SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sens. Harry Reid and Rand Paul both voted against CISA on Thursday. (Photo: AP/Politico)
'Facade' Anti-Hacking Amendment Fails in Senate
Senators reject cybersecurity bill that civil liberties groups warned was a threat to privacy rights
Jun 12, 2015
The U.S. Senate on Thursday quietly blocked Republicans from adding the controversial anti-hacking measure known as the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (CISA) to the defense bill currently under consideration by Congress.
CISA's fate is now unclear. The bill, which would grant intelligence agencies additional access to consumers' private data, was introduced by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), but fell four votes short of the necessary 60 to move forward in that way.
As introduced, CISA would not have allowed any changes to the language of the legislation, which some senators cited as a reason they voted against it.
"There is no good reason for doing it this way," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said on the floor ahead of the vote. If CISA could be discussed as its own separate measure, rather than as an add-on to another bill, senators could propose and discuss making changes to the language, Reid added.
"It's a false promise, it's a facade," he said.
Civil liberties organizations opposed the bill as a measure that would open up yet more avenues for intelligence agencies and private companies to violate privacy rights of users. They also noted that attaching it to the NDAA and preventing any changes to the language would have quashed much-needed deliberation over the bill's many civil liberties issues.
As the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) wrote in a blog post on June 9, "This move would almost certainly stifle necessary debate on the privacy and civil liberties problems in the bill and thwart amendments that Senators have been crafting to address those problems."
According to a letter written to senators by a coalition of civil society organizations, security experts, and academics--including CDT, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the ACLU, the Sunlight Foundation, and Free Press, among others--the problems with the bill include:
- Automatic NSA access to personal information shared with a governmental entity;
- Inadequate protections prior to sharing;
- Dangerous authorization for countermeasures; and
- Overbroad authorization for law enforcement use.
Three Republican lawmakers crossed party lines to vote against CISA, including Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, and Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada. As The Hill notes, those who pushed for CISA to pass admitted on Thursday that they have no fallback plans for the bill.
"We have a plan A and a plan B," Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) said ahead of the vote. "Our plan B is plan A."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The U.S. Senate on Thursday quietly blocked Republicans from adding the controversial anti-hacking measure known as the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (CISA) to the defense bill currently under consideration by Congress.
CISA's fate is now unclear. The bill, which would grant intelligence agencies additional access to consumers' private data, was introduced by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), but fell four votes short of the necessary 60 to move forward in that way.
As introduced, CISA would not have allowed any changes to the language of the legislation, which some senators cited as a reason they voted against it.
"There is no good reason for doing it this way," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said on the floor ahead of the vote. If CISA could be discussed as its own separate measure, rather than as an add-on to another bill, senators could propose and discuss making changes to the language, Reid added.
"It's a false promise, it's a facade," he said.
Civil liberties organizations opposed the bill as a measure that would open up yet more avenues for intelligence agencies and private companies to violate privacy rights of users. They also noted that attaching it to the NDAA and preventing any changes to the language would have quashed much-needed deliberation over the bill's many civil liberties issues.
As the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) wrote in a blog post on June 9, "This move would almost certainly stifle necessary debate on the privacy and civil liberties problems in the bill and thwart amendments that Senators have been crafting to address those problems."
According to a letter written to senators by a coalition of civil society organizations, security experts, and academics--including CDT, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the ACLU, the Sunlight Foundation, and Free Press, among others--the problems with the bill include:
- Automatic NSA access to personal information shared with a governmental entity;
- Inadequate protections prior to sharing;
- Dangerous authorization for countermeasures; and
- Overbroad authorization for law enforcement use.
Three Republican lawmakers crossed party lines to vote against CISA, including Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, and Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada. As The Hill notes, those who pushed for CISA to pass admitted on Thursday that they have no fallback plans for the bill.
"We have a plan A and a plan B," Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) said ahead of the vote. "Our plan B is plan A."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The U.S. Senate on Thursday quietly blocked Republicans from adding the controversial anti-hacking measure known as the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (CISA) to the defense bill currently under consideration by Congress.
CISA's fate is now unclear. The bill, which would grant intelligence agencies additional access to consumers' private data, was introduced by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), but fell four votes short of the necessary 60 to move forward in that way.
As introduced, CISA would not have allowed any changes to the language of the legislation, which some senators cited as a reason they voted against it.
"There is no good reason for doing it this way," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said on the floor ahead of the vote. If CISA could be discussed as its own separate measure, rather than as an add-on to another bill, senators could propose and discuss making changes to the language, Reid added.
"It's a false promise, it's a facade," he said.
Civil liberties organizations opposed the bill as a measure that would open up yet more avenues for intelligence agencies and private companies to violate privacy rights of users. They also noted that attaching it to the NDAA and preventing any changes to the language would have quashed much-needed deliberation over the bill's many civil liberties issues.
As the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) wrote in a blog post on June 9, "This move would almost certainly stifle necessary debate on the privacy and civil liberties problems in the bill and thwart amendments that Senators have been crafting to address those problems."
According to a letter written to senators by a coalition of civil society organizations, security experts, and academics--including CDT, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the ACLU, the Sunlight Foundation, and Free Press, among others--the problems with the bill include:
- Automatic NSA access to personal information shared with a governmental entity;
- Inadequate protections prior to sharing;
- Dangerous authorization for countermeasures; and
- Overbroad authorization for law enforcement use.
Three Republican lawmakers crossed party lines to vote against CISA, including Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, and Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada. As The Hill notes, those who pushed for CISA to pass admitted on Thursday that they have no fallback plans for the bill.
"We have a plan A and a plan B," Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) said ahead of the vote. "Our plan B is plan A."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.