Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

If you’ve been waiting for the right time to support our work—that time is now.

Our mission is simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

But without the support of our readers, this model does not work and we simply won’t survive. It’s that simple.
We must meet our Mid-Year Campaign goal but we need you now.

Please, support independent journalism today.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

President Obama meeting with Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko on Sept. 18, 2014. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

President Obama meeting with Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko on Sept. 18, 2014. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

On Ukraine, Will Obama Heed Call for Caution?

Ignoring threat of nuclear war, warhawks on both side of the aisle continue to push to send weapons to Ukraine

Lauren McCauley

Despite mounting pressure from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, sources close to the president say that he appears to be—for the time being—standing by his decision to not send arms to Ukraine.

President Obama is concerned that by arming the Ukrainians he would be "playing to Russia's strength," an argument recently made by Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

The New York Times, speaking with people close to the president, reported on Wednesday that "he has told aides and visitors that arming the Ukrainians would encourage the notion that they could actually defeat the far more powerful Russians, and so it would potentially draw a more forceful response from Moscow." Further, Obama wants to allow the shaky cease-fire, which was agreed on in Minsk last month, a chance to take hold.

"Mr. Obama continues to pose questions indicating his doubts," the Times continues, "'O.K., what happens if we send in equipment—do we have to send in trainers?' said one person paraphrasing the discussion on the condition of anonymity. 'What if it ends up in the hands of thugs? What if Putin escalates?'"

Obama's reluctance contrasts the opinions of other lawmakers and officials, who in recent days have continued to push for sending armaments.

A bipartisan group of senators on Tuesday sent a letter to Senate Appropriations Committee chair Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) and ranking member Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) calling for the allocation of $350 million for the U.S. to provide weapons to Ukraine's military.

"We fully support the authorization provided under the Ukraine Freedom Support Act to provide defensive weapons to the Government of Ukraine. Congress can send an important message to Ukraine, the Kremlin, and the world by appropriating the authorized funding in accordance with the law," read the letter, which the Hill reports was signed by 11 Republicans and two Democrats. 

The letter follows another communication sent last week to Obama from House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and a group of top Democrats and Republicans which urged the president to "quickly approve additional efforts to support Ukraine's efforts to defend its sovereign territory, including through the transfer of lethal defense weapons systems to the Ukrainian military."

Also last week, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey told the Senate Armed Services Committee that the U.S. should "absolutely considering" arming Ukraine, a plea that has been echoed by other war hawks including former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.

Meanwhile, NATO allies including German Chancellor Angela Merkel have voiced strong opposition to sending arms.

As investigative reporter Robert Parry continues to warn anyone willing to listen, Russia possess some 8,000 nuclear warheads, roughly matching the U.S. arsenal, while the two countries together have around 1,800 missiles "ready to launch at nearly a moment’s notice."

"Baiting the Russian bear may seem like great fun to the tough-talking politicians in Washington, "Parry wrote last week," but this hostile rhetoric could be taken more seriously in Moscow."

The Obama administration has already committed to sending Ukraine $118 million in nonlethal aid, such as night-vision goggles and counter-mortar radar. On Tuesday, officials told a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that roughly half of that has been delivered. More shipments are expected to be announced as soon as Wednesday, while the administration reportedly is planning to approve another $120 million of similar aid, the Times reports.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.

 

'We WILL Fight Back': Outrage, Resolve as Protests Erupt Against SCOTUS Abortion Ruling

Demonstrators took to the streets Friday to defiantly denounce the Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority after it rescinded a constitutional right for the first time in U.S. history.

Brett Wilkins ·


80+ US Prosecutors Vow Not to Be Part of Criminalizing Abortion Care

"Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice," says a joint statement signed by 84 elected attorneys. "Prosecutors should not be part of that."

Kenny Stancil ·


Progressives Rebuke Dem Leadership as Clyburn Dismisses Death of Roe as 'Anticlimactic'

"The gap between the Democratic leadership, and younger progressives on the question of 'How Bad Is It?' is just enormous."

Julia Conley ·


In 10 Key US Senate Races, Here's How Top Candidates Responded to Roe Ruling

While Republicans unanimously welcomed the Supreme Court's rollback of half a century of reproductive rights, one Democrat said "it's just wrong that my granddaughter will have fewer freedoms than my grandmother did."

Brett Wilkins ·


Sanders Says End Filibuster to Combat 'Outrageous' Supreme Court Assault on Abortion Rights

"If Republicans can end the filibuster to install right-wing judges to overturn Roe v. Wade, Democrats can and must end the filibuster, codify Roe v. Wade, and make abortion legal and safe," said the Vermont senator.

Jake Johnson ·

Common Dreams Logo