SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
China Slams US For Knee-Jerk Accusations over Massive Hacking Attack
News comes just one day after revelations that the Obama administration has expanded the NSA's warrantless surveillance to combat hacking
Jun 05, 2015
An army of "unnamed" U.S. officials on Friday were quick to allege that Chinese hackers were responsible for a breach of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)'s computer system in December, which compromised the data of about 4 million current and former federal employees.
China's foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei said the accusations were "irresponsible and unscientific" at a news briefing on Friday. "We know that hacker attacks are conducted anonymously, across nations, and that it is hard to track the source. It's irresponsible and unscientific to make conjectural, trumped-up allegations without deep investigation."
He added: "We wish the United States would not be full of suspicions, catching wind and shadows, but rather have a larger measure of trust and cooperation."
We Interrupt This Article with an Urgent Message! Common Dreams is a not-for-profit organization. We fund our news team by pooling together many small contributions from our readers. No advertising. No selling our readers' information. No reliance on big donations from the 1%. This allows us to maintain the editorial independence that our readers rely on. But this media model only works if enough readers pitch in.
|
According to NBC News, unidentified U.S. officials "said the breach--which exploited a 'zero day' vulnerability, meaning one that was previously unknown--could be the biggest cyberattack in U.S. history, potentially affecting every agency of the U.S. government."
U.S. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) was among those pointing fingers at China. "The ramifications are very serious," said Collins, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee. "Potentially 4 million former and current federal employees have had their information compromised, and because OPM is the [agency] that holds security clearances, that's giving a potential enemy like China very valuable information."
Unnamed intelligence officials told CNN that "hackers working for the Chinese military are believed to be compiling a massive database of Americans," though it was unclear what the purpose of such a database would be--and doubly unclear why CNN would report the unsubstantiated claims of unnamed "intelligence officials."
The hack comes just one day after the New York Times and ProPublica revealed that the Obama administration has expanded the NSA's warrantless surveillance of Americans' international Internet traffic to search for evidence of malicious computer hacking.
And as The Hill notes, "Within minutes of the story breaking, lawmakers were using the OPM breach to renew calls for the Senate to move on a stalled cybersecurity bill that would enhance the public-private exchange of information on hackers."
Agence France-Press reports:
The United States has struck an increasingly strident tone about cyber-attacks in recent months.
Admiral Michael Rogers, who heads the National Security Agency and US Cyber Command, has said that future attacks could prompt a response with conventional weapons.
In February, US Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said a steady stream of low-level cyber-attacks posed the most likely danger to the United States, rather than a potential digital "armageddon."
As for how the breach occurred and was detected in the first place, the Associated Press reports:
[The Department of Homeland Security] said its intrusion detection system, known as EINSTEIN, which screens federal Internet traffic to identify potential cyberthreats, identified the hack of OPM's systems and the Interior Department's data center, which is shared by other federal agencies.
It was unclear why the EINSTEIN system didn't detect the breach until after so many records had been copied and removed.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
An army of "unnamed" U.S. officials on Friday were quick to allege that Chinese hackers were responsible for a breach of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)'s computer system in December, which compromised the data of about 4 million current and former federal employees.
China's foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei said the accusations were "irresponsible and unscientific" at a news briefing on Friday. "We know that hacker attacks are conducted anonymously, across nations, and that it is hard to track the source. It's irresponsible and unscientific to make conjectural, trumped-up allegations without deep investigation."
He added: "We wish the United States would not be full of suspicions, catching wind and shadows, but rather have a larger measure of trust and cooperation."
We Interrupt This Article with an Urgent Message! Common Dreams is a not-for-profit organization. We fund our news team by pooling together many small contributions from our readers. No advertising. No selling our readers' information. No reliance on big donations from the 1%. This allows us to maintain the editorial independence that our readers rely on. But this media model only works if enough readers pitch in.
|
According to NBC News, unidentified U.S. officials "said the breach--which exploited a 'zero day' vulnerability, meaning one that was previously unknown--could be the biggest cyberattack in U.S. history, potentially affecting every agency of the U.S. government."
U.S. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) was among those pointing fingers at China. "The ramifications are very serious," said Collins, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee. "Potentially 4 million former and current federal employees have had their information compromised, and because OPM is the [agency] that holds security clearances, that's giving a potential enemy like China very valuable information."
