

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The UN Security Council will meet Wednesday to discuss Libya as Egypt announces it sees no other option than launching an international intervention to target Islamic extremists there.
On Monday, Egypt launched airstrikes in Libya in retaliation for the killing of 21 Egyptian Christians kidnapped by a Libyan extremist group. "The brutal mass murder of Egyptian nationals in Libya was the first large-scale atrocity claimed by Isis outside its familiar heartlands in Syria and Iraq," the Guardian reported.
Though the strikes were reportedly aimed at IS targets, civilians became casualties as well. The Egyptian military said, "The air strikes hit their [ISIL] targets precisely, and the falcons of our air forces returned safely to their bases." However, NBC News reported that "activists and witnesses in Derna told Libyan television that eight strikes had destroyed homes in the Sheeha neighborhood, killing civilians including three children and two women."
Speaking on France's Europe 1 Radio, Egypt's President Abdel-Fattah el-Sisi said, "I think there is no choice" other than having a UN-backed coalition take military action. He said, "We have abandoned the Libyan people as prisoners of the militias . . . The militias have to give up their arms and must work in a civil context. We have to disarm and prevent arms from falling into the hands of extremists."
For ordinary Libyans, the potential of intervention comes amid years of continuing humanitarian crisis.
As Glenn Greenwald writes at The Intercept, the 2011 U.S.-led intervention in Libya was widely lauded as a successful model, yet the country "has rapidly unraveled in much the way Iraq did following that invasion." Other observers also noted the country's instabilty.
Speaking to Democracy Now!, journalist Sharif Abdel Kouddous said that "just overall dysfunction has really become a way of life in Libya. Libyans are forced to bear the burden of the conflict as it tears away the last vestiges of normalcy."
Kouddous added that the instability "has created a void in which groups like the Islamic State group can flourish."
And Jon Lee Anderson writes in the upcoming issue of The New Yorker, "There is no overstating the chaos of post-Qaddafi Libya."
"What has followed the downfall of a tyrant--a downfall encouraged by NATO air strikes--is the tyranny of a dangerous and pervasive instability," Anderson writes.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The UN Security Council will meet Wednesday to discuss Libya as Egypt announces it sees no other option than launching an international intervention to target Islamic extremists there.
On Monday, Egypt launched airstrikes in Libya in retaliation for the killing of 21 Egyptian Christians kidnapped by a Libyan extremist group. "The brutal mass murder of Egyptian nationals in Libya was the first large-scale atrocity claimed by Isis outside its familiar heartlands in Syria and Iraq," the Guardian reported.
Though the strikes were reportedly aimed at IS targets, civilians became casualties as well. The Egyptian military said, "The air strikes hit their [ISIL] targets precisely, and the falcons of our air forces returned safely to their bases." However, NBC News reported that "activists and witnesses in Derna told Libyan television that eight strikes had destroyed homes in the Sheeha neighborhood, killing civilians including three children and two women."
Speaking on France's Europe 1 Radio, Egypt's President Abdel-Fattah el-Sisi said, "I think there is no choice" other than having a UN-backed coalition take military action. He said, "We have abandoned the Libyan people as prisoners of the militias . . . The militias have to give up their arms and must work in a civil context. We have to disarm and prevent arms from falling into the hands of extremists."
For ordinary Libyans, the potential of intervention comes amid years of continuing humanitarian crisis.
As Glenn Greenwald writes at The Intercept, the 2011 U.S.-led intervention in Libya was widely lauded as a successful model, yet the country "has rapidly unraveled in much the way Iraq did following that invasion." Other observers also noted the country's instabilty.
Speaking to Democracy Now!, journalist Sharif Abdel Kouddous said that "just overall dysfunction has really become a way of life in Libya. Libyans are forced to bear the burden of the conflict as it tears away the last vestiges of normalcy."
Kouddous added that the instability "has created a void in which groups like the Islamic State group can flourish."
And Jon Lee Anderson writes in the upcoming issue of The New Yorker, "There is no overstating the chaos of post-Qaddafi Libya."
"What has followed the downfall of a tyrant--a downfall encouraged by NATO air strikes--is the tyranny of a dangerous and pervasive instability," Anderson writes.
The UN Security Council will meet Wednesday to discuss Libya as Egypt announces it sees no other option than launching an international intervention to target Islamic extremists there.
On Monday, Egypt launched airstrikes in Libya in retaliation for the killing of 21 Egyptian Christians kidnapped by a Libyan extremist group. "The brutal mass murder of Egyptian nationals in Libya was the first large-scale atrocity claimed by Isis outside its familiar heartlands in Syria and Iraq," the Guardian reported.
Though the strikes were reportedly aimed at IS targets, civilians became casualties as well. The Egyptian military said, "The air strikes hit their [ISIL] targets precisely, and the falcons of our air forces returned safely to their bases." However, NBC News reported that "activists and witnesses in Derna told Libyan television that eight strikes had destroyed homes in the Sheeha neighborhood, killing civilians including three children and two women."
Speaking on France's Europe 1 Radio, Egypt's President Abdel-Fattah el-Sisi said, "I think there is no choice" other than having a UN-backed coalition take military action. He said, "We have abandoned the Libyan people as prisoners of the militias . . . The militias have to give up their arms and must work in a civil context. We have to disarm and prevent arms from falling into the hands of extremists."
For ordinary Libyans, the potential of intervention comes amid years of continuing humanitarian crisis.
As Glenn Greenwald writes at The Intercept, the 2011 U.S.-led intervention in Libya was widely lauded as a successful model, yet the country "has rapidly unraveled in much the way Iraq did following that invasion." Other observers also noted the country's instabilty.
Speaking to Democracy Now!, journalist Sharif Abdel Kouddous said that "just overall dysfunction has really become a way of life in Libya. Libyans are forced to bear the burden of the conflict as it tears away the last vestiges of normalcy."
Kouddous added that the instability "has created a void in which groups like the Islamic State group can flourish."
And Jon Lee Anderson writes in the upcoming issue of The New Yorker, "There is no overstating the chaos of post-Qaddafi Libya."
"What has followed the downfall of a tyrant--a downfall encouraged by NATO air strikes--is the tyranny of a dangerous and pervasive instability," Anderson writes.