Howard Dean Takes Hawkish Stance Against Diplomacy with Iran
Speaking on behalf of dissident group of Iranians, former (and possibly future) presidential candidate says, "We need to stand up to the mullahs."
"We need to stand up to the mullahs. These are not people we ought to be negotiating with."
That's what former Democratic Vermont governor and presidential candidate Howard Dean said during a speaking engagement in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, just one day after the State of the Union in which President Obama championed ongoing diplomatic efforts between the U.S. and Iran.
The policy briefing at which Dean made the comments was hosted by the Iranian-American Community of Arkansas, a member of the Organization of Iranian-American Communities, an MEK advocacy group. The MEK, which stands for Mujahideen-e Khalq, is a well known Iranian dissident group that until 2012 was listed on the U.S. State Department's list of terrorist organizations. Its removal from that list followed an extensive and high-priced lobbying campaign which sponsored numerous former high-level U.S. officials from both major parties, including Dean.
Opposition to Dean's position was reflected by many on Twitter, including this personal message from Nassim Kadoo who works as a campaigner on Iran issues for Amnesty International:
Asked by a journalist if he received payment for his remarks on Wednesday, Dean dodged the question:
Whereas many Democrats have backed away from a bill moving through Congress that threatens to sabotage the fragile talks between Iran and P5+1 nations, Dean--who has indicated (through actions if not words) a possible presidential run in 2016--said the diplomatic deal should not be completed without strict protections for 3,000 MEK members still living in exile in neighboring Iraq.
According to Gray's reporting at Buzzfeed:
Dean said that no agreement should be signed until the administration agrees to take in 3,000 MEK refugees from Camp Ashraf, where they had been living in exile and have been attacked by the Iraqi government. MEK's U.S. supporters have accused the U.S. government of forcing the dissidents forced out of Camp Ashraf to live in inhumane conditions in Camp Liberty, a former U.S. military base.
"We ought to sign no agreement until those 3000 people are safe," Dean said.
Asked after his speech whether he was still being paid by the MEK, as he has acknowledged in the past, Dean said "I don't answer questions like that. I'm interested in human rights, reporters are always interested in that. I don't play the game, sorry."
"I said I was for it, but as a condition of signing the nuclear agreement, we ought to make sure these 3,000 people are safe and they ought to be out of Iraq," Dean said of his stance on negotiating with Iran.
"That's your story, my story is what's going on in here," Dean said when pressed on the question of compensation.
Though regarded broadly as "liberal" by many, Dean's position on Iran betrayed his progressive credentials as conservative Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin was among the few applauding his stance against diplomacy. Interpreting Dean's anti-diplomacy position as a stand for Israeli interests, Rubin called the episode "a pleasant throwback to an earlier era in which Democratic support for the Jewish state was a given."
__________________________________________
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
"We need to stand up to the mullahs. These are not people we ought to be negotiating with."
That's what former Democratic Vermont governor and presidential candidate Howard Dean said during a speaking engagement in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, just one day after the State of the Union in which President Obama championed ongoing diplomatic efforts between the U.S. and Iran.
The policy briefing at which Dean made the comments was hosted by the Iranian-American Community of Arkansas, a member of the Organization of Iranian-American Communities, an MEK advocacy group. The MEK, which stands for Mujahideen-e Khalq, is a well known Iranian dissident group that until 2012 was listed on the U.S. State Department's list of terrorist organizations. Its removal from that list followed an extensive and high-priced lobbying campaign which sponsored numerous former high-level U.S. officials from both major parties, including Dean.
Opposition to Dean's position was reflected by many on Twitter, including this personal message from Nassim Kadoo who works as a campaigner on Iran issues for Amnesty International:
Asked by a journalist if he received payment for his remarks on Wednesday, Dean dodged the question:
Whereas many Democrats have backed away from a bill moving through Congress that threatens to sabotage the fragile talks between Iran and P5+1 nations, Dean--who has indicated (through actions if not words) a possible presidential run in 2016--said the diplomatic deal should not be completed without strict protections for 3,000 MEK members still living in exile in neighboring Iraq.
According to Gray's reporting at Buzzfeed:
Dean said that no agreement should be signed until the administration agrees to take in 3,000 MEK refugees from Camp Ashraf, where they had been living in exile and have been attacked by the Iraqi government. MEK's U.S. supporters have accused the U.S. government of forcing the dissidents forced out of Camp Ashraf to live in inhumane conditions in Camp Liberty, a former U.S. military base.
"We ought to sign no agreement until those 3000 people are safe," Dean said.
Asked after his speech whether he was still being paid by the MEK, as he has acknowledged in the past, Dean said "I don't answer questions like that. I'm interested in human rights, reporters are always interested in that. I don't play the game, sorry."
"I said I was for it, but as a condition of signing the nuclear agreement, we ought to make sure these 3,000 people are safe and they ought to be out of Iraq," Dean said of his stance on negotiating with Iran.
"That's your story, my story is what's going on in here," Dean said when pressed on the question of compensation.
Though regarded broadly as "liberal" by many, Dean's position on Iran betrayed his progressive credentials as conservative Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin was among the few applauding his stance against diplomacy. Interpreting Dean's anti-diplomacy position as a stand for Israeli interests, Rubin called the episode "a pleasant throwback to an earlier era in which Democratic support for the Jewish state was a given."
__________________________________________
"We need to stand up to the mullahs. These are not people we ought to be negotiating with."
That's what former Democratic Vermont governor and presidential candidate Howard Dean said during a speaking engagement in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, just one day after the State of the Union in which President Obama championed ongoing diplomatic efforts between the U.S. and Iran.
The policy briefing at which Dean made the comments was hosted by the Iranian-American Community of Arkansas, a member of the Organization of Iranian-American Communities, an MEK advocacy group. The MEK, which stands for Mujahideen-e Khalq, is a well known Iranian dissident group that until 2012 was listed on the U.S. State Department's list of terrorist organizations. Its removal from that list followed an extensive and high-priced lobbying campaign which sponsored numerous former high-level U.S. officials from both major parties, including Dean.
Opposition to Dean's position was reflected by many on Twitter, including this personal message from Nassim Kadoo who works as a campaigner on Iran issues for Amnesty International:
Asked by a journalist if he received payment for his remarks on Wednesday, Dean dodged the question:
Whereas many Democrats have backed away from a bill moving through Congress that threatens to sabotage the fragile talks between Iran and P5+1 nations, Dean--who has indicated (through actions if not words) a possible presidential run in 2016--said the diplomatic deal should not be completed without strict protections for 3,000 MEK members still living in exile in neighboring Iraq.
According to Gray's reporting at Buzzfeed:
Dean said that no agreement should be signed until the administration agrees to take in 3,000 MEK refugees from Camp Ashraf, where they had been living in exile and have been attacked by the Iraqi government. MEK's U.S. supporters have accused the U.S. government of forcing the dissidents forced out of Camp Ashraf to live in inhumane conditions in Camp Liberty, a former U.S. military base.
"We ought to sign no agreement until those 3000 people are safe," Dean said.
Asked after his speech whether he was still being paid by the MEK, as he has acknowledged in the past, Dean said "I don't answer questions like that. I'm interested in human rights, reporters are always interested in that. I don't play the game, sorry."
"I said I was for it, but as a condition of signing the nuclear agreement, we ought to make sure these 3,000 people are safe and they ought to be out of Iraq," Dean said of his stance on negotiating with Iran.
"That's your story, my story is what's going on in here," Dean said when pressed on the question of compensation.
Though regarded broadly as "liberal" by many, Dean's position on Iran betrayed his progressive credentials as conservative Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin was among the few applauding his stance against diplomacy. Interpreting Dean's anti-diplomacy position as a stand for Israeli interests, Rubin called the episode "a pleasant throwback to an earlier era in which Democratic support for the Jewish state was a given."
__________________________________________