The U.S. has long claimed that the location of the Guantanamo prison allows them to detain "War On Terror" prisoners without granting them due process or legal protections, including those against torture. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Nov 10, 2015
The White House has announced that President Barack Obama will sign the $607 billion "defense" bill overwhelmingly passed by the Senate on Tuesday, even though critics say he is tying his own hands and betraying repeated promises to close the U.S. military's offshore prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba before he leaves office in 2017.
The chamber approved the latest version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which includes a prohibition on relocating those held in the prison to the United States and imposes restrictions on transfers to other countries.
Obama's soon-to-be-released plan to shutter the notorious prison is expected to rely on moving roughly half of the 112 people who remain detained there to U.S. soil.
"By signing the NDAA with new restrictions on transferring detainees out of Guantanamo, President Obama will be making his job of closing the prison and ending indefinite detention harder," Christopher Anders, ACLU senior legislative counsel, told Common Dreams over email.
"The president is tying his own hands by agreeing to the NDAA, and it is now up to him to work harder to achieve this important goal."
--Christopher Anders, ACLU"If he truly wants a chance of closing Guantanamo, he has to order his administration to use all of the power he has now--that means charging in federal court any detainee who the government can prove committed a crime, and transferring abroad the vast majority of detainees who have never been charged with any crime," Anders continued. "The president is tying his own hands by agreeing to the NDAA, and it is now up to him to work harder to achieve this important goal."
Just three senators voted against the NDAA on Tuesday: 2016 presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Jeff Merkeley (D-Ore.). Meanwhile, 91 voted in favor, and six didn't cast their ballots.
Having already passed the House last week 370-58, the NDAA is next headed to Obama's desk. While the president has stated his disagreement with the Guantanamo Bay provisions, he is expected to sign the legislation.
Sanders, meanwhile, referenced the bloated military budget in casting his "no" vote.
"If we are serious about ending waste, fraud, abuse and excessive spending, we have got to focus on all agencies--including the Department of Defense," said Sanders in a statement released Tuesday.
"The Department of Defense is the only federal agency that cannot pass a clean audit," the statement continued. "Many of its major acquisition programs suffer from chronic cost overruns. Virtually every defense contractor has been found guilty or has reached a settlement with the government because of fraudulent and illegal activities. This has got to change."
Jasmine Tucker, senior research analyst for the National Priorities Project, told Common Dreams she also is "not thrilled" with the legislation's inclusion of a massive slush fund to give the Pentagon "money to do whatever they want with, with no accountability."
In addition, the legislation authorizes military aid to Ukrainian forces.
It also green-lights $715 million for Iraqi forces in combat with the Islamic State.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is web editor at In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
The White House has announced that President Barack Obama will sign the $607 billion "defense" bill overwhelmingly passed by the Senate on Tuesday, even though critics say he is tying his own hands and betraying repeated promises to close the U.S. military's offshore prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba before he leaves office in 2017.
The chamber approved the latest version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which includes a prohibition on relocating those held in the prison to the United States and imposes restrictions on transfers to other countries.
Obama's soon-to-be-released plan to shutter the notorious prison is expected to rely on moving roughly half of the 112 people who remain detained there to U.S. soil.
"By signing the NDAA with new restrictions on transferring detainees out of Guantanamo, President Obama will be making his job of closing the prison and ending indefinite detention harder," Christopher Anders, ACLU senior legislative counsel, told Common Dreams over email.
"The president is tying his own hands by agreeing to the NDAA, and it is now up to him to work harder to achieve this important goal."
--Christopher Anders, ACLU"If he truly wants a chance of closing Guantanamo, he has to order his administration to use all of the power he has now--that means charging in federal court any detainee who the government can prove committed a crime, and transferring abroad the vast majority of detainees who have never been charged with any crime," Anders continued. "The president is tying his own hands by agreeing to the NDAA, and it is now up to him to work harder to achieve this important goal."
Just three senators voted against the NDAA on Tuesday: 2016 presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Jeff Merkeley (D-Ore.). Meanwhile, 91 voted in favor, and six didn't cast their ballots.
Having already passed the House last week 370-58, the NDAA is next headed to Obama's desk. While the president has stated his disagreement with the Guantanamo Bay provisions, he is expected to sign the legislation.
Sanders, meanwhile, referenced the bloated military budget in casting his "no" vote.
"If we are serious about ending waste, fraud, abuse and excessive spending, we have got to focus on all agencies--including the Department of Defense," said Sanders in a statement released Tuesday.
"The Department of Defense is the only federal agency that cannot pass a clean audit," the statement continued. "Many of its major acquisition programs suffer from chronic cost overruns. Virtually every defense contractor has been found guilty or has reached a settlement with the government because of fraudulent and illegal activities. This has got to change."
Jasmine Tucker, senior research analyst for the National Priorities Project, told Common Dreams she also is "not thrilled" with the legislation's inclusion of a massive slush fund to give the Pentagon "money to do whatever they want with, with no accountability."
In addition, the legislation authorizes military aid to Ukrainian forces.
It also green-lights $715 million for Iraqi forces in combat with the Islamic State.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is web editor at In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
The White House has announced that President Barack Obama will sign the $607 billion "defense" bill overwhelmingly passed by the Senate on Tuesday, even though critics say he is tying his own hands and betraying repeated promises to close the U.S. military's offshore prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba before he leaves office in 2017.
The chamber approved the latest version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which includes a prohibition on relocating those held in the prison to the United States and imposes restrictions on transfers to other countries.
Obama's soon-to-be-released plan to shutter the notorious prison is expected to rely on moving roughly half of the 112 people who remain detained there to U.S. soil.
"By signing the NDAA with new restrictions on transferring detainees out of Guantanamo, President Obama will be making his job of closing the prison and ending indefinite detention harder," Christopher Anders, ACLU senior legislative counsel, told Common Dreams over email.
"The president is tying his own hands by agreeing to the NDAA, and it is now up to him to work harder to achieve this important goal."
--Christopher Anders, ACLU"If he truly wants a chance of closing Guantanamo, he has to order his administration to use all of the power he has now--that means charging in federal court any detainee who the government can prove committed a crime, and transferring abroad the vast majority of detainees who have never been charged with any crime," Anders continued. "The president is tying his own hands by agreeing to the NDAA, and it is now up to him to work harder to achieve this important goal."
Just three senators voted against the NDAA on Tuesday: 2016 presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Jeff Merkeley (D-Ore.). Meanwhile, 91 voted in favor, and six didn't cast their ballots.
Having already passed the House last week 370-58, the NDAA is next headed to Obama's desk. While the president has stated his disagreement with the Guantanamo Bay provisions, he is expected to sign the legislation.
Sanders, meanwhile, referenced the bloated military budget in casting his "no" vote.
"If we are serious about ending waste, fraud, abuse and excessive spending, we have got to focus on all agencies--including the Department of Defense," said Sanders in a statement released Tuesday.
"The Department of Defense is the only federal agency that cannot pass a clean audit," the statement continued. "Many of its major acquisition programs suffer from chronic cost overruns. Virtually every defense contractor has been found guilty or has reached a settlement with the government because of fraudulent and illegal activities. This has got to change."
Jasmine Tucker, senior research analyst for the National Priorities Project, told Common Dreams she also is "not thrilled" with the legislation's inclusion of a massive slush fund to give the Pentagon "money to do whatever they want with, with no accountability."
In addition, the legislation authorizes military aid to Ukrainian forces.
It also green-lights $715 million for Iraqi forces in combat with the Islamic State.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.