The amount of methane being leaked from natural gas production sites has been hugely underestimated, according to a \u0022bombshell\u0022 new study released on Tuesday.In a paper published at Energy \u0026amp; Science Engineering, expert and gas industry consultant Touché Howard argues that a much-heralded 2013 study by the University of Texas relied on a faulty measurement instrument, the Bacharach Hi-Flow Sampler (BHFS), causing its findings to low-ball actual emission rates \u0022by factors of three to five.\u0022\u0022The data reported by the University of Texas study suggest their measurements exhibit this sensor failure, as shown by the paucity of high-emitting observations when the wellhead gas composition was less than 91% CH4, where sensor failures are most likely,\u0022 Howard writes, \u0022during follow-up testing, the BHFS used in that study indeed exhibited sensor failure consistent with under-reporting of these high emitters.\u0022Jamie Henn, communications director for 350.org called Howard\u0026#039;s findings a \u0022bombshell,\u0022 adding: \u0022The more we learn about fracking, the worse it is for the environment.\u0022If Howard is correct, the study throws into question countless other estimates of methane emissions from natural gas production through hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which has been hailed as a low-emission energy solution.Since 2003, natural gas companies have often shared BHFS recordings with the Environmental Protection Agency to help compile a national greenhouse gas inventory.\u0022If Howard\u0026#039;s right, we\u0026#039;ll need to review other emission estimates used in EPA inventories,\u0022 Robert Jackson, an earth science professor at Stanford University who studies methane leaks, told Inside Climate News. \u0022We need to sort this out as quickly as possible.\u0022The study comes just a day after President Barack Obama unveiled his new climate plan, which calls for an increase in natural gas production to balance cuts in carbon emissions. However, scientists have long warned that methane is potentially even more destructive that other fossil fuel emissions. According to the Environmental Defense Fund, in the first two decades after its release, methane is 84 times more potent than carbon dioxide.The backpack-sized BHFS has two sensors: one for measuring low level methane emissions and one for higher levels as the gas rises. According to Howard, who happens to hold the patent for some of the technology used in the Bacharach product, unless the sampler is carefully and frequently recalibrated, the switchover from the first sensor to the second can fail, causing an under reporting of total emissions.\u0026nbsp;Further, Howard notes that without independent measurement at the time of the malfunction, \u0022there is no way to determine the magnitude\u0022 of the error. Therefore, the missed emissions could be as high as ten- to a hundredfold for a particularly large leak, he said.