SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Climate activist Abby Brockway sits atop a tripod blocking a BNSF oil train in Everett, Washington in September 2014. (Photo: Delta 5)
Historic Test for Climate Defenders Dealt Legal Blow
Delta 5, who staged blockade of oil train, lost ability to use 'necessity defense'
Jan 14, 2016
A group of climate activists known as the Delta 5 facing trial for blocking an oil train were reportedly dealt a blow on Thursday when the judge "undercut their ability" to defend their act of civil disobedience on the basis of the threat of climate change.
Though last week Snohomish County Judge Anthony Howard took the unprecedented step of allowing the defense to use the "necessity defense"--an argument to justify action taken on behalf of the planet--it now appears the jury will not be able to consider that defense.
Climate activist Tim DeChristopher, who has been tweeting developments from the courtroom, posted the news:
It was also tweeted by the organization Environmental Action:
\u201cJudge rules that necessity defense cannot be instructed to be considered by jury in #Delta5 trial.\u201d— Environmental Action (@Environmental Action) 1452801995
As Common Dreams previously reported, in September 2014, the defendants, Patrick Mazza, Abby Brockway, Mike Lapointe, Jackie Minchew, and Liz Spoerri staged an 8-hour blockade of a BNSF rail line carrying crude oil through the town of Everett, Washington by tying themselves to a 25-foot tripod structure which they had erected over the tracks.
Spoerri said her aim with the action "was to oppose WA state becoming a fan for the fires of climate chaos," and that her hope was for others to "be inspired to block carbon exports and prevent climate chaos in any way they can."
DeChristopher, who spent two years in federal prison for disrupting a federal auction of oil and gas leases, wrote in an op-ed published Wednesday at the Guardian that "the principled position of the activists demonstrates the potential of power rooted in love rather than force. The activists bring a vision of justice that shames the mere legalism of the state."
"Around the globe climate movements are trying to build power. Some of those are trying to build power based on an old model from a dying empire," he continued. "Here, in the trial of the Delta 5, the climate movement is building a new kind of power, grounded in interdependency and wielded through vulnerability. Our rapidly evolving and unstable world demands no less."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A group of climate activists known as the Delta 5 facing trial for blocking an oil train were reportedly dealt a blow on Thursday when the judge "undercut their ability" to defend their act of civil disobedience on the basis of the threat of climate change.
Though last week Snohomish County Judge Anthony Howard took the unprecedented step of allowing the defense to use the "necessity defense"--an argument to justify action taken on behalf of the planet--it now appears the jury will not be able to consider that defense.
Climate activist Tim DeChristopher, who has been tweeting developments from the courtroom, posted the news:
It was also tweeted by the organization Environmental Action:
\u201cJudge rules that necessity defense cannot be instructed to be considered by jury in #Delta5 trial.\u201d— Environmental Action (@Environmental Action) 1452801995
As Common Dreams previously reported, in September 2014, the defendants, Patrick Mazza, Abby Brockway, Mike Lapointe, Jackie Minchew, and Liz Spoerri staged an 8-hour blockade of a BNSF rail line carrying crude oil through the town of Everett, Washington by tying themselves to a 25-foot tripod structure which they had erected over the tracks.
Spoerri said her aim with the action "was to oppose WA state becoming a fan for the fires of climate chaos," and that her hope was for others to "be inspired to block carbon exports and prevent climate chaos in any way they can."
DeChristopher, who spent two years in federal prison for disrupting a federal auction of oil and gas leases, wrote in an op-ed published Wednesday at the Guardian that "the principled position of the activists demonstrates the potential of power rooted in love rather than force. The activists bring a vision of justice that shames the mere legalism of the state."
"Around the globe climate movements are trying to build power. Some of those are trying to build power based on an old model from a dying empire," he continued. "Here, in the trial of the Delta 5, the climate movement is building a new kind of power, grounded in interdependency and wielded through vulnerability. Our rapidly evolving and unstable world demands no less."
A group of climate activists known as the Delta 5 facing trial for blocking an oil train were reportedly dealt a blow on Thursday when the judge "undercut their ability" to defend their act of civil disobedience on the basis of the threat of climate change.
Though last week Snohomish County Judge Anthony Howard took the unprecedented step of allowing the defense to use the "necessity defense"--an argument to justify action taken on behalf of the planet--it now appears the jury will not be able to consider that defense.
Climate activist Tim DeChristopher, who has been tweeting developments from the courtroom, posted the news:
It was also tweeted by the organization Environmental Action:
\u201cJudge rules that necessity defense cannot be instructed to be considered by jury in #Delta5 trial.\u201d— Environmental Action (@Environmental Action) 1452801995
As Common Dreams previously reported, in September 2014, the defendants, Patrick Mazza, Abby Brockway, Mike Lapointe, Jackie Minchew, and Liz Spoerri staged an 8-hour blockade of a BNSF rail line carrying crude oil through the town of Everett, Washington by tying themselves to a 25-foot tripod structure which they had erected over the tracks.
Spoerri said her aim with the action "was to oppose WA state becoming a fan for the fires of climate chaos," and that her hope was for others to "be inspired to block carbon exports and prevent climate chaos in any way they can."
DeChristopher, who spent two years in federal prison for disrupting a federal auction of oil and gas leases, wrote in an op-ed published Wednesday at the Guardian that "the principled position of the activists demonstrates the potential of power rooted in love rather than force. The activists bring a vision of justice that shames the mere legalism of the state."
"Around the globe climate movements are trying to build power. Some of those are trying to build power based on an old model from a dying empire," he continued. "Here, in the trial of the Delta 5, the climate movement is building a new kind of power, grounded in interdependency and wielded through vulnerability. Our rapidly evolving and unstable world demands no less."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.