(Photo: acidpolly/Flickr/Creative Commons)
Jul 16, 2014
A Swedish court ruled on Wednesday to uphold an arrest warrant against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange related to investigation in that country surrounding allegations of sexual assault.
Judge Lena Egelin said the warrant will remain in place, but Assange's lawyers plan to appeal the ruling.
Swedish reporter Per Nyberg tweeted:
\u201c#Assange's defence team says they will appeal to a higher court. "This has to come to an end" Kristinn Hrafnsson from @wikileaks told me\u201d— Per Bergfors Nyberg (@Per Bergfors Nyberg) 1405527944
Assange, who is Australian, has been living in the Embassy of Ecuador in London since 2012. Ecuador granted Assange asylum, accepting his argument that if sent to Sweden he could face possible extradition and political persecution by the United States.
Although Assange has not been charged with any crime, he is wanted by police for questioning over allegations of sexual assault of two women in 2010. According to the Associated Press, Swedish prosecutors "declined to allow the possibility of questioning him in London."
Assange, who has denied the claims and repeatedly made offers to answer questions concerning the investigation, has said he fears being extradited to Sweden would lead to his being sent to the U.S. where he is the subject of an ongoing Justice Department investigation and a possible sealed federal indictment. White House officials condemned Wikileaks for its massive release of secret government files and have called Assange an "enemy of the state" for his journalistic work including exposing war crimes in Iraq and high level diplomatic cables from U.S. embassies around the world.
Last month, a number of international human rights groups, press freedom advocates and civil society organizations said that Assange's legal treatment by the Swedish government is politically motivated and in direct violation of his human rights. In the lead-up to today's ruling, the organizations called on the United Nations and the Human Rights Commission in Geneva to intervene on Assange's behalf, calling him a "political prisoner."
Camilla Murray, chief administrator at the court, toldAgence France-Presse that even if the arrest warrant had been cancelled, the case against Assange would not have been dropped.
Scotland Yard says if Assange steps outside the Ecuadorian embassy, he will be arrested.
The Guardian is providing live coverage of the ruling here. Swedish Pirate Party leader Rick Falkvinge also live-blogged the hearing from the Stockholm District Court.
_____________________
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A Swedish court ruled on Wednesday to uphold an arrest warrant against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange related to investigation in that country surrounding allegations of sexual assault.
Judge Lena Egelin said the warrant will remain in place, but Assange's lawyers plan to appeal the ruling.
Swedish reporter Per Nyberg tweeted:
\u201c#Assange's defence team says they will appeal to a higher court. "This has to come to an end" Kristinn Hrafnsson from @wikileaks told me\u201d— Per Bergfors Nyberg (@Per Bergfors Nyberg) 1405527944
Assange, who is Australian, has been living in the Embassy of Ecuador in London since 2012. Ecuador granted Assange asylum, accepting his argument that if sent to Sweden he could face possible extradition and political persecution by the United States.
Although Assange has not been charged with any crime, he is wanted by police for questioning over allegations of sexual assault of two women in 2010. According to the Associated Press, Swedish prosecutors "declined to allow the possibility of questioning him in London."
Assange, who has denied the claims and repeatedly made offers to answer questions concerning the investigation, has said he fears being extradited to Sweden would lead to his being sent to the U.S. where he is the subject of an ongoing Justice Department investigation and a possible sealed federal indictment. White House officials condemned Wikileaks for its massive release of secret government files and have called Assange an "enemy of the state" for his journalistic work including exposing war crimes in Iraq and high level diplomatic cables from U.S. embassies around the world.
Last month, a number of international human rights groups, press freedom advocates and civil society organizations said that Assange's legal treatment by the Swedish government is politically motivated and in direct violation of his human rights. In the lead-up to today's ruling, the organizations called on the United Nations and the Human Rights Commission in Geneva to intervene on Assange's behalf, calling him a "political prisoner."
Camilla Murray, chief administrator at the court, toldAgence France-Presse that even if the arrest warrant had been cancelled, the case against Assange would not have been dropped.
Scotland Yard says if Assange steps outside the Ecuadorian embassy, he will be arrested.
The Guardian is providing live coverage of the ruling here. Swedish Pirate Party leader Rick Falkvinge also live-blogged the hearing from the Stockholm District Court.
_____________________
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A Swedish court ruled on Wednesday to uphold an arrest warrant against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange related to investigation in that country surrounding allegations of sexual assault.
Judge Lena Egelin said the warrant will remain in place, but Assange's lawyers plan to appeal the ruling.
Swedish reporter Per Nyberg tweeted:
\u201c#Assange's defence team says they will appeal to a higher court. "This has to come to an end" Kristinn Hrafnsson from @wikileaks told me\u201d— Per Bergfors Nyberg (@Per Bergfors Nyberg) 1405527944
Assange, who is Australian, has been living in the Embassy of Ecuador in London since 2012. Ecuador granted Assange asylum, accepting his argument that if sent to Sweden he could face possible extradition and political persecution by the United States.
Although Assange has not been charged with any crime, he is wanted by police for questioning over allegations of sexual assault of two women in 2010. According to the Associated Press, Swedish prosecutors "declined to allow the possibility of questioning him in London."
Assange, who has denied the claims and repeatedly made offers to answer questions concerning the investigation, has said he fears being extradited to Sweden would lead to his being sent to the U.S. where he is the subject of an ongoing Justice Department investigation and a possible sealed federal indictment. White House officials condemned Wikileaks for its massive release of secret government files and have called Assange an "enemy of the state" for his journalistic work including exposing war crimes in Iraq and high level diplomatic cables from U.S. embassies around the world.
Last month, a number of international human rights groups, press freedom advocates and civil society organizations said that Assange's legal treatment by the Swedish government is politically motivated and in direct violation of his human rights. In the lead-up to today's ruling, the organizations called on the United Nations and the Human Rights Commission in Geneva to intervene on Assange's behalf, calling him a "political prisoner."
Camilla Murray, chief administrator at the court, toldAgence France-Presse that even if the arrest warrant had been cancelled, the case against Assange would not have been dropped.
Scotland Yard says if Assange steps outside the Ecuadorian embassy, he will be arrested.
The Guardian is providing live coverage of the ruling here. Swedish Pirate Party leader Rick Falkvinge also live-blogged the hearing from the Stockholm District Court.
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.