Corporate-backed groups "consistently promoted the same contrarian themes--casting doubt, for example, on whether higher levels of man-made carbon-dioxide in the atmosphere were harmful to the planet." (Image: Shutterstock/alphaspirit)
Nov 24, 2015
Corporate dollars intensify ideological polarization while sowing mistrust on the issue of climate change, with ExxonMobil and the Koch family foundations driving the phenomenon through the creation of climate disinformation think tanks and dissemination of coordinated contrarian messaging in mainstream media and public discourse.
So finds a new study, published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science (PNAS) journal and based on an analysis of more than 39 million words of text produced by 164 organizations active in the coordinated campaign to deny the existence of human-caused climate change between 1993 and 2013.
Study author Justin Farrell, a Yale University sociologist, told the Washington Post that this "birds-eye view" revealed an "ecosystem of influence" within the corporate-backed groups.
Within this anti-science echo chamber, the Post reports, "[t]hose that received donations consistently promoted the same contrarian themes--casting doubt, for example, on whether higher levels of man-made carbon-dioxide in the atmosphere were harmful to the planet. There was no evidence of such coordination among the non-funded groups."
Still, as Farrell told the Post: "The contrarian efforts...have made it difficult for ordinary Americans to even know who to trust."
As Brendan DeMelle at the DeSmog Blogpointed out on Tuesday, the research "confirms once again the central thesis of industry-funded attacks on climate science"--a thesis that is at the heart of the escalating #ExxonKnew campaign, aimed at probing the corporation's climate cover-up.
Not only do the study's findings raise questions about how corporate media outlets will cover such misinformation campaigns in the future, wrote DeMelle, but the research also "provides further evidence of the public deception orchestrated by the fossil fuel industry, and should prove valuable to investigators examining ExxonMobil as well as other current and future efforts to hold polluters accountable for their PR pollution."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Corporate dollars intensify ideological polarization while sowing mistrust on the issue of climate change, with ExxonMobil and the Koch family foundations driving the phenomenon through the creation of climate disinformation think tanks and dissemination of coordinated contrarian messaging in mainstream media and public discourse.
So finds a new study, published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science (PNAS) journal and based on an analysis of more than 39 million words of text produced by 164 organizations active in the coordinated campaign to deny the existence of human-caused climate change between 1993 and 2013.
Study author Justin Farrell, a Yale University sociologist, told the Washington Post that this "birds-eye view" revealed an "ecosystem of influence" within the corporate-backed groups.
Within this anti-science echo chamber, the Post reports, "[t]hose that received donations consistently promoted the same contrarian themes--casting doubt, for example, on whether higher levels of man-made carbon-dioxide in the atmosphere were harmful to the planet. There was no evidence of such coordination among the non-funded groups."
Still, as Farrell told the Post: "The contrarian efforts...have made it difficult for ordinary Americans to even know who to trust."
As Brendan DeMelle at the DeSmog Blogpointed out on Tuesday, the research "confirms once again the central thesis of industry-funded attacks on climate science"--a thesis that is at the heart of the escalating #ExxonKnew campaign, aimed at probing the corporation's climate cover-up.
Not only do the study's findings raise questions about how corporate media outlets will cover such misinformation campaigns in the future, wrote DeMelle, but the research also "provides further evidence of the public deception orchestrated by the fossil fuel industry, and should prove valuable to investigators examining ExxonMobil as well as other current and future efforts to hold polluters accountable for their PR pollution."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Corporate dollars intensify ideological polarization while sowing mistrust on the issue of climate change, with ExxonMobil and the Koch family foundations driving the phenomenon through the creation of climate disinformation think tanks and dissemination of coordinated contrarian messaging in mainstream media and public discourse.
So finds a new study, published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science (PNAS) journal and based on an analysis of more than 39 million words of text produced by 164 organizations active in the coordinated campaign to deny the existence of human-caused climate change between 1993 and 2013.
Study author Justin Farrell, a Yale University sociologist, told the Washington Post that this "birds-eye view" revealed an "ecosystem of influence" within the corporate-backed groups.
Within this anti-science echo chamber, the Post reports, "[t]hose that received donations consistently promoted the same contrarian themes--casting doubt, for example, on whether higher levels of man-made carbon-dioxide in the atmosphere were harmful to the planet. There was no evidence of such coordination among the non-funded groups."
Still, as Farrell told the Post: "The contrarian efforts...have made it difficult for ordinary Americans to even know who to trust."
As Brendan DeMelle at the DeSmog Blogpointed out on Tuesday, the research "confirms once again the central thesis of industry-funded attacks on climate science"--a thesis that is at the heart of the escalating #ExxonKnew campaign, aimed at probing the corporation's climate cover-up.
Not only do the study's findings raise questions about how corporate media outlets will cover such misinformation campaigns in the future, wrote DeMelle, but the research also "provides further evidence of the public deception orchestrated by the fossil fuel industry, and should prove valuable to investigators examining ExxonMobil as well as other current and future efforts to hold polluters accountable for their PR pollution."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.