SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Docs Reveal Internal Foot Dragging Hampered WHO's Ebola Response
Correspondence obtained by the Associated Press finds agency delayed declaring an emergency for months, despite warnings from staff
Mar 20, 2015
The World Health Organization, which is tasked by the United Nations with directing international responses to epidemics, has been widely criticized for its slow response to the ongoing Ebola crisis in West Africa that has already killed over 10,000 people.
Now, internal documents obtained by the Associated Press reveal that the WHO held off on declaring the outbreak a public health emergency for months, despite warnings from its own employees.
Some experts, including a WHO doctor interviewed by the AP, argue that an earlier alarm could have galvanized a more robust global response and potentially saved lives.
By mid-April, the agency was receiving urgent correspondence from staffers in impacted countries warning that the epidemic was rapidly spreading, but senior officials declined to sound a global alarm. When the WHO held discussions in early June about whether to declare an emergency, a director referred to this option as a "last resort."
AP reporters Maria Cheng and Raphael Satter say the agency cited "worries that declaring such an emergency--akin to an international SOS--could anger the African countries involved, hurt their economies or interfere with the Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca."
Furthermore, in public statements, the WHO repeatedly understated the threat posed by Ebola, directly contradicting mounting warnings from aid groups that said the crisis was growing.
The WHO finally declared a public health emergency on August 8, but by that time Ebola had killed at least 932 people, making it the worst outbreak ever recorded.
The problems did not stop there, and the WHO was not alone in its lagging response.
Just weeks after the emergency declaration, Doctors Without Borders/Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) warned that the overall global response--especially from wealthy nations--was falling disgracefully short.
"Self-protection is occupying the entire focus of states that have the expertise and resources to make a dramatic difference in the affected countries," declared Brice de le Vingne, MSF director of operations, on August 27. "They can do more, so why don't they?"
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
The World Health Organization, which is tasked by the United Nations with directing international responses to epidemics, has been widely criticized for its slow response to the ongoing Ebola crisis in West Africa that has already killed over 10,000 people.
Now, internal documents obtained by the Associated Press reveal that the WHO held off on declaring the outbreak a public health emergency for months, despite warnings from its own employees.
Some experts, including a WHO doctor interviewed by the AP, argue that an earlier alarm could have galvanized a more robust global response and potentially saved lives.
By mid-April, the agency was receiving urgent correspondence from staffers in impacted countries warning that the epidemic was rapidly spreading, but senior officials declined to sound a global alarm. When the WHO held discussions in early June about whether to declare an emergency, a director referred to this option as a "last resort."
AP reporters Maria Cheng and Raphael Satter say the agency cited "worries that declaring such an emergency--akin to an international SOS--could anger the African countries involved, hurt their economies or interfere with the Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca."
Furthermore, in public statements, the WHO repeatedly understated the threat posed by Ebola, directly contradicting mounting warnings from aid groups that said the crisis was growing.
The WHO finally declared a public health emergency on August 8, but by that time Ebola had killed at least 932 people, making it the worst outbreak ever recorded.
The problems did not stop there, and the WHO was not alone in its lagging response.
Just weeks after the emergency declaration, Doctors Without Borders/Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) warned that the overall global response--especially from wealthy nations--was falling disgracefully short.
"Self-protection is occupying the entire focus of states that have the expertise and resources to make a dramatic difference in the affected countries," declared Brice de le Vingne, MSF director of operations, on August 27. "They can do more, so why don't they?"
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
The World Health Organization, which is tasked by the United Nations with directing international responses to epidemics, has been widely criticized for its slow response to the ongoing Ebola crisis in West Africa that has already killed over 10,000 people.
Now, internal documents obtained by the Associated Press reveal that the WHO held off on declaring the outbreak a public health emergency for months, despite warnings from its own employees.
Some experts, including a WHO doctor interviewed by the AP, argue that an earlier alarm could have galvanized a more robust global response and potentially saved lives.
By mid-April, the agency was receiving urgent correspondence from staffers in impacted countries warning that the epidemic was rapidly spreading, but senior officials declined to sound a global alarm. When the WHO held discussions in early June about whether to declare an emergency, a director referred to this option as a "last resort."
AP reporters Maria Cheng and Raphael Satter say the agency cited "worries that declaring such an emergency--akin to an international SOS--could anger the African countries involved, hurt their economies or interfere with the Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca."
Furthermore, in public statements, the WHO repeatedly understated the threat posed by Ebola, directly contradicting mounting warnings from aid groups that said the crisis was growing.
The WHO finally declared a public health emergency on August 8, but by that time Ebola had killed at least 932 people, making it the worst outbreak ever recorded.
The problems did not stop there, and the WHO was not alone in its lagging response.
Just weeks after the emergency declaration, Doctors Without Borders/Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) warned that the overall global response--especially from wealthy nations--was falling disgracefully short.
"Self-protection is occupying the entire focus of states that have the expertise and resources to make a dramatic difference in the affected countries," declared Brice de le Vingne, MSF director of operations, on August 27. "They can do more, so why don't they?"
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy