"Agricultural workers are, once again, victims of corporate greed," states lawsuit, filed by former farmhand Enrique Rubio in a Los Angeles District Court on Sept. 22. (Photo: Mike Mozart/cc/flickr)
Sep 30, 2015
Two U.S. workers are suing Monsanto over charges that the company's Roundup herbicide caused their cancers while accusing the agrochemical giant of deliberately misleading the public and regulators about the dangers of being exposed to its product.
The suits, both filed separately last week, come six months after the World Health Organization declared glyphosate, the key weed-killing ingredient in the herbicide, a "probable carcinogen." Earlier this month the California Environmental Protection Agency also announced it would begin labeling the chemical with the same designation.
One suit, filed Sept. 22 in a New York federal court, claims that plaintiff Judi Fitzgerald's exposure to Roundup while working at a horticultural products company in the 1990s was a contributing cause of her 2012 leukemia diagnosis.
Filed on the same day in a Los Angeles District Court, the second suit (pdf) charges that former farm worker Enrique Rubio's weekly exposure to Roundup products--which he sprayed on fruit and vegetable fields in Oregon and California-- was "a substantial and contributing facto[r] in causing [his] grave injuries," referring to his 1995 bone cancer diagnosis.
"For nearly 40 years, farms across the world have used Roundup without knowing of the dangers its use poses," Rubio's suit states. "That is because when Monsanto first introduced Roundup, it touted glyphosate as a tehnological breakthrough: it could kill almost every weed without causing harm either to people or to the environment."
"Of course, history has shown that not to be truth," the statement continues, citing the WHO's recent designation.
"Those most at risk are farm workers and other individuals with workplace exposure to Roundup, such as workers in garden centers, nurseries, and landscapers. Agricultural workers are, once again, victims of corporate greed," the suit states. "Monsanto assured the public that Roundup was harmless," the suit continues, adding that the company "championed falsified data and attacked legitimate studies that revealed its dangers."
"Monsanto led a prolonged campaign of misinformation to convince government agencies, farmers and the general population that roundup was safe," it adds.
The lawsuits further claim that the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) changed an initial classification for glyphosate from "possibly carcinogenic to humans" to "evidence of non-carcinogenicity in humans" after pressure from Monsanto.
In a related development, the EPA announced Monday a series of landmark rules to protect agricultural workers from hazardous chemical exposure.
One of Rubio's attorneys, Robin Greenwald, said she anticipates more suits targeting Monsanto and other biotech companies to follow, as awareness over glyphosate's cancer-causing properties become more widely known. "I believe there will be hundreds of lawsuits brought over time," Greenwald said.
The U.S. lawsuits follows a French court ruling earlier this month that found Monsanto "responsible" for the health problems suffered by a local farmer, who argued that the company's Lasso herbicide did not have proper warning labels. That decision upheld a lower court conviction.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
Two U.S. workers are suing Monsanto over charges that the company's Roundup herbicide caused their cancers while accusing the agrochemical giant of deliberately misleading the public and regulators about the dangers of being exposed to its product.
The suits, both filed separately last week, come six months after the World Health Organization declared glyphosate, the key weed-killing ingredient in the herbicide, a "probable carcinogen." Earlier this month the California Environmental Protection Agency also announced it would begin labeling the chemical with the same designation.
One suit, filed Sept. 22 in a New York federal court, claims that plaintiff Judi Fitzgerald's exposure to Roundup while working at a horticultural products company in the 1990s was a contributing cause of her 2012 leukemia diagnosis.
Filed on the same day in a Los Angeles District Court, the second suit (pdf) charges that former farm worker Enrique Rubio's weekly exposure to Roundup products--which he sprayed on fruit and vegetable fields in Oregon and California-- was "a substantial and contributing facto[r] in causing [his] grave injuries," referring to his 1995 bone cancer diagnosis.
"For nearly 40 years, farms across the world have used Roundup without knowing of the dangers its use poses," Rubio's suit states. "That is because when Monsanto first introduced Roundup, it touted glyphosate as a tehnological breakthrough: it could kill almost every weed without causing harm either to people or to the environment."
