SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sen. Claire McCaskill, of Missouri, says the media is "not giving the same scrutiny to Bernie Sanders that they are giving to certainly Hillary Clinton and the other candidates."
In a move viewed as further evidence of Sen. Bernie Sanders' continued momentum in the polls and among potential voters in the 2016 presidential election, some Hillary Clinton supporters have gone on the offense against the self-described democratic socialist.
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), a Clinton backer, launched what The Hill described as "the sharpest attack yet" on Sanders in a television appearance on Thursday.
"Bernie is too liberal to gather enough votes in this country to become president," she told MSNBC's "Morning Joe."
McCaskill assailed Sanders for having "an extreme message" and being "unrealistic," while complaining that the media were "not giving the same scrutiny to Bernie Sanders that they are giving to certainly Hillary Clinton and the other candidates."
Asked to name three issues she thinks Sanders is 'too far left, too Socialist" on, McCaskill said:
"He would like to see Medicare for all in this country, have everybody have a government insurance policy, I don't think most Americans want government to have every insurance policy... He would like to see expansion of entitlement. He is not worried about a debt at all. He is somebody who is, I think, frankly, against trade. Against a lot of things unrealistic in this day and age."
Though McCaskill endorsed then-Sen. Barack Obama in 2008, Politico reports that she "endorsed Clinton's 2016 bid almost exactly two years ago, in June 2013, making her one of the former secretary of state's earliest major Democratic backers."
The statements came as recent opinion polls have shown support for Sanders building in early battleground states such as New Hampshire and Iowa.
Sanders subsequently struck back in an interview with Bloomberg Politics' Mark Halperin and John Heilemann, calling into question McCaskill's progressive bona fides. "Do I believe, in opposition to Senator McCaskill, that we need trade policies that are fair to the American worker, and not just benefit CEOs and large corporations?" Sanders said. "I plead guilty."
Meanwhile, the Sanders camp is claiming the attacks as a sort of victory.
"When your opponents and people who represent them wade into the conversation with attacks against you, for us it's a recognition of the fact that something must be working," Tad Devine, a senior adviser to Sanders, told The Hill. "It's a basic rule in politics that you don't attack somebody if they are not doing well."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a move viewed as further evidence of Sen. Bernie Sanders' continued momentum in the polls and among potential voters in the 2016 presidential election, some Hillary Clinton supporters have gone on the offense against the self-described democratic socialist.
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), a Clinton backer, launched what The Hill described as "the sharpest attack yet" on Sanders in a television appearance on Thursday.
"Bernie is too liberal to gather enough votes in this country to become president," she told MSNBC's "Morning Joe."
McCaskill assailed Sanders for having "an extreme message" and being "unrealistic," while complaining that the media were "not giving the same scrutiny to Bernie Sanders that they are giving to certainly Hillary Clinton and the other candidates."
Asked to name three issues she thinks Sanders is 'too far left, too Socialist" on, McCaskill said:
"He would like to see Medicare for all in this country, have everybody have a government insurance policy, I don't think most Americans want government to have every insurance policy... He would like to see expansion of entitlement. He is not worried about a debt at all. He is somebody who is, I think, frankly, against trade. Against a lot of things unrealistic in this day and age."
Though McCaskill endorsed then-Sen. Barack Obama in 2008, Politico reports that she "endorsed Clinton's 2016 bid almost exactly two years ago, in June 2013, making her one of the former secretary of state's earliest major Democratic backers."
The statements came as recent opinion polls have shown support for Sanders building in early battleground states such as New Hampshire and Iowa.
Sanders subsequently struck back in an interview with Bloomberg Politics' Mark Halperin and John Heilemann, calling into question McCaskill's progressive bona fides. "Do I believe, in opposition to Senator McCaskill, that we need trade policies that are fair to the American worker, and not just benefit CEOs and large corporations?" Sanders said. "I plead guilty."
Meanwhile, the Sanders camp is claiming the attacks as a sort of victory.
"When your opponents and people who represent them wade into the conversation with attacks against you, for us it's a recognition of the fact that something must be working," Tad Devine, a senior adviser to Sanders, told The Hill. "It's a basic rule in politics that you don't attack somebody if they are not doing well."
In a move viewed as further evidence of Sen. Bernie Sanders' continued momentum in the polls and among potential voters in the 2016 presidential election, some Hillary Clinton supporters have gone on the offense against the self-described democratic socialist.
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), a Clinton backer, launched what The Hill described as "the sharpest attack yet" on Sanders in a television appearance on Thursday.
"Bernie is too liberal to gather enough votes in this country to become president," she told MSNBC's "Morning Joe."
McCaskill assailed Sanders for having "an extreme message" and being "unrealistic," while complaining that the media were "not giving the same scrutiny to Bernie Sanders that they are giving to certainly Hillary Clinton and the other candidates."
Asked to name three issues she thinks Sanders is 'too far left, too Socialist" on, McCaskill said:
"He would like to see Medicare for all in this country, have everybody have a government insurance policy, I don't think most Americans want government to have every insurance policy... He would like to see expansion of entitlement. He is not worried about a debt at all. He is somebody who is, I think, frankly, against trade. Against a lot of things unrealistic in this day and age."
Though McCaskill endorsed then-Sen. Barack Obama in 2008, Politico reports that she "endorsed Clinton's 2016 bid almost exactly two years ago, in June 2013, making her one of the former secretary of state's earliest major Democratic backers."
The statements came as recent opinion polls have shown support for Sanders building in early battleground states such as New Hampshire and Iowa.
Sanders subsequently struck back in an interview with Bloomberg Politics' Mark Halperin and John Heilemann, calling into question McCaskill's progressive bona fides. "Do I believe, in opposition to Senator McCaskill, that we need trade policies that are fair to the American worker, and not just benefit CEOs and large corporations?" Sanders said. "I plead guilty."
Meanwhile, the Sanders camp is claiming the attacks as a sort of victory.
"When your opponents and people who represent them wade into the conversation with attacks against you, for us it's a recognition of the fact that something must be working," Tad Devine, a senior adviser to Sanders, told The Hill. "It's a basic rule in politics that you don't attack somebody if they are not doing well."