SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Big Oil Spending Millions to Kill Local Anti-Fracking Measure
Santa Barbara County the site of another David vs. Goliath fight in local initiatives
Oct 22, 2014
Fossil fuel energy companies have spent over $7.6 million to defeat a measure that would ban fracking in California's Santa Barbara County.
Measure P, which was brought forth by the Santa Barbara County Water Guardians, would ban "high-intensity petroleum operations," including fracking, acidizing and steam-injection methods.
Among those donating to the committee against the measure, Californians for Energy Independence, are Chevron, which contributed over $2.5 million, Occidental Petroleum Corporation, which gave $2 million, and Aera Energy, which donated over $2 million, as of October 6.
In contrast, the Yes on Measure P committee states that it has "raised about $300,000 from hundreds of mostly local individuals and volunteers including teachers, farmers, doctors, students, parents and other county residents." Those contributions are not posted by the California Secretary of State at this time.
Yes on P states that the vast industry spending makes the it "the most expensive local measure in the country."
Though the pro-ban group states that the majority of the over 1,000 active wells in the county do not use "high-intensity" extraction techniques, it says that old wells could be reworked to take advantage of such methods; in addition, the area sits on top of the Monterey Shale formation, where fracking or acidizing would be necessary.
Such extraction methods, Yes on P says, take scarce water resources, contribute to water pollution, air pollution, and greenhouse gases, and have been linked to increased seismic activity.
The Santa Barbara-based Community Environment Council, one of the supporters of Yes on P, states that in passing the measure, the county could serve as an example for the nation in how to work towards a clean energy future.
"As the site of the first major oil spill in the United States in 1969 - which galvanized the modern environmental movement - Santa Barbara has a real as well as symbolic role to play in rejecting the most destructive forms of fossil-fuel production, transitioning to clean energy, and creating a blueprint for other communities to follow," the groups states on its website.
"We can't afford to fail," it continues.
"The failure of Measure P in Santa Barbara County would not only threaten Santa Barbara as a biodiversity hotspot and treasured region, it could also set back the climate change and anti-fracking movements statewide, nationally and even globally. The nation's eyes are on us with this vote, as other communities face similar concerns," the group states.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Fossil fuel energy companies have spent over $7.6 million to defeat a measure that would ban fracking in California's Santa Barbara County.
Measure P, which was brought forth by the Santa Barbara County Water Guardians, would ban "high-intensity petroleum operations," including fracking, acidizing and steam-injection methods.
Among those donating to the committee against the measure, Californians for Energy Independence, are Chevron, which contributed over $2.5 million, Occidental Petroleum Corporation, which gave $2 million, and Aera Energy, which donated over $2 million, as of October 6.
In contrast, the Yes on Measure P committee states that it has "raised about $300,000 from hundreds of mostly local individuals and volunteers including teachers, farmers, doctors, students, parents and other county residents." Those contributions are not posted by the California Secretary of State at this time.
Yes on P states that the vast industry spending makes the it "the most expensive local measure in the country."
Though the pro-ban group states that the majority of the over 1,000 active wells in the county do not use "high-intensity" extraction techniques, it says that old wells could be reworked to take advantage of such methods; in addition, the area sits on top of the Monterey Shale formation, where fracking or acidizing would be necessary.
Such extraction methods, Yes on P says, take scarce water resources, contribute to water pollution, air pollution, and greenhouse gases, and have been linked to increased seismic activity.
The Santa Barbara-based Community Environment Council, one of the supporters of Yes on P, states that in passing the measure, the county could serve as an example for the nation in how to work towards a clean energy future.
"As the site of the first major oil spill in the United States in 1969 - which galvanized the modern environmental movement - Santa Barbara has a real as well as symbolic role to play in rejecting the most destructive forms of fossil-fuel production, transitioning to clean energy, and creating a blueprint for other communities to follow," the groups states on its website.
"We can't afford to fail," it continues.
"The failure of Measure P in Santa Barbara County would not only threaten Santa Barbara as a biodiversity hotspot and treasured region, it could also set back the climate change and anti-fracking movements statewide, nationally and even globally. The nation's eyes are on us with this vote, as other communities face similar concerns," the group states.
Fossil fuel energy companies have spent over $7.6 million to defeat a measure that would ban fracking in California's Santa Barbara County.
Measure P, which was brought forth by the Santa Barbara County Water Guardians, would ban "high-intensity petroleum operations," including fracking, acidizing and steam-injection methods.
Among those donating to the committee against the measure, Californians for Energy Independence, are Chevron, which contributed over $2.5 million, Occidental Petroleum Corporation, which gave $2 million, and Aera Energy, which donated over $2 million, as of October 6.
In contrast, the Yes on Measure P committee states that it has "raised about $300,000 from hundreds of mostly local individuals and volunteers including teachers, farmers, doctors, students, parents and other county residents." Those contributions are not posted by the California Secretary of State at this time.
Yes on P states that the vast industry spending makes the it "the most expensive local measure in the country."
Though the pro-ban group states that the majority of the over 1,000 active wells in the county do not use "high-intensity" extraction techniques, it says that old wells could be reworked to take advantage of such methods; in addition, the area sits on top of the Monterey Shale formation, where fracking or acidizing would be necessary.
Such extraction methods, Yes on P says, take scarce water resources, contribute to water pollution, air pollution, and greenhouse gases, and have been linked to increased seismic activity.
The Santa Barbara-based Community Environment Council, one of the supporters of Yes on P, states that in passing the measure, the county could serve as an example for the nation in how to work towards a clean energy future.
"As the site of the first major oil spill in the United States in 1969 - which galvanized the modern environmental movement - Santa Barbara has a real as well as symbolic role to play in rejecting the most destructive forms of fossil-fuel production, transitioning to clean energy, and creating a blueprint for other communities to follow," the groups states on its website.
"We can't afford to fail," it continues.
"The failure of Measure P in Santa Barbara County would not only threaten Santa Barbara as a biodiversity hotspot and treasured region, it could also set back the climate change and anti-fracking movements statewide, nationally and even globally. The nation's eyes are on us with this vote, as other communities face similar concerns," the group states.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.