"Of course, history has shown that not to be truth," the statement continues, citing the WHO's recent designation.
"Those most at risk are farm workers and other individuals with workplace exposure to Roundup, such as workers in garden centers, nurseries, and landscapers. Agricultural workers are, once again, victims of corporate greed," the suit states. "Monsanto assured the public that Roundup was harmless," the suit continues, adding that the company "championed falsified data and attacked legitimate studies that revealed its dangers."
"Monsanto led a prolonged campaign of misinformation to convince government agencies, farmers and the general population that roundup was safe," it adds.
The lawsuits further claim that the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) changed an initial classification for glyphosate from "possibly carcinogenic to humans" to "evidence of non-carcinogenicity in humans" after pressure from Monsanto.
In a related development, the EPA announced Monday a series of landmark rules to protect agricultural workers from hazardous chemical exposure.
One of Rubio's attorneys, Robin Greenwald, said she anticipates more suits targeting Monsanto and other biotech companies to follow, as awareness over glyphosate's cancer-causing properties become more widely known. "I believe there will be hundreds of lawsuits brought over time," Greenwald said.
The U.S. lawsuits follows a French court ruling earlier this month that found Monsanto "responsible" for the health problems suffered by a local farmer, who argued that the company's Lasso herbicide did not have proper warning labels. That decision upheld a lower court conviction.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
Two U.S. workers are suing Monsanto over charges that the company's Roundup herbicide caused their cancers while accusing the agrochemical giant of deliberately misleading the public and regulators about the dangers of being exposed to its product.
The suits, both filed separately last week, come six months after the World Health Organization declared glyphosate, the key weed-killing ingredient in the herbicide, a "probable carcinogen." Earlier this month the California Environmental Protection Agency also announced it would begin labeling the chemical with the same designation.
One suit, filed Sept. 22 in a New York federal court, claims that plaintiff Judi Fitzgerald's exposure to Roundup while working at a horticultural products company in the 1990s was a contributing cause of her 2012 leukemia diagnosis.
Filed on the same day in a Los Angeles District Court, the second suit (pdf) charges that former farm worker Enrique Rubio's weekly exposure to Roundup products--which he sprayed on fruit and vegetable fields in Oregon and California-- was "a substantial and contributing facto[r] in causing [his] grave injuries," referring to his 1995 bone cancer diagnosis.
"For nearly 40 years, farms across the world have used Roundup without knowing of the dangers its use poses," Rubio's suit states. "That is because when Monsanto first introduced Roundup, it touted glyphosate as a tehnological breakthrough: it could kill almost every weed without causing harm either to people or to the environment."
"Of course, history has shown that not to be truth," the statement continues, citing the WHO's recent designation.
"Those most at risk are farm workers and other individuals with workplace exposure to Roundup, such as workers in garden centers, nurseries, and landscapers. Agricultural workers are, once again, victims of corporate greed," the suit states. "Monsanto assured the public that Roundup was harmless," the suit continues, adding that the company "championed falsified data and attacked legitimate studies that revealed its dangers."
"Monsanto led a prolonged campaign of misinformation to convince government agencies, farmers and the general population that roundup was safe," it adds.
The lawsuits further claim that the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) changed an initial classification for glyphosate from "possibly carcinogenic to humans" to "evidence of non-carcinogenicity in humans" after pressure from Monsanto.
In a related development, the EPA announced Monday a series of landmark rules to protect agricultural workers from hazardous chemical exposure.
One of Rubio's attorneys, Robin Greenwald, said she anticipates more suits targeting Monsanto and other biotech companies to follow, as awareness over glyphosate's cancer-causing properties become more widely known. "I believe there will be hundreds of lawsuits brought over time," Greenwald said.
The U.S. lawsuits follows a French court ruling earlier this month that found Monsanto "responsible" for the health problems suffered by a local farmer, who argued that the company's Lasso herbicide did not have proper warning labels. That decision upheld a lower court conviction.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.