By Failing to Reduce Carbon Emissions, US Leads Way in Destroying Climate
World is currently on track to burn this century’s IPCC carbon budget within 20 years, says new report
The world's most developed nations, according to a new report released Monday, are not doing nearly enough to meet their promised reductions of carbon emissions aimed at keeping global temperatures from exceeding 2 degrees Celsius this century,
And these nations--including the United States, France, and other leading economies in Europe--are not missing their reduction obligations by a small amount. Rather, according to the Low Carbon Economy Index report--conducted by the UK-based global accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)--these nations are emitting carbon at more than five times what they ought to be if the world is to stave off the worst impacts of global warming and climate change.
While some nations have made gains in reducing their levels of pollution, the United States is among those performing most poorly.
"After a decade of carbon inertia, we are way behind, and now need to decarbonise at more than five times our current rate to avoid 2degC," said PwC's Leo Johnson. "Making up for the inadequacy to date will be technologically harder, financially costlier, and climactically riskier in the future."
And John Grant, director of the sustainability and climate change department at PwC, writes at the Guardian on Monday:
The world is currently on track to burn this century's IPCC carbon budget within 20 years, and a pathway to 4C of global warming by 2100. For many of us, 2034 is within our working lifetime. It's within the timeframe of decisions being made today, on long-term investments, on the location of factories and their supply chains. So businesses are making those decisions faced with uncertainty about climate policy and potential impacts of climate change.
It is clear that the gap between what governments are saying about climate change and what they are doing about it continues to widen. While they talk about two degrees at the climate negotiations, the current trend is for a 4C world.
Nearly 200 nations have signed onto a non-binding agreement to lower emissions enough so that temperatures stay beneath the 2 degree threshold, but repeated studies and analyses have shown that continued inaction by governments and increased fossil fuel consumption worldwide is pushing the trends in the exact opposite direction.
As Sandy Dechert, writing at Clean Technica, writes:
With the Copenhagen agreement five years ago, almost 200 countries agreed at United Nations climate talks to adopt "the scientific view that the increase in global temperature should be below 2 degrees Celsius" (3.6 degrees F) above pre-industrial times, while growing world economies, to combat climate change. This would curtail increases in heat waves, floods, storms, and sea level rise due to natural and human-induced climate change.
At about 0.85 degrees C, we citizens of the world are now almost halfway there. The latest studies indicate that we may be approaching the serious risk of runaway climate change. In this report, PwC says that (1) we have missed the global carbon intensity (greenhouse gas emissions per $GDP) reduction target every year, and (2) we need to decrease energy-related carbon emissions by more than five times the rate we are currently achieving.
The Low Carbon Economy Index report reveals major disconnects between the global climate negotiations goal of a 2degC rise limit, current national pledges (which add up to a 3degC rise), and our current trajectory, which is actually on course for 4degC. (Disruption, released last night as 350.org's leadup film to its climate march in two weeks, sees us on track for 6degC.) Current rates of carbon intensity mean that we'll reach the total amount of carbon the world can "safely" emit this century within 20 years.
As indicated by Dechert, the report from PwC--used widely by industry investors and calculated alongside projections of economic growth--comes just weeks before the next round of international climate talks are scheduled to place at the United Nations in New York City on September 23. It is in the context of runaway emissions and continued inaction at the government policy level which has led global climate justice advocates to demand that "business as usual" when it comes to the fossil fuel industry must now come to an end.
As part of their effort to radically transform the nature of the debate and the policies that are on the table, the organizers behind the "People's Climate March & Mobilization" are increasingly asserting the fact that the physics of planetary warming and climate change will no longer wait for incremental reforms. Instead of promises and agreements, they declare, the people of the world must rise up, wrest control from those who would continue to watch the world burn, and take action.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The world's most developed nations, according to a new report released Monday, are not doing nearly enough to meet their promised reductions of carbon emissions aimed at keeping global temperatures from exceeding 2 degrees Celsius this century,
And these nations--including the United States, France, and other leading economies in Europe--are not missing their reduction obligations by a small amount. Rather, according to the Low Carbon Economy Index report--conducted by the UK-based global accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)--these nations are emitting carbon at more than five times what they ought to be if the world is to stave off the worst impacts of global warming and climate change.
While some nations have made gains in reducing their levels of pollution, the United States is among those performing most poorly.
"After a decade of carbon inertia, we are way behind, and now need to decarbonise at more than five times our current rate to avoid 2degC," said PwC's Leo Johnson. "Making up for the inadequacy to date will be technologically harder, financially costlier, and climactically riskier in the future."
And John Grant, director of the sustainability and climate change department at PwC, writes at the Guardian on Monday:
The world is currently on track to burn this century's IPCC carbon budget within 20 years, and a pathway to 4C of global warming by 2100. For many of us, 2034 is within our working lifetime. It's within the timeframe of decisions being made today, on long-term investments, on the location of factories and their supply chains. So businesses are making those decisions faced with uncertainty about climate policy and potential impacts of climate change.
It is clear that the gap between what governments are saying about climate change and what they are doing about it continues to widen. While they talk about two degrees at the climate negotiations, the current trend is for a 4C world.
Nearly 200 nations have signed onto a non-binding agreement to lower emissions enough so that temperatures stay beneath the 2 degree threshold, but repeated studies and analyses have shown that continued inaction by governments and increased fossil fuel consumption worldwide is pushing the trends in the exact opposite direction.