Unnamed intelligence officials told CNN that "hackers working for the Chinese military are believed to be compiling a massive database of Americans," though it was unclear what the purpose of such a database would be--and doubly unclear why CNN would report the unsubstantiated claims of unnamed "intelligence officials."
The hack comes just one day after the New York Times and ProPublica revealed that the Obama administration has expanded the NSA's warrantless surveillance of Americans' international Internet traffic to search for evidence of malicious computer hacking.
And as The Hill notes, "Within minutes of the story breaking, lawmakers were using the OPM breach to renew calls for the Senate to move on a stalled cybersecurity bill that would enhance the public-private exchange of information on hackers."
Agence France-Press reports:
The United States has struck an increasingly strident tone about cyber-attacks in recent months.
Admiral Michael Rogers, who heads the National Security Agency and US Cyber Command, has said that future attacks could prompt a response with conventional weapons.
In February, US Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said a steady stream of low-level cyber-attacks posed the most likely danger to the United States, rather than a potential digital "armageddon."
As for how the breach occurred and was detected in the first place, the Associated Press reports:
[The Department of Homeland Security] said its intrusion detection system, known as EINSTEIN, which screens federal Internet traffic to identify potential cyberthreats, identified the hack of OPM's systems and the Interior Department's data center, which is shared by other federal agencies.
It was unclear why the EINSTEIN system didn't detect the breach until after so many records had been copied and removed.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
An army of "unnamed" U.S. officials on Friday were quick to allege that Chinese hackers were responsible for a breach of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)'s computer system in December, which compromised the data of about 4 million current and former federal employees.
China's foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei said the accusations were "irresponsible and unscientific" at a news briefing on Friday. "We know that hacker attacks are conducted anonymously, across nations, and that it is hard to track the source. It's irresponsible and unscientific to make conjectural, trumped-up allegations without deep investigation."
He added: "We wish the United States would not be full of suspicions, catching wind and shadows, but rather have a larger measure of trust and cooperation."
We Interrupt This Article with an Urgent Message! Common Dreams is a not-for-profit organization. We fund our news team by pooling together many small contributions from our readers. No advertising. No selling our readers' information. No reliance on big donations from the 1%. This allows us to maintain the editorial independence that our readers rely on. But this media model only works if enough readers pitch in.
|
According to NBC News, unidentified U.S. officials "said the breach--which exploited a 'zero day' vulnerability, meaning one that was previously unknown--could be the biggest cyberattack in U.S. history, potentially affecting every agency of the U.S. government."
U.S. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) was among those pointing fingers at China. "The ramifications are very serious," said Collins, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee. "Potentially 4 million former and current federal employees have had their information compromised, and because OPM is the [agency] that holds security clearances, that's giving a potential enemy like China very valuable information."
Unnamed intelligence officials told CNN that "hackers working for the Chinese military are believed to be compiling a massive database of Americans," though it was unclear what the purpose of such a database would be--and doubly unclear why CNN would report the unsubstantiated claims of unnamed "intelligence officials."
The hack comes just one day after the New York Times and ProPublica revealed that the Obama administration has expanded the NSA's warrantless surveillance of Americans' international Internet traffic to search for evidence of malicious computer hacking.
And as The Hill notes, "Within minutes of the story breaking, lawmakers were using the OPM breach to renew calls for the Senate to move on a stalled cybersecurity bill that would enhance the public-private exchange of information on hackers."
Agence France-Press reports:
The United States has struck an increasingly strident tone about cyber-attacks in recent months.
Admiral Michael Rogers, who heads the National Security Agency and US Cyber Command, has said that future attacks could prompt a response with conventional weapons.
In February, US Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said a steady stream of low-level cyber-attacks posed the most likely danger to the United States, rather than a potential digital "armageddon."
As for how the breach occurred and was detected in the first place, the Associated Press reports:
[The Department of Homeland Security] said its intrusion detection system, known as EINSTEIN, which screens federal Internet traffic to identify potential cyberthreats, identified the hack of OPM's systems and the Interior Department's data center, which is shared by other federal agencies.
It was unclear why the EINSTEIN system didn't detect the breach until after so many records had been copied and removed.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy