Federal Court Sides With Telecom, Deals Blow to Open Internet
'Game-changing' ruling may mean 'rules protecting Internet users from corporate abuse will disappear.'
In a decision that may "serve as a sorry memorial to the corporate abrogation of free speech," a U.S. appeals court on Tuesday struck down the Federal Communications Commission's rules on "net neutrality."
Net neutrality means that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) must treat all content the same. Internet freedom group Free Press explains that with net neutrality, ISPs "may not discriminate between different kinds of online content and apps. It guarantees a level playing field for all websites and Internet technologies."
Reuters reports that during oral argument in the lawsuit brought by Verizon Communications Inc,
Verizon's lawyer said the regulations violated the company's right to free speech and stripped control of what its networks transmit and how.
Ahead of the ruling Josh Levy of Free Press warned that "If Verizon gets its way, the FCC's rules protecting Internet users from corporate abuse will disappear."
Tuesday's ruling siding with Verizon "is a game-changer," business and technology site Gigaom reports,
because it upsets the FCC's current practice of requiring broadband internet providers to act akin to "common carriers." In plain English, this means that they have had to behave in a similar way to phone companies and not give special preference to one type of call (or traffic) over another, even though the FCC's authority to regulate the broadband providers was not clear cut.
Net neutrality advocates are calling Tuesday's ruling "disappointing," and are warning that big telecommunications companies will be able to turn what was a move towards an open Internet into "something that looks like cable TV."
The ruling "is poised to end the free, open, and uncensored Internet that we have come to rely on," former FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, special adviser to advocacy group Common Cause's Media and Democracy Initiative, said in a statement.
Craig Aaron, President and CEO of Free Press, issued a statement saying that "ruling means that Internet users will be pitted against the biggest phone and cable companies--and in the absence of any oversight, these companies can now block and discriminate against their customers' communications at will."
"The compromised Open Internet Order struck down today left much to be desired, but it was a step toward maintaining Internet users' freedom to go where they wanted, when they wanted, and communicate freely online. Now, just as Verizon promised it would in court, the biggest broadband providers will race to turn the open and vibrant Web into something that looks like cable TV. They'll establish fast lanes for the few giant companies that can afford to pay exorbitant tolls and reserve the slow lanes for everyone else," Aaron added.
"Without prompt corrective action by the Commission to reclassify broadband, this awful ruling will serve as a sorry memorial to the corporate abrogation of free speech," Copps added.
The FCC may appeal the ruling.
______________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a decision that may "serve as a sorry memorial to the corporate abrogation of free speech," a U.S. appeals court on Tuesday struck down the Federal Communications Commission's rules on "net neutrality."
Net neutrality means that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) must treat all content the same. Internet freedom group Free Press explains that with net neutrality, ISPs "may not discriminate between different kinds of online content and apps. It guarantees a level playing field for all websites and Internet technologies."
Reuters reports that during oral argument in the lawsuit brought by Verizon Communications Inc,
Verizon's lawyer said the regulations violated the company's right to free speech and stripped control of what its networks transmit and how.
Ahead of the ruling Josh Levy of Free Press warned that "If Verizon gets its way, the FCC's rules protecting Internet users from corporate abuse will disappear."
Tuesday's ruling siding with Verizon "is a game-changer," business and technology site Gigaom reports,
because it upsets the FCC's current practice of requiring broadband internet providers to act akin to "common carriers." In plain English, this means that they have had to behave in a similar way to phone companies and not give special preference to one type of call (or traffic) over another, even though the FCC's authority to regulate the broadband providers was not clear cut.
Net neutrality advocates are calling Tuesday's ruling "disappointing," and are warning that big telecommunications companies will be able to turn what was a move towards an open Internet into "something that looks like cable TV."
The ruling "is poised to end the free, open, and uncensored Internet that we have come to rely on," former FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, special adviser to advocacy group Common Cause's Media and Democracy Initiative, said in a statement.
Craig Aaron, President and CEO of Free Press, issued a statement saying that "ruling means that Internet users will be pitted against the biggest phone and cable companies--and in the absence of any oversight, these companies can now block and discriminate against their customers' communications at will."
"The compromised Open Internet Order struck down today left much to be desired, but it was a step toward maintaining Internet users' freedom to go where they wanted, when they wanted, and communicate freely online. Now, just as Verizon promised it would in court, the biggest broadband providers will race to turn the open and vibrant Web into something that looks like cable TV. They'll establish fast lanes for the few giant companies that can afford to pay exorbitant tolls and reserve the slow lanes for everyone else," Aaron added.
"Without prompt corrective action by the Commission to reclassify broadband, this awful ruling will serve as a sorry memorial to the corporate abrogation of free speech," Copps added.
The FCC may appeal the ruling.
______________
In a decision that may "serve as a sorry memorial to the corporate abrogation of free speech," a U.S. appeals court on Tuesday struck down the Federal Communications Commission's rules on "net neutrality."
Net neutrality means that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) must treat all content the same. Internet freedom group Free Press explains that with net neutrality, ISPs "may not discriminate between different kinds of online content and apps. It guarantees a level playing field for all websites and Internet technologies."
Reuters reports that during oral argument in the lawsuit brought by Verizon Communications Inc,
Verizon's lawyer said the regulations violated the company's right to free speech and stripped control of what its networks transmit and how.
Ahead of the ruling Josh Levy of Free Press warned that "If Verizon gets its way, the FCC's rules protecting Internet users from corporate abuse will disappear."
Tuesday's ruling siding with Verizon "is a game-changer," business and technology site Gigaom reports,
because it upsets the FCC's current practice of requiring broadband internet providers to act akin to "common carriers." In plain English, this means that they have had to behave in a similar way to phone companies and not give special preference to one type of call (or traffic) over another, even though the FCC's authority to regulate the broadband providers was not clear cut.
Net neutrality advocates are calling Tuesday's ruling "disappointing," and are warning that big telecommunications companies will be able to turn what was a move towards an open Internet into "something that looks like cable TV."
The ruling "is poised to end the free, open, and uncensored Internet that we have come to rely on," former FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, special adviser to advocacy group Common Cause's Media and Democracy Initiative, said in a statement.
Craig Aaron, President and CEO of Free Press, issued a statement saying that "ruling means that Internet users will be pitted against the biggest phone and cable companies--and in the absence of any oversight, these companies can now block and discriminate against their customers' communications at will."
"The compromised Open Internet Order struck down today left much to be desired, but it was a step toward maintaining Internet users' freedom to go where they wanted, when they wanted, and communicate freely online. Now, just as Verizon promised it would in court, the biggest broadband providers will race to turn the open and vibrant Web into something that looks like cable TV. They'll establish fast lanes for the few giant companies that can afford to pay exorbitant tolls and reserve the slow lanes for everyone else," Aaron added.
"Without prompt corrective action by the Commission to reclassify broadband, this awful ruling will serve as a sorry memorial to the corporate abrogation of free speech," Copps added.
The FCC may appeal the ruling.
______________