WaPo: Governments Exploit Cell Phone Technology to Track Users Worldwide
Investigation shows "the burgeoning, multibillion-dollar surveillance industry makes advanced spying technology available worldwide."
A "burgeoning, multibillion-dollar surveillance industry" is making technology available to governments around the world that lets them "track the movements of almost anybody who carries a cell phone, whether they are blocks away or on another continent," a Washington Post investigation shows.
On Sunday, the Post reported that these surveillance systems, which vendors are marketing to government agencies overseas, exploit "an essential fact of all cellular networks: They must keep detailed, up-to-the-minute records on the locations of their customers to deliver calls and other services to them."
Users of the technology are able to type a phone number into a computer system, which in turn employs information from cellular carriers like AT&T or Verizon--such as what cell tower the target is currently using--to pinpoint a person's location "to within a few blocks in an urban area or a few miles in a rural one."
Such spying practices are nothing new in the U.S. and other technologically developed countries, national tech reporter Craig Timberg notes in his report.
The world's most powerful intelligence services, such as the National Security Agency and Britain's GCHQ, long have used cellphone data to track targets around the globe. But experts say these new systems allow less technically advanced governments to track people in any nation--including the United States--with relative ease and precision.
The technology could also be employed by hackers, criminal gangs, or nations under sanctions, Timberg writes.
Private surveillance vendors benefit from the fact that such location-targeting pings are virtually impossible to detect--or curtail--given that the global cellular network serves billions of phones and devices.
According to the Post, "Telecommunications experts say networks have become so complex that implementing new security measures to defend against these surveillance systems could cost billions of dollars and hurt the functioning of basic services, such as routing calls, texts and Internet to customers."
An FCC spokesperson told the Post such systems "could fall into the category of technologies" that will be further looked into by an internal task force.
The London-based advocacy group Privacy International says the global surveillance industry is estimated at $5 billion a year.
Hanni Fakhoury, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, will be speaking this fall about how domestic law enforcement in the U.S. is using similar technology--and how criminal defense attorneys can uncover and challenge such surveillance.
"The Post article highlights just how invasive and revealing cell phone tracking has become," Fakhoury tells Common Dreams. "While it's right to question how foreign governments are using the technology we should also be paying close attention to which law enforcement agencies in the U.S. are purchasing and using similar equipment and the legal process by which they do so. There's been a lot of obfuscation on the part of U.S. agencies on that point and we them to be more forthright with the public about how and when they use such technologies."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
A "burgeoning, multibillion-dollar surveillance industry" is making technology available to governments around the world that lets them "track the movements of almost anybody who carries a cell phone, whether they are blocks away or on another continent," a Washington Post investigation shows.
On Sunday, the Post reported that these surveillance systems, which vendors are marketing to government agencies overseas, exploit "an essential fact of all cellular networks: They must keep detailed, up-to-the-minute records on the locations of their customers to deliver calls and other services to them."
Users of the technology are able to type a phone number into a computer system, which in turn employs information from cellular carriers like AT&T or Verizon--such as what cell tower the target is currently using--to pinpoint a person's location "to within a few blocks in an urban area or a few miles in a rural one."
Such spying practices are nothing new in the U.S. and other technologically developed countries, national tech reporter Craig Timberg notes in his report.
The world's most powerful intelligence services, such as the National Security Agency and Britain's GCHQ, long have used cellphone data to track targets around the globe. But experts say these new systems allow less technically advanced governments to track people in any nation--including the United States--with relative ease and precision.
The technology could also be employed by hackers, criminal gangs, or nations under sanctions, Timberg writes.
Private surveillance vendors benefit from the fact that such location-targeting pings are virtually impossible to detect--or curtail--given that the global cellular network serves billions of phones and devices.
According to the Post, "Telecommunications experts say networks have become so complex that implementing new security measures to defend against these surveillance systems could cost billions of dollars and hurt the functioning of basic services, such as routing calls, texts and Internet to customers."
An FCC spokesperson told the Post such systems "could fall into the category of technologies" that will be further looked into by an internal task force.
The London-based advocacy group Privacy International says the global surveillance industry is estimated at $5 billion a year.
Hanni Fakhoury, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, will be speaking this fall about how domestic law enforcement in the U.S. is using similar technology--and how criminal defense attorneys can uncover and challenge such surveillance.
"The Post article highlights just how invasive and revealing cell phone tracking has become," Fakhoury tells Common Dreams. "While it's right to question how foreign governments are using the technology we should also be paying close attention to which law enforcement agencies in the U.S. are purchasing and using similar equipment and the legal process by which they do so. There's been a lot of obfuscation on the part of U.S. agencies on that point and we them to be more forthright with the public about how and when they use such technologies."
A "burgeoning, multibillion-dollar surveillance industry" is making technology available to governments around the world that lets them "track the movements of almost anybody who carries a cell phone, whether they are blocks away or on another continent," a Washington Post investigation shows.
On Sunday, the Post reported that these surveillance systems, which vendors are marketing to government agencies overseas, exploit "an essential fact of all cellular networks: They must keep detailed, up-to-the-minute records on the locations of their customers to deliver calls and other services to them."
Users of the technology are able to type a phone number into a computer system, which in turn employs information from cellular carriers like AT&T or Verizon--such as what cell tower the target is currently using--to pinpoint a person's location "to within a few blocks in an urban area or a few miles in a rural one."
Such spying practices are nothing new in the U.S. and other technologically developed countries, national tech reporter Craig Timberg notes in his report.
The world's most powerful intelligence services, such as the National Security Agency and Britain's GCHQ, long have used cellphone data to track targets around the globe. But experts say these new systems allow less technically advanced governments to track people in any nation--including the United States--with relative ease and precision.
The technology could also be employed by hackers, criminal gangs, or nations under sanctions, Timberg writes.
Private surveillance vendors benefit from the fact that such location-targeting pings are virtually impossible to detect--or curtail--given that the global cellular network serves billions of phones and devices.
According to the Post, "Telecommunications experts say networks have become so complex that implementing new security measures to defend against these surveillance systems could cost billions of dollars and hurt the functioning of basic services, such as routing calls, texts and Internet to customers."
An FCC spokesperson told the Post such systems "could fall into the category of technologies" that will be further looked into by an internal task force.
The London-based advocacy group Privacy International says the global surveillance industry is estimated at $5 billion a year.
Hanni Fakhoury, staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, will be speaking this fall about how domestic law enforcement in the U.S. is using similar technology--and how criminal defense attorneys can uncover and challenge such surveillance.
"The Post article highlights just how invasive and revealing cell phone tracking has become," Fakhoury tells Common Dreams. "While it's right to question how foreign governments are using the technology we should also be paying close attention to which law enforcement agencies in the U.S. are purchasing and using similar equipment and the legal process by which they do so. There's been a lot of obfuscation on the part of U.S. agencies on that point and we them to be more forthright with the public about how and when they use such technologies."