SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
(Photo: Daniel Foster/Flickr/Creative Commons)
'Buzzword List' Reveals What State Officials Can't Say About Fracking
Former state employees told to ignore drilling-related health issues
Jul 02, 2014
Former employees of the Pennsylvania Department of Health were ordered by supervisors to ignore complaints about fracking-related health issues and follow a host of other rules to keep the dangers of drilling under wraps -- even at the expense of people's health.
NPR State Impact spoke with two retirees from the department who said they were instructed never to return phone calls from residents with health problems stemming from natural gas development, like skin rashes, nausea, and nosebleeds. Employees were also given a laundry list of "buzzwords" and phrases to refrain from using when talking with the public -- particularly those that explicitly related to the issue, like "fracking," "gas," and "soil contamination."
Other terms covered health and environmental issues, such as "hair falling out," "water contamination," and "cancer cluster."
The department confirmed the "buzzword list" on Wednesday, stating it was meant to be used as a guideline. As of 2012, the Bureau of Health Planning and Assessment was still passing the list around to staff members and asking them to send health complaints to the Bureau of Epidemiology, which was meant to follow up on the issues separately.
Marshall P. Deasy, a 20-year veteran of the department, said that drilling was the only issue he could remember being censored by supervisors.
Many areas in Pennsylvania cover a portion of the Marcellus Shale, a large reserve of natural gas, making the state a lucrative place for the energy industry. Fracking, a controversial practice that involves using high-pressure drilling and chemicals to extract gas from deep underground, has been shown to release toxins into the environment and is linked to health issues like birth defects and cancer.
Lobbyists from the gas industry, as well as officials from the Center for Disease Control (CDC), have said that the few scientific studies conducted on fracking are not conclusive enough to confirm whether the practice is harmful.
_____________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Former employees of the Pennsylvania Department of Health were ordered by supervisors to ignore complaints about fracking-related health issues and follow a host of other rules to keep the dangers of drilling under wraps -- even at the expense of people's health.
NPR State Impact spoke with two retirees from the department who said they were instructed never to return phone calls from residents with health problems stemming from natural gas development, like skin rashes, nausea, and nosebleeds. Employees were also given a laundry list of "buzzwords" and phrases to refrain from using when talking with the public -- particularly those that explicitly related to the issue, like "fracking," "gas," and "soil contamination."
Other terms covered health and environmental issues, such as "hair falling out," "water contamination," and "cancer cluster."
The department confirmed the "buzzword list" on Wednesday, stating it was meant to be used as a guideline. As of 2012, the Bureau of Health Planning and Assessment was still passing the list around to staff members and asking them to send health complaints to the Bureau of Epidemiology, which was meant to follow up on the issues separately.
Marshall P. Deasy, a 20-year veteran of the department, said that drilling was the only issue he could remember being censored by supervisors.
Many areas in Pennsylvania cover a portion of the Marcellus Shale, a large reserve of natural gas, making the state a lucrative place for the energy industry. Fracking, a controversial practice that involves using high-pressure drilling and chemicals to extract gas from deep underground, has been shown to release toxins into the environment and is linked to health issues like birth defects and cancer.
Lobbyists from the gas industry, as well as officials from the Center for Disease Control (CDC), have said that the few scientific studies conducted on fracking are not conclusive enough to confirm whether the practice is harmful.
_____________________
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Former employees of the Pennsylvania Department of Health were ordered by supervisors to ignore complaints about fracking-related health issues and follow a host of other rules to keep the dangers of drilling under wraps -- even at the expense of people's health.
NPR State Impact spoke with two retirees from the department who said they were instructed never to return phone calls from residents with health problems stemming from natural gas development, like skin rashes, nausea, and nosebleeds. Employees were also given a laundry list of "buzzwords" and phrases to refrain from using when talking with the public -- particularly those that explicitly related to the issue, like "fracking," "gas," and "soil contamination."
Other terms covered health and environmental issues, such as "hair falling out," "water contamination," and "cancer cluster."
The department confirmed the "buzzword list" on Wednesday, stating it was meant to be used as a guideline. As of 2012, the Bureau of Health Planning and Assessment was still passing the list around to staff members and asking them to send health complaints to the Bureau of Epidemiology, which was meant to follow up on the issues separately.
Marshall P. Deasy, a 20-year veteran of the department, said that drilling was the only issue he could remember being censored by supervisors.
Many areas in Pennsylvania cover a portion of the Marcellus Shale, a large reserve of natural gas, making the state a lucrative place for the energy industry. Fracking, a controversial practice that involves using high-pressure drilling and chemicals to extract gas from deep underground, has been shown to release toxins into the environment and is linked to health issues like birth defects and cancer.
Lobbyists from the gas industry, as well as officials from the Center for Disease Control (CDC), have said that the few scientific studies conducted on fracking are not conclusive enough to confirm whether the practice is harmful.
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.