrote for DeSmog:
By allowing pipeline reviews to proceed under the previous federal government's rules, the Liberal government may be condemning projects to go back to 'square one' regardless. First Nations, and environmental organizations over the last four years have not been hesitant to take pipeline reviews to court over violations of 'aboriginal' rights or the freedom of expression.
The NEB hearings, scheduled to take place in Burnaby between January 19-29, are being live-streamed here.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
As Canada's National Energy Board (NEB) begins hearing testimony on the controversial Kinder Morgan tar sands pipeline expansion project in British Columbia, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is under fire from environmentalists and First Nations activists who say he's breaking an election promise to fix what they call a broken pipeline approval process.
"We're here to change the fundamentally flawed NEB process," said Grand Chief Stewart Phillip of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs at a protest--one of several taking place around the country this week--on Tuesday. "The outstanding question of today is, Prime Minister Trudeau, where are you?"
"Every day these hearings proceed, more damage is done."
--Kai Nagata, Dogwood Initiative
Kinder Morgan Canada is seeking NEB approval to increase the capacity of its Trans Mountain Pipeline to 890,000 barrels a day from 300,000. According to the Vancouver Sun on Wednesday, the expansion could increase the number of tanker trips through the region from about 70 per year to more than 400, raising the prospect of major spills, as well as other social, economic, and environmental impacts.
Campaigners say the NEB approval process doesn't sufficiently take into account any such individual and cumulative impacts, resultant greenhouse gas emissions, or First Nations rights and traditions. What's more, they charge that the NEB--packed with fossil fuels executives appointed by former Prime Minister Stephen Harper--makes no effort to meaningfully involve members of the public.
"Public faith in the NEB is at an all time low," said Karen Campbell, a lawyer at the Canadian legal charity Ecojustice, on Wednesday.
Explaining why he would not give his scheduled testimony, Lower Nicola Indian Band Chief Aaron Sam told Indian Country Today Media Network: "The National Energy Board process does not take our considerations seriously. It does not take into consideration the rights of Indigenous people. It doesn't take into serious consideration taking care of the environment, our salmon, our animals, our water, and we're not going to take part in a process that has a predetermined outcome."
As the National Observer reports, "Under its 'real change' election campaign in 2015, the Liberal Party promised to 'make environmental assessments credible again' with an overhaul of the NEB. The government has yet to make an announcement however, on how the process will change, despite large pipeline projects like the Trans Mountain expansion currently under review."
"The Prime Minister said repeatedly during the election that the process is flawed and must be fixed, but so far we've seen nothing. The clock is ticking for Ottawa to fulfill this key election promise," Kai Nagata of the Dogwood Initiative said. "Every day these hearings proceed, more damage is done."
But in fact, DeSmog Canada noted on Tuesday, "Trudeau's government has been clear on several occasions pipeline projects currently under National Energy Board review will not be forced to go back to 'square one,' that is, begin their application process completely from scratch."
Speaking to DeSmog, Council of Canadians energy and climate justice campaigner Andrea Harden-Donahue conceded: "We shouldn't rush the creation of a new process."
However, she added, "continuing with the flawed Kinder Morgan and Energy East reviews is entirely inconsistent with Liberal promises. How can a 'transition strategy' rectify the failings around public participation and Indigenous consultation for these projects. I don't see how this can happen. We are not saying pipeline companies have to go back to square one. All evidence submitted goes on hold and this can be supplemented with additional evidence after the changes are made."
Still, Derek Leahy wrote for DeSmog:
By allowing pipeline reviews to proceed under the previous federal government's rules, the Liberal government may be condemning projects to go back to 'square one' regardless. First Nations, and environmental organizations over the last four years have not been hesitant to take pipeline reviews to court over violations of 'aboriginal' rights or the freedom of expression.
The NEB hearings, scheduled to take place in Burnaby between January 19-29, are being live-streamed here.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy