Verizon Lobbyists Say Net Neutrality Hurts People With Disabilities
Company claims internet "fast lanes" would better support special-needs services
Verizon introduced a new argument against net neutrality this week, claiming that a lack of "fast lane" services could hurt blind, deaf, and disabled internet users.
According to Mother Jones, Verizon lobbyists on the Hill claimed that without fast lane internet, disabled Americans could be faced with substandard service as web traffic increases and risk missing out on vital technology in emergency situations.
The argument comes as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) considers a proposal that would end net neutrality, a current regulation that ensures equal treatment of websites by internet service providers (ISPs). If approved, the plan would allow ISPs like Verizon to charge companies for internet service, potentially giving a major advantage to web giants who could afford to pay premium charges for faster-loading websites, videos, and other content.
Reactions from both public and private sectors to the fast lane proposal have been divisive, with big tech companies like Google publicly standing against the plan, while broadband providers like Verizon and AT&T have acted in support of it.
AT&T senior executive Jim Cicconi described the plan as an attempt to "foster an investment environment... so that all consumers can have the fastest Internet lanes in the world," while almost 150 tech companies, including Google, Amazon, and Netflix, signed a petition urging the FCC to vote against it, calling paid fast lanes "a threat to the internet."
In previous years, former Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg cited disabled access in a similar argument against net neutrality, claiming that it can prevent companies from quickly transmitting medical data by not allowing them to prioritize those services over spam.
But Verizon's most recent claim that net neutrality could have negative consequences for disabled users hasn't been corroborated by the FCC. Commission chairman Tom Wheeler said that even if the fast lane plan is not approved, companies providing special services to disabled users would be able to pay ISPs for speedier service.
Wheeler, a former cable company lobbyist, is a proponent of fast lane services.
_____________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Verizon introduced a new argument against net neutrality this week, claiming that a lack of "fast lane" services could hurt blind, deaf, and disabled internet users.
According to Mother Jones, Verizon lobbyists on the Hill claimed that without fast lane internet, disabled Americans could be faced with substandard service as web traffic increases and risk missing out on vital technology in emergency situations.
The argument comes as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) considers a proposal that would end net neutrality, a current regulation that ensures equal treatment of websites by internet service providers (ISPs). If approved, the plan would allow ISPs like Verizon to charge companies for internet service, potentially giving a major advantage to web giants who could afford to pay premium charges for faster-loading websites, videos, and other content.
Reactions from both public and private sectors to the fast lane proposal have been divisive, with big tech companies like Google publicly standing against the plan, while broadband providers like Verizon and AT&T have acted in support of it.
AT&T senior executive Jim Cicconi described the plan as an attempt to "foster an investment environment... so that all consumers can have the fastest Internet lanes in the world," while almost 150 tech companies, including Google, Amazon, and Netflix, signed a petition urging the FCC to vote against it, calling paid fast lanes "a threat to the internet."
In previous years, former Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg cited disabled access in a similar argument against net neutrality, claiming that it can prevent companies from quickly transmitting medical data by not allowing them to prioritize those services over spam.
But Verizon's most recent claim that net neutrality could have negative consequences for disabled users hasn't been corroborated by the FCC. Commission chairman Tom Wheeler said that even if the fast lane plan is not approved, companies providing special services to disabled users would be able to pay ISPs for speedier service.
Wheeler, a former cable company lobbyist, is a proponent of fast lane services.
_____________________
Verizon introduced a new argument against net neutrality this week, claiming that a lack of "fast lane" services could hurt blind, deaf, and disabled internet users.
According to Mother Jones, Verizon lobbyists on the Hill claimed that without fast lane internet, disabled Americans could be faced with substandard service as web traffic increases and risk missing out on vital technology in emergency situations.
The argument comes as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) considers a proposal that would end net neutrality, a current regulation that ensures equal treatment of websites by internet service providers (ISPs). If approved, the plan would allow ISPs like Verizon to charge companies for internet service, potentially giving a major advantage to web giants who could afford to pay premium charges for faster-loading websites, videos, and other content.
Reactions from both public and private sectors to the fast lane proposal have been divisive, with big tech companies like Google publicly standing against the plan, while broadband providers like Verizon and AT&T have acted in support of it.
AT&T senior executive Jim Cicconi described the plan as an attempt to "foster an investment environment... so that all consumers can have the fastest Internet lanes in the world," while almost 150 tech companies, including Google, Amazon, and Netflix, signed a petition urging the FCC to vote against it, calling paid fast lanes "a threat to the internet."
In previous years, former Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg cited disabled access in a similar argument against net neutrality, claiming that it can prevent companies from quickly transmitting medical data by not allowing them to prioritize those services over spam.
But Verizon's most recent claim that net neutrality could have negative consequences for disabled users hasn't been corroborated by the FCC. Commission chairman Tom Wheeler said that even if the fast lane plan is not approved, companies providing special services to disabled users would be able to pay ISPs for speedier service.
Wheeler, a former cable company lobbyist, is a proponent of fast lane services.
_____________________