

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A swelling grassroots coalition is hoping they can stop their county from becoming another landscape "scarred" by fracking.
The Santa Barbara County Water Guardians gathered roughly 16,000 signatures -- 3,000 more than required -- to put a measure to ban the controversial extraction technique on the November ballot.
Their proposal goes Tuesday before the Board of Supervisors, who can put the measure on the Nov. ballot, or can choose to vote the initiative directly into law.
"This is the result of hundreds of volunteers working tirelessly to qualify this initiative for the ballot," stated Corrie Ellis of Water Guardians. "This represents more than 3,000 hours of volunteer effort in just three weeks, which shows the strength of community support for this initiative."
In addition to banning fracking, their proposal seeks to ban two other "extreme extraction techniques" -- acidizing and steam injection.
"Santa Barbara County is under threat of a massive increase in oil production made possible through dangerous and polluting 'enhanced' extraction techniques," Water Guardians states on their website.
"Oil companies have identified thousands upon thousands of potential drill locations across our region -- from Santa Maria to Carpinteria."
"We must protect our County by placing a ban on these extreme extraction techniques," the group writes.
Among those in favor of the fracking ban is local farmer Tom Shepherd, who said, "The oil companies are pushing hard to create a short-term fracking bubble that will leave our landscapes scarred and our resources damaged."
"If we want our children and grandchildren to thrive in this region, we must focus on sustainable practices that preserve our clean air and clean water. A ban on fracking in this region can't come soon enough, and that is why I am a proud proponent of this initiative," Shepherd stated.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A swelling grassroots coalition is hoping they can stop their county from becoming another landscape "scarred" by fracking.
The Santa Barbara County Water Guardians gathered roughly 16,000 signatures -- 3,000 more than required -- to put a measure to ban the controversial extraction technique on the November ballot.
Their proposal goes Tuesday before the Board of Supervisors, who can put the measure on the Nov. ballot, or can choose to vote the initiative directly into law.
"This is the result of hundreds of volunteers working tirelessly to qualify this initiative for the ballot," stated Corrie Ellis of Water Guardians. "This represents more than 3,000 hours of volunteer effort in just three weeks, which shows the strength of community support for this initiative."
In addition to banning fracking, their proposal seeks to ban two other "extreme extraction techniques" -- acidizing and steam injection.
"Santa Barbara County is under threat of a massive increase in oil production made possible through dangerous and polluting 'enhanced' extraction techniques," Water Guardians states on their website.
"Oil companies have identified thousands upon thousands of potential drill locations across our region -- from Santa Maria to Carpinteria."
"We must protect our County by placing a ban on these extreme extraction techniques," the group writes.
Among those in favor of the fracking ban is local farmer Tom Shepherd, who said, "The oil companies are pushing hard to create a short-term fracking bubble that will leave our landscapes scarred and our resources damaged."
"If we want our children and grandchildren to thrive in this region, we must focus on sustainable practices that preserve our clean air and clean water. A ban on fracking in this region can't come soon enough, and that is why I am a proud proponent of this initiative," Shepherd stated.
A swelling grassroots coalition is hoping they can stop their county from becoming another landscape "scarred" by fracking.
The Santa Barbara County Water Guardians gathered roughly 16,000 signatures -- 3,000 more than required -- to put a measure to ban the controversial extraction technique on the November ballot.
Their proposal goes Tuesday before the Board of Supervisors, who can put the measure on the Nov. ballot, or can choose to vote the initiative directly into law.
"This is the result of hundreds of volunteers working tirelessly to qualify this initiative for the ballot," stated Corrie Ellis of Water Guardians. "This represents more than 3,000 hours of volunteer effort in just three weeks, which shows the strength of community support for this initiative."
In addition to banning fracking, their proposal seeks to ban two other "extreme extraction techniques" -- acidizing and steam injection.
"Santa Barbara County is under threat of a massive increase in oil production made possible through dangerous and polluting 'enhanced' extraction techniques," Water Guardians states on their website.
"Oil companies have identified thousands upon thousands of potential drill locations across our region -- from Santa Maria to Carpinteria."
"We must protect our County by placing a ban on these extreme extraction techniques," the group writes.
Among those in favor of the fracking ban is local farmer Tom Shepherd, who said, "The oil companies are pushing hard to create a short-term fracking bubble that will leave our landscapes scarred and our resources damaged."
"If we want our children and grandchildren to thrive in this region, we must focus on sustainable practices that preserve our clean air and clean water. A ban on fracking in this region can't come soon enough, and that is why I am a proud proponent of this initiative," Shepherd stated.