Victory for Millions as High Court Rules Against Cross-State Pollution
"The EPA safeguards follow the simple principle that giant utility companies shouldn't be allowed to dump their dirty emissions onto residents of downwind states"
In what is being hailed as a major victory for public health, the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday affirmed the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate cross-state air emissions from polluting factories and power plants.
In a 6-2 decision, the Court upheld the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, commonly known as the Transport Rule, which required 28 eastern states to reduce power-plant emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), which often form smog and worsens air quality across state lines.
"Air pollution is transient, heedless of state boundaries," wrote Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who delivered the opinion for the Court. "Left unregulated, the emitting or upwind State reaps the benefits of the economic activity causing the pollution without bearing all the costs."
After being adopted by the EPA in 2011, power companies and several states sued to block the rule from taking effect and in 2012 a federal court ruled to invalidate the rule.
"The EPA safeguards follow the simple principle that giant utility companies shouldn't be allowed to dump their dirty emissions onto residents of downwind states," said John Walke, director of the Clean Air Program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, in a statement following the ruling. "The Supreme Court wisely upheld this common-sense approach."
Walke added that these "long-overdue protections" will save "tens of billions of dollars a year in health costs" and defend the health and safety of millions who live downwind from polluting power plants.
"For too long, these communities have shouldered an unfair burden on their health and well-being without the ability to protect themselves and their families from dangerous pollution," added Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club.
_____________________
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
In what is being hailed as a major victory for public health, the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday affirmed the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate cross-state air emissions from polluting factories and power plants.
In a 6-2 decision, the Court upheld the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, commonly known as the Transport Rule, which required 28 eastern states to reduce power-plant emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), which often form smog and worsens air quality across state lines.
"Air pollution is transient, heedless of state boundaries," wrote Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who delivered the opinion for the Court. "Left unregulated, the emitting or upwind State reaps the benefits of the economic activity causing the pollution without bearing all the costs."
After being adopted by the EPA in 2011, power companies and several states sued to block the rule from taking effect and in 2012 a federal court ruled to invalidate the rule.
"The EPA safeguards follow the simple principle that giant utility companies shouldn't be allowed to dump their dirty emissions onto residents of downwind states," said John Walke, director of the Clean Air Program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, in a statement following the ruling. "The Supreme Court wisely upheld this common-sense approach."
Walke added that these "long-overdue protections" will save "tens of billions of dollars a year in health costs" and defend the health and safety of millions who live downwind from polluting power plants.
"For too long, these communities have shouldered an unfair burden on their health and well-being without the ability to protect themselves and their families from dangerous pollution," added Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club.
_____________________
In what is being hailed as a major victory for public health, the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday affirmed the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate cross-state air emissions from polluting factories and power plants.
In a 6-2 decision, the Court upheld the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, commonly known as the Transport Rule, which required 28 eastern states to reduce power-plant emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), which often form smog and worsens air quality across state lines.
"Air pollution is transient, heedless of state boundaries," wrote Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who delivered the opinion for the Court. "Left unregulated, the emitting or upwind State reaps the benefits of the economic activity causing the pollution without bearing all the costs."
After being adopted by the EPA in 2011, power companies and several states sued to block the rule from taking effect and in 2012 a federal court ruled to invalidate the rule.
"The EPA safeguards follow the simple principle that giant utility companies shouldn't be allowed to dump their dirty emissions onto residents of downwind states," said John Walke, director of the Clean Air Program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, in a statement following the ruling. "The Supreme Court wisely upheld this common-sense approach."
Walke added that these "long-overdue protections" will save "tens of billions of dollars a year in health costs" and defend the health and safety of millions who live downwind from polluting power plants.
"For too long, these communities have shouldered an unfair burden on their health and well-being without the ability to protect themselves and their families from dangerous pollution," added Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club.
_____________________