How Do Big Backers of Clinton Convince Rich Liberals to Give Them Money? Read the Memo
"It is no secret that Sec. Clinton is fair-left and not far-left," says internal memo. But what do her centrist supporters really want to talk about?
Would you like to know the kind of strategic thinking that's going on inside the mind of one of Hillary Clinton's top campaign operatives?
According to a document obtained by Politico and published on Tuesday, David Brock--a top Democratic strategist and described by the newspaper as a "Clinton enforcer"--created a Q&A-style memo designed to convince "unenthusiastic" but wealthy progressives why they should write sizeable checks to outside groups backing candidacy of the former U.S. senator and secretary of state.
The document, it appears, was prepared ahead of a meeting of left-leaning wealthy donors, known as the Democracy Alliance, that took place in San Francisco earlier this year. In form, the memo sees Brock anticipating the kind of questions these wealthy donors might ask and then provides his planned response. Overall, the guiding light of Brock's strategy is to argue that that wealthy liberals should back Clinton not because they love her overall policy agenda, but because she is simply the candidate most capable of tackling the regressive forces of the right-wing billionaire brothers David and Charles Koch.
As Politico reports, "The memo suggests that Brock, who has built a fleet of deep-pocketed groups aligned with Clinton, is taking a conciliatory approach to assuage donors' concerns - conceding she's not as liberal as some donors wish, but emphasizing her progressiveness in public service and minimizing the prospects of a vigorous Democratic primary."
For example, he imagines a skeptical donor asking, "Aren't we going to have a hard time going after the Kochs' big money when some could argue that Sec. Clinton is bankrolled by Wall Street and therefore there is a pox on both their houses?"
The answer: "It is no secret that Sec. Clinton is fair-left and not far-left. I think it is safe to say that there will be a dramatic difference between Sec. Clinton and whoever is the Republican opponent. She has spent a lifetime advocating for women and children and fighting for the middle class and there is not one GOP candidate who has that record."
Though placed in a section titled "less likely" to be asked, Brock addressed the question about whether or not the Democratic Party needs to have a "vigorous debate" during the primary season--specifically concerning the gap between candidates like Clinton and much more progressive members of the party like Sen. Elizabeth Warren--by coming up with a dodge for the question. "Our job is to focus on the Koch brothers, exposing their self-serving agenda and making their spending a liability for Republicans."
Or in other words: No.
The document is embedded below and can be read in full:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Would you like to know the kind of strategic thinking that's going on inside the mind of one of Hillary Clinton's top campaign operatives?
According to a document obtained by Politico and published on Tuesday, David Brock--a top Democratic strategist and described by the newspaper as a "Clinton enforcer"--created a Q&A-style memo designed to convince "unenthusiastic" but wealthy progressives why they should write sizeable checks to outside groups backing candidacy of the former U.S. senator and secretary of state.
The document, it appears, was prepared ahead of a meeting of left-leaning wealthy donors, known as the Democracy Alliance, that took place in San Francisco earlier this year. In form, the memo sees Brock anticipating the kind of questions these wealthy donors might ask and then provides his planned response. Overall, the guiding light of Brock's strategy is to argue that that wealthy liberals should back Clinton not because they love her overall policy agenda, but because she is simply the candidate most capable of tackling the regressive forces of the right-wing billionaire brothers David and Charles Koch.
As Politico reports, "The memo suggests that Brock, who has built a fleet of deep-pocketed groups aligned with Clinton, is taking a conciliatory approach to assuage donors' concerns - conceding she's not as liberal as some donors wish, but emphasizing her progressiveness in public service and minimizing the prospects of a vigorous Democratic primary."
For example, he imagines a skeptical donor asking, "Aren't we going to have a hard time going after the Kochs' big money when some could argue that Sec. Clinton is bankrolled by Wall Street and therefore there is a pox on both their houses?"
The answer: "It is no secret that Sec. Clinton is fair-left and not far-left. I think it is safe to say that there will be a dramatic difference between Sec. Clinton and whoever is the Republican opponent. She has spent a lifetime advocating for women and children and fighting for the middle class and there is not one GOP candidate who has that record."
Though placed in a section titled "less likely" to be asked, Brock addressed the question about whether or not the Democratic Party needs to have a "vigorous debate" during the primary season--specifically concerning the gap between candidates like Clinton and much more progressive members of the party like Sen. Elizabeth Warren--by coming up with a dodge for the question. "Our job is to focus on the Koch brothers, exposing their self-serving agenda and making their spending a liability for Republicans."
Or in other words: No.
The document is embedded below and can be read in full:
Would you like to know the kind of strategic thinking that's going on inside the mind of one of Hillary Clinton's top campaign operatives?
According to a document obtained by Politico and published on Tuesday, David Brock--a top Democratic strategist and described by the newspaper as a "Clinton enforcer"--created a Q&A-style memo designed to convince "unenthusiastic" but wealthy progressives why they should write sizeable checks to outside groups backing candidacy of the former U.S. senator and secretary of state.
The document, it appears, was prepared ahead of a meeting of left-leaning wealthy donors, known as the Democracy Alliance, that took place in San Francisco earlier this year. In form, the memo sees Brock anticipating the kind of questions these wealthy donors might ask and then provides his planned response. Overall, the guiding light of Brock's strategy is to argue that that wealthy liberals should back Clinton not because they love her overall policy agenda, but because she is simply the candidate most capable of tackling the regressive forces of the right-wing billionaire brothers David and Charles Koch.
As Politico reports, "The memo suggests that Brock, who has built a fleet of deep-pocketed groups aligned with Clinton, is taking a conciliatory approach to assuage donors' concerns - conceding she's not as liberal as some donors wish, but emphasizing her progressiveness in public service and minimizing the prospects of a vigorous Democratic primary."
For example, he imagines a skeptical donor asking, "Aren't we going to have a hard time going after the Kochs' big money when some could argue that Sec. Clinton is bankrolled by Wall Street and therefore there is a pox on both their houses?"
The answer: "It is no secret that Sec. Clinton is fair-left and not far-left. I think it is safe to say that there will be a dramatic difference between Sec. Clinton and whoever is the Republican opponent. She has spent a lifetime advocating for women and children and fighting for the middle class and there is not one GOP candidate who has that record."
Though placed in a section titled "less likely" to be asked, Brock addressed the question about whether or not the Democratic Party needs to have a "vigorous debate" during the primary season--specifically concerning the gap between candidates like Clinton and much more progressive members of the party like Sen. Elizabeth Warren--by coming up with a dodge for the question. "Our job is to focus on the Koch brothers, exposing their self-serving agenda and making their spending a liability for Republicans."
Or in other words: No.
The document is embedded below and can be read in full: