SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Canadians protest Bill C-51. (Photo: Getty)
Civil liberties activists in Canada are demanding the new administration hold a public debate over a controversial surveillance law set to go into effect later this year.
The legislation, a so-called "anti-terror bill" known as C-51, passed in June 2015 despite widespread outcry from opponents who said it would give police excessive powers and codify racial profiling into law. An alliance of civil society groups, legal scholars, and labor unions are now launching a campaign to demand Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his cabinet hear public voices criticize the law they say threatens privacy, freedom of speech and religion, and other constitutional rights.
"We know very little about the government's plans for C-51, so our hope is they are going to listen to the huge number of Canadians who expressed deep, deep concerns about this bill when it was passed," Josh Paterson, executive director of the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, told the Guardian on Wednesday. "They need to be very clear on what their intentions are before actually doing anything."
In an interview with the Canadian Press last week, Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale said, "The subject matter [of the bill] is large, it's complex, the solutions aren't particularly easy to achieve. But our whole point in having consultations is to listen to what we hear. And if the messages indicate that something more needs to be done, obviously we would try to pursue that."
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has said he would establish an all-party oversight committee on national security, which is expected to happen within six months--but the Liberal administration has remained reticent on the bill itself, despite campaign promises to repeal its "problematic elements."
As Common Dreams has previously reported, C-51 would:
give up to 17 government agencies access to Canadian citizens' private information, including their financial status, medical history, and religious and political beliefs. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service would also be given the power to spy on Canadians and foreign nationals living in the country, while the Royal Canadian Mounted Police would be granted increased powers of preventive arrest.
Under former Prime Minister Stephen Harper's administration, Canada's intelligence agencies operated under the "weakest oversight" in the Western world, as national security whistleblower Edward Snowden warned last March.
As Canadians look to Trudeau's new cabinet to implement a litany of new reforms, the campaigners want to make C-51 a priority.
"At this point there just needs to be some direction from the government about whether there is going to be a consultation and how deeply they are going to reach into bill C-51," said Kent Roach, a University of Toronto professor and outspoken opponent of the law.
Laura Tribe of OpenMedia, a Vancouver-based advocacy group, added, "It was a big issue that got a lot of attention before the election and since the election hasn't seen much action from the government. Canadians are not going to let this one slide."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Civil liberties activists in Canada are demanding the new administration hold a public debate over a controversial surveillance law set to go into effect later this year.
The legislation, a so-called "anti-terror bill" known as C-51, passed in June 2015 despite widespread outcry from opponents who said it would give police excessive powers and codify racial profiling into law. An alliance of civil society groups, legal scholars, and labor unions are now launching a campaign to demand Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his cabinet hear public voices criticize the law they say threatens privacy, freedom of speech and religion, and other constitutional rights.
"We know very little about the government's plans for C-51, so our hope is they are going to listen to the huge number of Canadians who expressed deep, deep concerns about this bill when it was passed," Josh Paterson, executive director of the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, told the Guardian on Wednesday. "They need to be very clear on what their intentions are before actually doing anything."
In an interview with the Canadian Press last week, Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale said, "The subject matter [of the bill] is large, it's complex, the solutions aren't particularly easy to achieve. But our whole point in having consultations is to listen to what we hear. And if the messages indicate that something more needs to be done, obviously we would try to pursue that."
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has said he would establish an all-party oversight committee on national security, which is expected to happen within six months--but the Liberal administration has remained reticent on the bill itself, despite campaign promises to repeal its "problematic elements."
As Common Dreams has previously reported, C-51 would:
give up to 17 government agencies access to Canadian citizens' private information, including their financial status, medical history, and religious and political beliefs. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service would also be given the power to spy on Canadians and foreign nationals living in the country, while the Royal Canadian Mounted Police would be granted increased powers of preventive arrest.
Under former Prime Minister Stephen Harper's administration, Canada's intelligence agencies operated under the "weakest oversight" in the Western world, as national security whistleblower Edward Snowden warned last March.
As Canadians look to Trudeau's new cabinet to implement a litany of new reforms, the campaigners want to make C-51 a priority.
"At this point there just needs to be some direction from the government about whether there is going to be a consultation and how deeply they are going to reach into bill C-51," said Kent Roach, a University of Toronto professor and outspoken opponent of the law.
Laura Tribe of OpenMedia, a Vancouver-based advocacy group, added, "It was a big issue that got a lot of attention before the election and since the election hasn't seen much action from the government. Canadians are not going to let this one slide."
Civil liberties activists in Canada are demanding the new administration hold a public debate over a controversial surveillance law set to go into effect later this year.
The legislation, a so-called "anti-terror bill" known as C-51, passed in June 2015 despite widespread outcry from opponents who said it would give police excessive powers and codify racial profiling into law. An alliance of civil society groups, legal scholars, and labor unions are now launching a campaign to demand Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his cabinet hear public voices criticize the law they say threatens privacy, freedom of speech and religion, and other constitutional rights.
"We know very little about the government's plans for C-51, so our hope is they are going to listen to the huge number of Canadians who expressed deep, deep concerns about this bill when it was passed," Josh Paterson, executive director of the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, told the Guardian on Wednesday. "They need to be very clear on what their intentions are before actually doing anything."
In an interview with the Canadian Press last week, Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale said, "The subject matter [of the bill] is large, it's complex, the solutions aren't particularly easy to achieve. But our whole point in having consultations is to listen to what we hear. And if the messages indicate that something more needs to be done, obviously we would try to pursue that."
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has said he would establish an all-party oversight committee on national security, which is expected to happen within six months--but the Liberal administration has remained reticent on the bill itself, despite campaign promises to repeal its "problematic elements."
As Common Dreams has previously reported, C-51 would:
give up to 17 government agencies access to Canadian citizens' private information, including their financial status, medical history, and religious and political beliefs. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service would also be given the power to spy on Canadians and foreign nationals living in the country, while the Royal Canadian Mounted Police would be granted increased powers of preventive arrest.
Under former Prime Minister Stephen Harper's administration, Canada's intelligence agencies operated under the "weakest oversight" in the Western world, as national security whistleblower Edward Snowden warned last March.
As Canadians look to Trudeau's new cabinet to implement a litany of new reforms, the campaigners want to make C-51 a priority.
"At this point there just needs to be some direction from the government about whether there is going to be a consultation and how deeply they are going to reach into bill C-51," said Kent Roach, a University of Toronto professor and outspoken opponent of the law.
Laura Tribe of OpenMedia, a Vancouver-based advocacy group, added, "It was a big issue that got a lot of attention before the election and since the election hasn't seen much action from the government. Canadians are not going to let this one slide."