SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Brothers in Arms: Jeb Bush Won't Say 'No' To Future Torture
'This is what happens when you don't prosecute officials for illegally torturing people.'
Aug 14, 2015
While also foregoing the opportunity to condemn the establishment of a torture program authorized and ordered by his brother, Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush has said he won't rule out the future use of torture if he becomes commander-in-chief and deems it necessary.
"I don't want to make a definitive, blanket kind of statement," Jeb Bush told an audience of potential voters in Iowa on Thursday in response to a question regarding the use of torture ordered by former president George W. Bush and the executive order put in place by President Barack Obama that explicitly ended the agency's abusive interrogation program.
According to various reports on the exchange, Bush suggested there may be occasions when brutal behavior--which under his brother's watch included severe beatings, waterboarding, prolonged sleep deprivation inside cramped boxes, death threats against family members, and "much worse"--may be necessary "to keep the country safe." That's why, he reportedly stated, "I'm not saying in every condition, under every possible scenario," he would reject the use of torture.
"True to his family values," scoffed The Nation's John Nichols on Twitter in response, "Jeb Bush just can't rule out torture."
Later in the day, according to the Guardian, Jeb Bush said there was a difference between enhanced interrogation and torture but declined to be specific. "I don't know. I'm just saying if I'm going to be president of the United States, you take this threat seriously."
These kinds of responses, according to Trevor Timm of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, is "what happens when you don't prosecute officials for illegally torturing people."
Though many political commentators often discuss the challenge Jeb will face when it comes to distancing himself from his brother's legacy, Timm suggests that Jeb can certainly (and increasingly) be judged on his public comments, especially regarding foreign policy. So far, Timm observed in a subsequent tweet, the American people have learned from Jeb Bush that his foreign policy could be summarized with these key points: "Maybe send more troops to Iraq, rip up the Iran deal and maybe bomb them, and maybe torture more people."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
election 2016executive orderforeign policygeorge w. bushhuman rightsiran dealjeb bushjohn nicholsrepublican partytorturewar on terror
While also foregoing the opportunity to condemn the establishment of a torture program authorized and ordered by his brother, Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush has said he won't rule out the future use of torture if he becomes commander-in-chief and deems it necessary.
"I don't want to make a definitive, blanket kind of statement," Jeb Bush told an audience of potential voters in Iowa on Thursday in response to a question regarding the use of torture ordered by former president George W. Bush and the executive order put in place by President Barack Obama that explicitly ended the agency's abusive interrogation program.
According to various reports on the exchange, Bush suggested there may be occasions when brutal behavior--which under his brother's watch included severe beatings, waterboarding, prolonged sleep deprivation inside cramped boxes, death threats against family members, and "much worse"--may be necessary "to keep the country safe." That's why, he reportedly stated, "I'm not saying in every condition, under every possible scenario," he would reject the use of torture.
"True to his family values," scoffed The Nation's John Nichols on Twitter in response, "Jeb Bush just can't rule out torture."
Later in the day, according to the Guardian, Jeb Bush said there was a difference between enhanced interrogation and torture but declined to be specific. "I don't know. I'm just saying if I'm going to be president of the United States, you take this threat seriously."
These kinds of responses, according to Trevor Timm of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, is "what happens when you don't prosecute officials for illegally torturing people."
Though many political commentators often discuss the challenge Jeb will face when it comes to distancing himself from his brother's legacy, Timm suggests that Jeb can certainly (and increasingly) be judged on his public comments, especially regarding foreign policy. So far, Timm observed in a subsequent tweet, the American people have learned from Jeb Bush that his foreign policy could be summarized with these key points: "Maybe send more troops to Iraq, rip up the Iran deal and maybe bomb them, and maybe torture more people."
While also foregoing the opportunity to condemn the establishment of a torture program authorized and ordered by his brother, Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush has said he won't rule out the future use of torture if he becomes commander-in-chief and deems it necessary.
"I don't want to make a definitive, blanket kind of statement," Jeb Bush told an audience of potential voters in Iowa on Thursday in response to a question regarding the use of torture ordered by former president George W. Bush and the executive order put in place by President Barack Obama that explicitly ended the agency's abusive interrogation program.
According to various reports on the exchange, Bush suggested there may be occasions when brutal behavior--which under his brother's watch included severe beatings, waterboarding, prolonged sleep deprivation inside cramped boxes, death threats against family members, and "much worse"--may be necessary "to keep the country safe." That's why, he reportedly stated, "I'm not saying in every condition, under every possible scenario," he would reject the use of torture.
"True to his family values," scoffed The Nation's John Nichols on Twitter in response, "Jeb Bush just can't rule out torture."
Later in the day, according to the Guardian, Jeb Bush said there was a difference between enhanced interrogation and torture but declined to be specific. "I don't know. I'm just saying if I'm going to be president of the United States, you take this threat seriously."
These kinds of responses, according to Trevor Timm of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, is "what happens when you don't prosecute officials for illegally torturing people."
Though many political commentators often discuss the challenge Jeb will face when it comes to distancing himself from his brother's legacy, Timm suggests that Jeb can certainly (and increasingly) be judged on his public comments, especially regarding foreign policy. So far, Timm observed in a subsequent tweet, the American people have learned from Jeb Bush that his foreign policy could be summarized with these key points: "Maybe send more troops to Iraq, rip up the Iran deal and maybe bomb them, and maybe torture more people."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.