May 26, 2015
Drilling the Russian Arctic. Expanding tar sands exploitation in Alberta. Exploring for oil in the South China Sea. These are just a few of the capital-intensive fossil fuel extraction projects that are translating into direct bonus payouts to the CEO's at the helm of the largest oil corporations in the world, The Guardian revealed in a report released Monday.
Exxon Mobil, Shell, Chevron, Total, and BP are rewarding CEOs for tapping new markets, despite warnings from scientists that the vast majority of fossil fuels must remain in the ground in order to stave off the worst of the climate crisis.
These payouts are being made amid the dramatic rise in "upstream activities," defined in the report as investment "focused on colossal engineering projects to bring reserves on tap and, to a lesser extent, on exploration."
"Multi-billion-dollar capital projects amount to huge, long-term bets by the big five that exorbitant costs associated with unlocking hydrocarbon reserves in some of the most inaccessible locations on the planet can eventually be recouped and converted into profits," state journalists Simon Bowers and Harry Davies, citing company reports. "Bonuses for chief executives at all five firms are tied to the achievement of delivery milestones in the construction and deployment of such projects."
The Guardian's analysis draws a direct line between fossil fuel extraction projects and CEOs' accrual of massive amounts of personal wealth:
Shell's Ben van Beurden, for example, last year received a pay deal worth $32.2m, including bonuses linked to delivering "a high proportion of flagship projects on time and on budget". These are thought to include four platforms floating 1,000 metres or more above deepwater wells in the Gulf of Mexico, Gulf of Guinea and South China Sea.
Similarly, BP's Bob Dudley was awarded a pay deal worth $15.3m, with bonuses linked to seven "major projects", thought to include Sunrise, a tar sands joint venture in Canada, as well as projects in Angola, Azerbaijan, the Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea.
The boss of Exxon, Rex Tillerson, was paid $33.1m last year including bonus payouts linked to projects including the first well in the Kara Sea, in the Russian Arctic, and the expansion of the Kearl tar sands operations in northern Alberta, Canada.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
Drilling the Russian Arctic. Expanding tar sands exploitation in Alberta. Exploring for oil in the South China Sea. These are just a few of the capital-intensive fossil fuel extraction projects that are translating into direct bonus payouts to the CEO's at the helm of the largest oil corporations in the world, The Guardian revealed in a report released Monday.
Exxon Mobil, Shell, Chevron, Total, and BP are rewarding CEOs for tapping new markets, despite warnings from scientists that the vast majority of fossil fuels must remain in the ground in order to stave off the worst of the climate crisis.
These payouts are being made amid the dramatic rise in "upstream activities," defined in the report as investment "focused on colossal engineering projects to bring reserves on tap and, to a lesser extent, on exploration."
"Multi-billion-dollar capital projects amount to huge, long-term bets by the big five that exorbitant costs associated with unlocking hydrocarbon reserves in some of the most inaccessible locations on the planet can eventually be recouped and converted into profits," state journalists Simon Bowers and Harry Davies, citing company reports. "Bonuses for chief executives at all five firms are tied to the achievement of delivery milestones in the construction and deployment of such projects."
The Guardian's analysis draws a direct line between fossil fuel extraction projects and CEOs' accrual of massive amounts of personal wealth:
Shell's Ben van Beurden, for example, last year received a pay deal worth $32.2m, including bonuses linked to delivering "a high proportion of flagship projects on time and on budget". These are thought to include four platforms floating 1,000 metres or more above deepwater wells in the Gulf of Mexico, Gulf of Guinea and South China Sea.
Similarly, BP's Bob Dudley was awarded a pay deal worth $15.3m, with bonuses linked to seven "major projects", thought to include Sunrise, a tar sands joint venture in Canada, as well as projects in Angola, Azerbaijan, the Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea.
The boss of Exxon, Rex Tillerson, was paid $33.1m last year including bonus payouts linked to projects including the first well in the Kara Sea, in the Russian Arctic, and the expansion of the Kearl tar sands operations in northern Alberta, Canada.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
Drilling the Russian Arctic. Expanding tar sands exploitation in Alberta. Exploring for oil in the South China Sea. These are just a few of the capital-intensive fossil fuel extraction projects that are translating into direct bonus payouts to the CEO's at the helm of the largest oil corporations in the world, The Guardian revealed in a report released Monday.
Exxon Mobil, Shell, Chevron, Total, and BP are rewarding CEOs for tapping new markets, despite warnings from scientists that the vast majority of fossil fuels must remain in the ground in order to stave off the worst of the climate crisis.
These payouts are being made amid the dramatic rise in "upstream activities," defined in the report as investment "focused on colossal engineering projects to bring reserves on tap and, to a lesser extent, on exploration."
"Multi-billion-dollar capital projects amount to huge, long-term bets by the big five that exorbitant costs associated with unlocking hydrocarbon reserves in some of the most inaccessible locations on the planet can eventually be recouped and converted into profits," state journalists Simon Bowers and Harry Davies, citing company reports. "Bonuses for chief executives at all five firms are tied to the achievement of delivery milestones in the construction and deployment of such projects."
The Guardian's analysis draws a direct line between fossil fuel extraction projects and CEOs' accrual of massive amounts of personal wealth:
Shell's Ben van Beurden, for example, last year received a pay deal worth $32.2m, including bonuses linked to delivering "a high proportion of flagship projects on time and on budget". These are thought to include four platforms floating 1,000 metres or more above deepwater wells in the Gulf of Mexico, Gulf of Guinea and South China Sea.
Similarly, BP's Bob Dudley was awarded a pay deal worth $15.3m, with bonuses linked to seven "major projects", thought to include Sunrise, a tar sands joint venture in Canada, as well as projects in Angola, Azerbaijan, the Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea.
The boss of Exxon, Rex Tillerson, was paid $33.1m last year including bonus payouts linked to projects including the first well in the Kara Sea, in the Russian Arctic, and the expansion of the Kearl tar sands operations in northern Alberta, Canada.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.