SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
US Slams Afghan Decision to Not Indefinitely Hold Bagram Prisoners as 'Step Backward in Rule of Law'
"Foreign forces do not have the right to condemn the decision of the judicial authorities of an independent and sovereign country."
Jan 27, 2014
U.S. military forces on Monday slammed Afghanistan's decision to release from the notorious Bagram prison 37 prisoners for whom there is "no incriminating evidence" as a "major step backward in... the rule of law."
The 37 are among a group of 88 men detained without trial at "the other Guantanamo" whom Afghanistan has slated for release but that the U.S. insists are dangerous and linked to violent acts.
The head of the Afghan Review Board (ARB) previously denied the U.S. assessment that the 88 men were dangerous threats. "In many cases, detainees were wrongly linked to certain incidents they were not involved in," said ARB head Abdul Shakor Dadras. Investigations led by the office of Afghan President Hamid Karzai found evidence against just 16 of the men.
"We cannot allow innocent Afghan citizens to be kept in detention for months and years without a trial, for no reason at all," said Aimal Faizi, Karzai's spokesman. "We know that unfortunately this has been happening at Bagram, but it is illegal and a violation of Afghan sovereignty."
A statement released Monday by United States Forces-Afghanistan condemned the decision to release the men, saying they are "dangerous insurgents who have Afghan blood on their hands" and "legitimate threats to security and for whom there is strong evidence or investigative leads supporting prosecution or further investigation."
USFOR-A's statement specifies: "Of the 88 detainees under dispute, 40 percent have participated in direct attacks wounding or killing 57 Afghan citizens and security force members and 30 percent participated in direct attacks wounding or killing 60 U.S. or coalition force members."
"This extra-judicial release of detainees is a major step backward in further developing the rule of law in Afghanistan," the statement continued.
In response, Karzai's office said, "Foreign forces do not have the right to condemn the decision of the judicial authorities of an independent and sovereign country."
"This is acting like an occupying force, not an ally or partner," spokesman Faizi said.
Speaking at a news conference Saturday, Karzai called Bagram "a place where innocent people are tortured and insulted and made [into] dangerous criminals."
The U.S. reportedly handed control over the prison to Afghanistan in March 2013, yet the U.S. still exerts a powerful role at the prison.
Contributing to tensions between the two countries is the bilateral security agreement the U.S. continues to push Afghanistan to sign, which would continue the occupation for years to come, as well as ongoing U.S.-led attacks that have left civilian casualties.
________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
U.S. military forces on Monday slammed Afghanistan's decision to release from the notorious Bagram prison 37 prisoners for whom there is "no incriminating evidence" as a "major step backward in... the rule of law."
The 37 are among a group of 88 men detained without trial at "the other Guantanamo" whom Afghanistan has slated for release but that the U.S. insists are dangerous and linked to violent acts.
The head of the Afghan Review Board (ARB) previously denied the U.S. assessment that the 88 men were dangerous threats. "In many cases, detainees were wrongly linked to certain incidents they were not involved in," said ARB head Abdul Shakor Dadras. Investigations led by the office of Afghan President Hamid Karzai found evidence against just 16 of the men.
"We cannot allow innocent Afghan citizens to be kept in detention for months and years without a trial, for no reason at all," said Aimal Faizi, Karzai's spokesman. "We know that unfortunately this has been happening at Bagram, but it is illegal and a violation of Afghan sovereignty."
A statement released Monday by United States Forces-Afghanistan condemned the decision to release the men, saying they are "dangerous insurgents who have Afghan blood on their hands" and "legitimate threats to security and for whom there is strong evidence or investigative leads supporting prosecution or further investigation."
USFOR-A's statement specifies: "Of the 88 detainees under dispute, 40 percent have participated in direct attacks wounding or killing 57 Afghan citizens and security force members and 30 percent participated in direct attacks wounding or killing 60 U.S. or coalition force members."
"This extra-judicial release of detainees is a major step backward in further developing the rule of law in Afghanistan," the statement continued.
In response, Karzai's office said, "Foreign forces do not have the right to condemn the decision of the judicial authorities of an independent and sovereign country."
"This is acting like an occupying force, not an ally or partner," spokesman Faizi said.
Speaking at a news conference Saturday, Karzai called Bagram "a place where innocent people are tortured and insulted and made [into] dangerous criminals."
The U.S. reportedly handed control over the prison to Afghanistan in March 2013, yet the U.S. still exerts a powerful role at the prison.
Contributing to tensions between the two countries is the bilateral security agreement the U.S. continues to push Afghanistan to sign, which would continue the occupation for years to come, as well as ongoing U.S.-led attacks that have left civilian casualties.
________________
U.S. military forces on Monday slammed Afghanistan's decision to release from the notorious Bagram prison 37 prisoners for whom there is "no incriminating evidence" as a "major step backward in... the rule of law."
The 37 are among a group of 88 men detained without trial at "the other Guantanamo" whom Afghanistan has slated for release but that the U.S. insists are dangerous and linked to violent acts.
The head of the Afghan Review Board (ARB) previously denied the U.S. assessment that the 88 men were dangerous threats. "In many cases, detainees were wrongly linked to certain incidents they were not involved in," said ARB head Abdul Shakor Dadras. Investigations led by the office of Afghan President Hamid Karzai found evidence against just 16 of the men.
"We cannot allow innocent Afghan citizens to be kept in detention for months and years without a trial, for no reason at all," said Aimal Faizi, Karzai's spokesman. "We know that unfortunately this has been happening at Bagram, but it is illegal and a violation of Afghan sovereignty."
A statement released Monday by United States Forces-Afghanistan condemned the decision to release the men, saying they are "dangerous insurgents who have Afghan blood on their hands" and "legitimate threats to security and for whom there is strong evidence or investigative leads supporting prosecution or further investigation."
USFOR-A's statement specifies: "Of the 88 detainees under dispute, 40 percent have participated in direct attacks wounding or killing 57 Afghan citizens and security force members and 30 percent participated in direct attacks wounding or killing 60 U.S. or coalition force members."
"This extra-judicial release of detainees is a major step backward in further developing the rule of law in Afghanistan," the statement continued.
In response, Karzai's office said, "Foreign forces do not have the right to condemn the decision of the judicial authorities of an independent and sovereign country."
"This is acting like an occupying force, not an ally or partner," spokesman Faizi said.
Speaking at a news conference Saturday, Karzai called Bagram "a place where innocent people are tortured and insulted and made [into] dangerous criminals."
The U.S. reportedly handed control over the prison to Afghanistan in March 2013, yet the U.S. still exerts a powerful role at the prison.
Contributing to tensions between the two countries is the bilateral security agreement the U.S. continues to push Afghanistan to sign, which would continue the occupation for years to come, as well as ongoing U.S.-led attacks that have left civilian casualties.
________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.