As Sandy Dechert, writing at Clean Technica, writes:
With the Copenhagen agreement five years ago, almost 200 countries agreed at United Nations climate talks to adopt "the scientific view that the increase in global temperature should be below 2 degrees Celsius" (3.6 degrees F) above pre-industrial times, while growing world economies, to combat climate change. This would curtail increases in heat waves, floods, storms, and sea level rise due to natural and human-induced climate change.
At about 0.85 degrees C, we citizens of the world are now almost halfway there. The latest studies indicate that we may be approaching the serious risk of runaway climate change. In this report, PwC says that (1) we have missed the global carbon intensity (greenhouse gas emissions per $GDP) reduction target every year, and (2) we need to decrease energy-related carbon emissions by more than five times the rate we are currently achieving.
The Low Carbon Economy Index report reveals major disconnects between the global climate negotiations goal of a 2degC rise limit, current national pledges (which add up to a 3degC rise), and our current trajectory, which is actually on course for 4degC. (Disruption, released last night as 350.org's leadup film to its climate march in two weeks, sees us on track for 6degC.) Current rates of carbon intensity mean that we'll reach the total amount of carbon the world can "safely" emit this century within 20 years.
As indicated by Dechert, the report from PwC--used widely by industry investors and calculated alongside projections of economic growth--comes just weeks before the next round of international climate talks are scheduled to place at the United Nations in New York City on September 23. It is in the context of runaway emissions and continued inaction at the government policy level which has led global climate justice advocates to demand that "business as usual" when it comes to the fossil fuel industry must now come to an end.
As part of their effort to radically transform the nature of the debate and the policies that are on the table, the organizers behind the "People's Climate March & Mobilization" are increasingly asserting the fact that the physics of planetary warming and climate change will no longer wait for incremental reforms. Instead of promises and agreements, they declare, the people of the world must rise up, wrest control from those who would continue to watch the world burn, and take action.
The world's most developed nations, according to a new report released Monday, are not doing nearly enough to meet their promised reductions of carbon emissions aimed at keeping global temperatures from exceeding 2 degrees Celsius this century,
And these nations--including the United States, France, and other leading economies in Europe--are not missing their reduction obligations by a small amount. Rather, according to the Low Carbon Economy Index report--conducted by the UK-based global accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)--these nations are emitting carbon at more than five times what they ought to be if the world is to stave off the worst impacts of global warming and climate change.
While some nations have made gains in reducing their levels of pollution, the United States is among those performing most poorly.
"After a decade of carbon inertia, we are way behind, and now need to decarbonise at more than five times our current rate to avoid 2degC," said PwC's Leo Johnson. "Making up for the inadequacy to date will be technologically harder, financially costlier, and climactically riskier in the future."
And John Grant, director of the sustainability and climate change department at PwC, writes at the Guardian on Monday:
The world is currently on track to burn this century's IPCC carbon budget within 20 years, and a pathway to 4C of global warming by 2100. For many of us, 2034 is within our working lifetime. It's within the timeframe of decisions being made today, on long-term investments, on the location of factories and their supply chains. So businesses are making those decisions faced with uncertainty about climate policy and potential impacts of climate change.
It is clear that the gap between what governments are saying about climate change and what they are doing about it continues to widen. While they talk about two degrees at the climate negotiations, the current trend is for a 4C world.
Nearly 200 nations have signed onto a non-binding agreement to lower emissions enough so that temperatures stay beneath the 2 degree threshold, but repeated studies and analyses have shown that continued inaction by governments and increased fossil fuel consumption worldwide is pushing the trends in the exact opposite direction.
As Sandy Dechert, writing at Clean Technica, writes:
With the Copenhagen agreement five years ago, almost 200 countries agreed at United Nations climate talks to adopt "the scientific view that the increase in global temperature should be below 2 degrees Celsius" (3.6 degrees F) above pre-industrial times, while growing world economies, to combat climate change. This would curtail increases in heat waves, floods, storms, and sea level rise due to natural and human-induced climate change.
At about 0.85 degrees C, we citizens of the world are now almost halfway there. The latest studies indicate that we may be approaching the serious risk of runaway climate change. In this report, PwC says that (1) we have missed the global carbon intensity (greenhouse gas emissions per $GDP) reduction target every year, and (2) we need to decrease energy-related carbon emissions by more than five times the rate we are currently achieving.
The Low Carbon Economy Index report reveals major disconnects between the global climate negotiations goal of a 2degC rise limit, current national pledges (which add up to a 3degC rise), and our current trajectory, which is actually on course for 4degC. (Disruption, released last night as 350.org's leadup film to its climate march in two weeks, sees us on track for 6degC.) Current rates of carbon intensity mean that we'll reach the total amount of carbon the world can "safely" emit this century within 20 years.
As indicated by Dechert, the report from PwC--used widely by industry investors and calculated alongside projections of economic growth--comes just weeks before the next round of international climate talks are scheduled to place at the United Nations in New York City on September 23. It is in the context of runaway emissions and continued inaction at the government policy level which has led global climate justice advocates to demand that "business as usual" when it comes to the fossil fuel industry must now come to an end.
As part of their effort to radically transform the nature of the debate and the policies that are on the table, the organizers behind the "People's Climate March & Mobilization" are increasingly asserting the fact that the physics of planetary warming and climate change will no longer wait for incremental reforms. Instead of promises and agreements, they declare, the people of the world must rise up, wrest control from those who would continue to watch the world burn, and take action.