
Jeremy Corbyn at a campaign rally earlier this month.
(Photo: Reuters)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Jeremy Corbyn at a campaign rally earlier this month.
Even as the mainstream media and members of his own party seek to portray Labour leader hopeful Jeremy Corbyn as uncredible on economic policy, a group of more than 40 leading economists wrote a paper this weekend. They seek to counter that narrative by publicly supporting key planks of his anti-austerity platform.
"His opposition to austerity is mainstream economics," the economists wrote in an open letter published Sunday. "Despite the barrage of media coverage to the contrary, the current government's policy and its objectives are extreme."
The letter clarifies that its signatories "are not all supporters of Jeremy Corbyn," who is currently the frontrunner in the leadership contest according to national polls.
"But we hope to clarify just where the 'extremism' lies in the current economic debate," they continued, blasting harsh spending cuts and privatization embraced by current Labour leaders.
Meanwhile, on Sunday, Corbyn detailed his economic strategy in the Observer, criticizing "an absentee government" that has produced "yawning inequality" in the UK.
"Parliament can feel like living in a time warp at the best of times," he wrote, "but this government is not just replaying 2010, but taking us back to 1979: ideologically committed to rolling back the state, attacking workers' rights and trade union protection, selling off public assets and extending the sell-off to social housing."
Corbyn highlighted the importance of a national investment bank, a national education service that provides universal free childcare and ongoing skills training, and stronger trade unions.
"Our opposition cannot be limited to the parliamentary chambers and TV studios of Westminster," he wrote. "Labour is best when it is a movement, which has swelled to an enthusiastic 600,000 who will decide this leadership election. Once that is over, we face a bigger task: to force this government to abandon its free-market dogma and become the strategic state our society needs."
The Independent reported Monday that Corbyn said the Labour Party should set up a fund to help low-income people become members of Parliament. "If the party is to win back the five million predominantly working-class voters lost since 1997, then we must reflect those we seek to represent," the candidate reportedly argued. "It is not enough to be for working people--we have to be of working people as well."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Even as the mainstream media and members of his own party seek to portray Labour leader hopeful Jeremy Corbyn as uncredible on economic policy, a group of more than 40 leading economists wrote a paper this weekend. They seek to counter that narrative by publicly supporting key planks of his anti-austerity platform.
"His opposition to austerity is mainstream economics," the economists wrote in an open letter published Sunday. "Despite the barrage of media coverage to the contrary, the current government's policy and its objectives are extreme."
The letter clarifies that its signatories "are not all supporters of Jeremy Corbyn," who is currently the frontrunner in the leadership contest according to national polls.
"But we hope to clarify just where the 'extremism' lies in the current economic debate," they continued, blasting harsh spending cuts and privatization embraced by current Labour leaders.
Meanwhile, on Sunday, Corbyn detailed his economic strategy in the Observer, criticizing "an absentee government" that has produced "yawning inequality" in the UK.
"Parliament can feel like living in a time warp at the best of times," he wrote, "but this government is not just replaying 2010, but taking us back to 1979: ideologically committed to rolling back the state, attacking workers' rights and trade union protection, selling off public assets and extending the sell-off to social housing."
Corbyn highlighted the importance of a national investment bank, a national education service that provides universal free childcare and ongoing skills training, and stronger trade unions.
"Our opposition cannot be limited to the parliamentary chambers and TV studios of Westminster," he wrote. "Labour is best when it is a movement, which has swelled to an enthusiastic 600,000 who will decide this leadership election. Once that is over, we face a bigger task: to force this government to abandon its free-market dogma and become the strategic state our society needs."
The Independent reported Monday that Corbyn said the Labour Party should set up a fund to help low-income people become members of Parliament. "If the party is to win back the five million predominantly working-class voters lost since 1997, then we must reflect those we seek to represent," the candidate reportedly argued. "It is not enough to be for working people--we have to be of working people as well."
Even as the mainstream media and members of his own party seek to portray Labour leader hopeful Jeremy Corbyn as uncredible on economic policy, a group of more than 40 leading economists wrote a paper this weekend. They seek to counter that narrative by publicly supporting key planks of his anti-austerity platform.
"His opposition to austerity is mainstream economics," the economists wrote in an open letter published Sunday. "Despite the barrage of media coverage to the contrary, the current government's policy and its objectives are extreme."
The letter clarifies that its signatories "are not all supporters of Jeremy Corbyn," who is currently the frontrunner in the leadership contest according to national polls.
"But we hope to clarify just where the 'extremism' lies in the current economic debate," they continued, blasting harsh spending cuts and privatization embraced by current Labour leaders.
Meanwhile, on Sunday, Corbyn detailed his economic strategy in the Observer, criticizing "an absentee government" that has produced "yawning inequality" in the UK.
"Parliament can feel like living in a time warp at the best of times," he wrote, "but this government is not just replaying 2010, but taking us back to 1979: ideologically committed to rolling back the state, attacking workers' rights and trade union protection, selling off public assets and extending the sell-off to social housing."
Corbyn highlighted the importance of a national investment bank, a national education service that provides universal free childcare and ongoing skills training, and stronger trade unions.
"Our opposition cannot be limited to the parliamentary chambers and TV studios of Westminster," he wrote. "Labour is best when it is a movement, which has swelled to an enthusiastic 600,000 who will decide this leadership election. Once that is over, we face a bigger task: to force this government to abandon its free-market dogma and become the strategic state our society needs."
The Independent reported Monday that Corbyn said the Labour Party should set up a fund to help low-income people become members of Parliament. "If the party is to win back the five million predominantly working-class voters lost since 1997, then we must reflect those we seek to represent," the candidate reportedly argued. "It is not enough to be for working people--we have to be of working people as well."