Apr 22, 2015
The New York judge who on Tuesday granted a writ of habeas corpus to two chimpanzees being held at Stony Brook University has issued a revised order (pdf) clarifying that she did not mean to give legal personhood to the primates.
Leo and Hercules, who are currently housed at Stony Brook University for biomedical experiments, may still gain freedom from captivity and be transferred to the Save the Chimps sanctuary in Ft. Pierce, Florida, but Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Barbara Jaffe's amended ruling removes the precedent-setting factor of the case.
A hearing is set for May 6, in which a representative of Stony Brook University will have to argue the school's reasons for keeping the chimps. The Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP), which filed the case, will argue that the primates are too intelligent and emotionally complex to be held in captivity. The court will then decide whether to set Leo and Hercules free.
After the amendment was made, the NhRP responded with measured optimism.
"This case is one of a trio of cases that the Nonhuman Rights Project has brought in an attempt to free chimpanzees imprisoned within the State of New York through an 'Article 70-Habeas Corpus' proceeding," the NhRP stated. "These cases are novel and this is the first time that an Order to Show Cause has issued. We are grateful for an opportunity to litigate the issue of the freedom of the chimpanzees, Hercules and Leo, at the ordered May hearing."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The New York judge who on Tuesday granted a writ of habeas corpus to two chimpanzees being held at Stony Brook University has issued a revised order (pdf) clarifying that she did not mean to give legal personhood to the primates.
Leo and Hercules, who are currently housed at Stony Brook University for biomedical experiments, may still gain freedom from captivity and be transferred to the Save the Chimps sanctuary in Ft. Pierce, Florida, but Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Barbara Jaffe's amended ruling removes the precedent-setting factor of the case.
A hearing is set for May 6, in which a representative of Stony Brook University will have to argue the school's reasons for keeping the chimps. The Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP), which filed the case, will argue that the primates are too intelligent and emotionally complex to be held in captivity. The court will then decide whether to set Leo and Hercules free.
After the amendment was made, the NhRP responded with measured optimism.
"This case is one of a trio of cases that the Nonhuman Rights Project has brought in an attempt to free chimpanzees imprisoned within the State of New York through an 'Article 70-Habeas Corpus' proceeding," the NhRP stated. "These cases are novel and this is the first time that an Order to Show Cause has issued. We are grateful for an opportunity to litigate the issue of the freedom of the chimpanzees, Hercules and Leo, at the ordered May hearing."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The New York judge who on Tuesday granted a writ of habeas corpus to two chimpanzees being held at Stony Brook University has issued a revised order (pdf) clarifying that she did not mean to give legal personhood to the primates.
Leo and Hercules, who are currently housed at Stony Brook University for biomedical experiments, may still gain freedom from captivity and be transferred to the Save the Chimps sanctuary in Ft. Pierce, Florida, but Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Barbara Jaffe's amended ruling removes the precedent-setting factor of the case.
A hearing is set for May 6, in which a representative of Stony Brook University will have to argue the school's reasons for keeping the chimps. The Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP), which filed the case, will argue that the primates are too intelligent and emotionally complex to be held in captivity. The court will then decide whether to set Leo and Hercules free.
After the amendment was made, the NhRP responded with measured optimism.
"This case is one of a trio of cases that the Nonhuman Rights Project has brought in an attempt to free chimpanzees imprisoned within the State of New York through an 'Article 70-Habeas Corpus' proceeding," the NhRP stated. "These cases are novel and this is the first time that an Order to Show Cause has issued. We are grateful for an opportunity to litigate the issue of the freedom of the chimpanzees, Hercules and Leo, at the ordered May hearing."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.