SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Though the outcome of the vote was not a surprise, with the budget issue now heading to the Senate, the events on Capitol Hill over the budget further expose the "unprecedented" hostage-taking tactics of a Republican Party that has made economic denialism and political obstructionism its guiding principles since the current economic crisis began in late 2007 and which it has maintained throughout the Obama presidency.
"Forget the GOP's attempt to shut down the government over the Affordable Care Act. Who is going to explain to the American people how profoundly misguided, and even immoral, the Republicans' entire economic agenda has become?" -Richard Eskow, Campaign for America's Future
And even as many perceive a "civil war" within the Republican Party over how to deal with budget issues or battle their Democratic rivals, nothing in that narrative betrays the degree to which the GOP continues to march in lock-step when it comes to pushing austerity economic policies that insulate society's richest while pushing draconian cuts to programs and services that help workers, the elderly, the young, and the sick.
Calling it a "victory for America" and a "victory for common sense," Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) emerged after Friday's vote to celebrate the House budget resolution. He was greeted with cheers from his caucus members.
Critics and commentators, however, say the Republican obsession with defunding Obamacare (today's vote was their 42nd attempt to do so) and an expected repeat of the political battle over raising "the debt ceiling" (which could happen within a matter of weeks) are parts of a single ploy by the GOP to overcome their minority status in Washington by sabotaging the government's ability to accomplish almost anything.
As economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman writes:
...at the moment, it seems highly likely that the Republican Party will refuse to fund the government, forcing a shutdown at the beginning of next month, unless President Obama dismantles the health reform that is the signature achievement of his presidency. Republican leaders realize that this is a bad idea, but, until recently, their notion of preaching moderation was to urge party radicals not to hold America hostage over the federal budget so they could wait a few weeks and hold it hostage over the debt ceiling instead. Now they've given up even on that delaying tactic. The latest news is that John Boehner, the speaker of the House, has abandoned his efforts to craft a face-saving climbdown on the budget, which means that we're all set for shutdown, possibly followed by debt crisis.
And though many progressives may criticize Obamacare on their own terms--with many citing the blatant giveaway to private insurers embodied in the law and the failure of Democrats to embrace the idea of a single-payer, Medicare-for-all solution to the healthcare crisis--most also recognize that the legislation will, in fact, deliver positive improvements to vulnerable segments of the population, such as expanding the Medicaid program and limiting some of the worst abuses of the private insurers.
And Eugene Robinson, writing in the Washington Post, argues that even if the law is seriously flawed, "it would be wrong to let a bunch of extremist ideologues hold the country hostage in this manner."
"If Republicans want to repeal the reforms," Robinson continued, "they should win the Senate and the presidency. If not, they're welcome to pout and sulk all they want -- but not to use extortion to get their way."
But the problem is certainly bigger than Obamacare, say others.
For Dave Johnson and Richard Eskow, both from the Campaign for America's Future, the larger budget war in Congress--in which the fight over Obamacare and the debt ceiling are battles--simply exposes just how radical and extreme the Republican Party has become in recent years.
"Forget the debt ceiling for a moment, if you can," wrote Eskow just ahead of Friday's vote. "Forget the GOP's attempt to shut down the government over the Affordable Care Act. Who is going to explain to the American people how profoundly misguided, and even immoral, the Republicans' entire economic agenda has become?"
Johnson says that a look at the budget that the House Republicans passed this morning expresses much more about the current GOP agenda than their well-documented hatred for Obama's healthcare law:
The budget in this resolution would be devastating to the economy, especially on top of the cuts that have already hurt the economy and crippled the recovery. A government shutdown would also be devastating to the economy. But even the threat itself hurts the economy, as people and companies pull back and hold off as they wait to see what happens. Past budget fights have proven this - bringing increases in unemployment and reductions in economic growth.
On top of this, Republicans are cutting $40 billion from the SNAP program. So on one hand, they propagandize that the "Obama economy" is hurting people, and then they cut assistance to the people who are hurting, claiming they don't really need it.
Probably at least 47 percent of Americans would be seriously hurt by either - but we already know how Republicans feel about 47 percent of Americans, don't we?
And Eskow adds:
If the GOP's Continuing Resolution is adopted, more cuts will follow: Head Start and the heating-assistance program will suffer further cuts. Education funds for low-income children and the disabled will be slashed. Not that the Republicans are entirely ungenerous: Their plan increases spending for defense by $20 billion, most of which will wind up in the pockets of wealthy defense contractors.
That's the cruelty in the Republican economic plan. Then there's the stupidity. The Congressional Budget Office has already estimated that sequestration cuts will cost the economy 900,000 jobs and shrink our national economy by 0.7 percent.
And what economist Dean Baker takes from a Congressional Budget Office report this week is that the austerity drive Republicans are calling for is exactly the wrong medicine that the ailing economy demands. The U.S. has as "a tax problem, not a spending problem" Baker concluded, explaining how the CBO report predicts a decline in healthcare costs in the coming years under the new law, while specifying that The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (in which Republicans negotiated to make permanent most of the Bush tax cuts) was the main cause for much of the projected fall in budget revenue.
Additionally, according to Johnson, if Republicans think their proposed austerity cuts are "necessary because of government deficits and debt," they clearly didn't see or ignored a "report released this week by the National Priorities Project [showing] that the country is handing more than $1 trillion per year to the already-wealthy."
But if Baker is correct and spending is not the problem, says Johnson, what the U.S. economy needs is "investment in infrastructure and education so our economy can thrive in the future, and we need stimulus now to get people working. If you want to worry about deficit and debt, then tax cuts are the problem."
Astride all this, however, continues to be what some describe as a "civil war" within the GOP. In this argument, what are described as "more moderate" members--specifically represented by Republicans in the Senate--are in a pitched internal battle of wills over political strategy, if not ideology, with what Krugman describes as the "Frankenstein-like monster" the GOP themselves created, otherwise known as the Tea Party.
Whether or not the narrative of this internal tension inside the GOP is accurate or not, what does seem clear to most observers is that the level of obstruction now in Washington has brought the legislative process to an almost complete halt.
Though some lawmakers might ultimately pay the price for their behavior at the hands of an increasingly frustrated public, in the meantime it will continue to be the American economy and the population at large made to suffer as the madness of the Republican Party looks to outshine all other performances in Washington over the coming days, weeks, and months.
____________________________________________________
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Though the outcome of the vote was not a surprise, with the budget issue now heading to the Senate, the events on Capitol Hill over the budget further expose the "unprecedented" hostage-taking tactics of a Republican Party that has made economic denialism and political obstructionism its guiding principles since the current economic crisis began in late 2007 and which it has maintained throughout the Obama presidency.
"Forget the GOP's attempt to shut down the government over the Affordable Care Act. Who is going to explain to the American people how profoundly misguided, and even immoral, the Republicans' entire economic agenda has become?" -Richard Eskow, Campaign for America's Future
And even as many perceive a "civil war" within the Republican Party over how to deal with budget issues or battle their Democratic rivals, nothing in that narrative betrays the degree to which the GOP continues to march in lock-step when it comes to pushing austerity economic policies that insulate society's richest while pushing draconian cuts to programs and services that help workers, the elderly, the young, and the sick.
Calling it a "victory for America" and a "victory for common sense," Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) emerged after Friday's vote to celebrate the House budget resolution. He was greeted with cheers from his caucus members.
Critics and commentators, however, say the Republican obsession with defunding Obamacare (today's vote was their 42nd attempt to do so) and an expected repeat of the political battle over raising "the debt ceiling" (which could happen within a matter of weeks) are parts of a single ploy by the GOP to overcome their minority status in Washington by sabotaging the government's ability to accomplish almost anything.
As economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman writes:
...at the moment, it seems highly likely that the Republican Party will refuse to fund the government, forcing a shutdown at the beginning of next month, unless President Obama dismantles the health reform that is the signature achievement of his presidency. Republican leaders realize that this is a bad idea, but, until recently, their notion of preaching moderation was to urge party radicals not to hold America hostage over the federal budget so they could wait a few weeks and hold it hostage over the debt ceiling instead. Now they've given up even on that delaying tactic. The latest news is that John Boehner, the speaker of the House, has abandoned his efforts to craft a face-saving climbdown on the budget, which means that we're all set for shutdown, possibly followed by debt crisis.
And though many progressives may criticize Obamacare on their own terms--with many citing the blatant giveaway to private insurers embodied in the law and the failure of Democrats to embrace the idea of a single-payer, Medicare-for-all solution to the healthcare crisis--most also recognize that the legislation will, in fact, deliver positive improvements to vulnerable segments of the population, such as expanding the Medicaid program and limiting some of the worst abuses of the private insurers.
And Eugene Robinson, writing in the Washington Post, argues that even if the law is seriously flawed, "it would be wrong to let a bunch of extremist ideologues hold the country hostage in this manner."
"If Republicans want to repeal the reforms," Robinson continued, "they should win the Senate and the presidency. If not, they're welcome to pout and sulk all they want -- but not to use extortion to get their way."
But the problem is certainly bigger than Obamacare, say others.
For Dave Johnson and Richard Eskow, both from the Campaign for America's Future, the larger budget war in Congress--in which the fight over Obamacare and the debt ceiling are battles--simply exposes just how radical and extreme the Republican Party has become in recent years.
"Forget the debt ceiling for a moment, if you can," wrote Eskow just ahead of Friday's vote. "Forget the GOP's attempt to shut down the government over the Affordable Care Act. Who is going to explain to the American people how profoundly misguided, and even immoral, the Republicans' entire economic agenda has become?"
Johnson says that a look at the budget that the House Republicans passed this morning expresses much more about the current GOP agenda than their well-documented hatred for Obama's healthcare law:
The budget in this resolution would be devastating to the economy, especially on top of the cuts that have already hurt the economy and crippled the recovery. A government shutdown would also be devastating to the economy. But even the threat itself hurts the economy, as people and companies pull back and hold off as they wait to see what happens. Past budget fights have proven this - bringing increases in unemployment and reductions in economic growth.
On top of this, Republicans are cutting $40 billion from the SNAP program. So on one hand, they propagandize that the "Obama economy" is hurting people, and then they cut assistance to the people who are hurting, claiming they don't really need it.
Probably at least 47 percent of Americans would be seriously hurt by either - but we already know how Republicans feel about 47 percent of Americans, don't we?
And Eskow adds:
If the GOP's Continuing Resolution is adopted, more cuts will follow: Head Start and the heating-assistance program will suffer further cuts. Education funds for low-income children and the disabled will be slashed. Not that the Republicans are entirely ungenerous: Their plan increases spending for defense by $20 billion, most of which will wind up in the pockets of wealthy defense contractors.
That's the cruelty in the Republican economic plan. Then there's the stupidity. The Congressional Budget Office has already estimated that sequestration cuts will cost the economy 900,000 jobs and shrink our national economy by 0.7 percent.
And what economist Dean Baker takes from a Congressional Budget Office report this week is that the austerity drive Republicans are calling for is exactly the wrong medicine that the ailing economy demands. The U.S. has as "a tax problem, not a spending problem" Baker concluded, explaining how the CBO report predicts a decline in healthcare costs in the coming years under the new law, while specifying that The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (in which Republicans negotiated to make permanent most of the Bush tax cuts) was the main cause for much of the projected fall in budget revenue.
Additionally, according to Johnson, if Republicans think their proposed austerity cuts are "necessary because of government deficits and debt," they clearly didn't see or ignored a "report released this week by the National Priorities Project [showing] that the country is handing more than $1 trillion per year to the already-wealthy."
But if Baker is correct and spending is not the problem, says Johnson, what the U.S. economy needs is "investment in infrastructure and education so our economy can thrive in the future, and we need stimulus now to get people working. If you want to worry about deficit and debt, then tax cuts are the problem."
Astride all this, however, continues to be what some describe as a "civil war" within the GOP. In this argument, what are described as "more moderate" members--specifically represented by Republicans in the Senate--are in a pitched internal battle of wills over political strategy, if not ideology, with what Krugman describes as the "Frankenstein-like monster" the GOP themselves created, otherwise known as the Tea Party.
Whether or not the narrative of this internal tension inside the GOP is accurate or not, what does seem clear to most observers is that the level of obstruction now in Washington has brought the legislative process to an almost complete halt.
Though some lawmakers might ultimately pay the price for their behavior at the hands of an increasingly frustrated public, in the meantime it will continue to be the American economy and the population at large made to suffer as the madness of the Republican Party looks to outshine all other performances in Washington over the coming days, weeks, and months.
____________________________________________________
Though the outcome of the vote was not a surprise, with the budget issue now heading to the Senate, the events on Capitol Hill over the budget further expose the "unprecedented" hostage-taking tactics of a Republican Party that has made economic denialism and political obstructionism its guiding principles since the current economic crisis began in late 2007 and which it has maintained throughout the Obama presidency.
"Forget the GOP's attempt to shut down the government over the Affordable Care Act. Who is going to explain to the American people how profoundly misguided, and even immoral, the Republicans' entire economic agenda has become?" -Richard Eskow, Campaign for America's Future
And even as many perceive a "civil war" within the Republican Party over how to deal with budget issues or battle their Democratic rivals, nothing in that narrative betrays the degree to which the GOP continues to march in lock-step when it comes to pushing austerity economic policies that insulate society's richest while pushing draconian cuts to programs and services that help workers, the elderly, the young, and the sick.
Calling it a "victory for America" and a "victory for common sense," Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) emerged after Friday's vote to celebrate the House budget resolution. He was greeted with cheers from his caucus members.
Critics and commentators, however, say the Republican obsession with defunding Obamacare (today's vote was their 42nd attempt to do so) and an expected repeat of the political battle over raising "the debt ceiling" (which could happen within a matter of weeks) are parts of a single ploy by the GOP to overcome their minority status in Washington by sabotaging the government's ability to accomplish almost anything.
As economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman writes:
...at the moment, it seems highly likely that the Republican Party will refuse to fund the government, forcing a shutdown at the beginning of next month, unless President Obama dismantles the health reform that is the signature achievement of his presidency. Republican leaders realize that this is a bad idea, but, until recently, their notion of preaching moderation was to urge party radicals not to hold America hostage over the federal budget so they could wait a few weeks and hold it hostage over the debt ceiling instead. Now they've given up even on that delaying tactic. The latest news is that John Boehner, the speaker of the House, has abandoned his efforts to craft a face-saving climbdown on the budget, which means that we're all set for shutdown, possibly followed by debt crisis.
And though many progressives may criticize Obamacare on their own terms--with many citing the blatant giveaway to private insurers embodied in the law and the failure of Democrats to embrace the idea of a single-payer, Medicare-for-all solution to the healthcare crisis--most also recognize that the legislation will, in fact, deliver positive improvements to vulnerable segments of the population, such as expanding the Medicaid program and limiting some of the worst abuses of the private insurers.
And Eugene Robinson, writing in the Washington Post, argues that even if the law is seriously flawed, "it would be wrong to let a bunch of extremist ideologues hold the country hostage in this manner."
"If Republicans want to repeal the reforms," Robinson continued, "they should win the Senate and the presidency. If not, they're welcome to pout and sulk all they want -- but not to use extortion to get their way."
But the problem is certainly bigger than Obamacare, say others.
For Dave Johnson and Richard Eskow, both from the Campaign for America's Future, the larger budget war in Congress--in which the fight over Obamacare and the debt ceiling are battles--simply exposes just how radical and extreme the Republican Party has become in recent years.
"Forget the debt ceiling for a moment, if you can," wrote Eskow just ahead of Friday's vote. "Forget the GOP's attempt to shut down the government over the Affordable Care Act. Who is going to explain to the American people how profoundly misguided, and even immoral, the Republicans' entire economic agenda has become?"
Johnson says that a look at the budget that the House Republicans passed this morning expresses much more about the current GOP agenda than their well-documented hatred for Obama's healthcare law:
The budget in this resolution would be devastating to the economy, especially on top of the cuts that have already hurt the economy and crippled the recovery. A government shutdown would also be devastating to the economy. But even the threat itself hurts the economy, as people and companies pull back and hold off as they wait to see what happens. Past budget fights have proven this - bringing increases in unemployment and reductions in economic growth.
On top of this, Republicans are cutting $40 billion from the SNAP program. So on one hand, they propagandize that the "Obama economy" is hurting people, and then they cut assistance to the people who are hurting, claiming they don't really need it.
Probably at least 47 percent of Americans would be seriously hurt by either - but we already know how Republicans feel about 47 percent of Americans, don't we?
And Eskow adds:
If the GOP's Continuing Resolution is adopted, more cuts will follow: Head Start and the heating-assistance program will suffer further cuts. Education funds for low-income children and the disabled will be slashed. Not that the Republicans are entirely ungenerous: Their plan increases spending for defense by $20 billion, most of which will wind up in the pockets of wealthy defense contractors.
That's the cruelty in the Republican economic plan. Then there's the stupidity. The Congressional Budget Office has already estimated that sequestration cuts will cost the economy 900,000 jobs and shrink our national economy by 0.7 percent.
And what economist Dean Baker takes from a Congressional Budget Office report this week is that the austerity drive Republicans are calling for is exactly the wrong medicine that the ailing economy demands. The U.S. has as "a tax problem, not a spending problem" Baker concluded, explaining how the CBO report predicts a decline in healthcare costs in the coming years under the new law, while specifying that The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (in which Republicans negotiated to make permanent most of the Bush tax cuts) was the main cause for much of the projected fall in budget revenue.
Additionally, according to Johnson, if Republicans think their proposed austerity cuts are "necessary because of government deficits and debt," they clearly didn't see or ignored a "report released this week by the National Priorities Project [showing] that the country is handing more than $1 trillion per year to the already-wealthy."
But if Baker is correct and spending is not the problem, says Johnson, what the U.S. economy needs is "investment in infrastructure and education so our economy can thrive in the future, and we need stimulus now to get people working. If you want to worry about deficit and debt, then tax cuts are the problem."
Astride all this, however, continues to be what some describe as a "civil war" within the GOP. In this argument, what are described as "more moderate" members--specifically represented by Republicans in the Senate--are in a pitched internal battle of wills over political strategy, if not ideology, with what Krugman describes as the "Frankenstein-like monster" the GOP themselves created, otherwise known as the Tea Party.
Whether or not the narrative of this internal tension inside the GOP is accurate or not, what does seem clear to most observers is that the level of obstruction now in Washington has brought the legislative process to an almost complete halt.
Though some lawmakers might ultimately pay the price for their behavior at the hands of an increasingly frustrated public, in the meantime it will continue to be the American economy and the population at large made to suffer as the madness of the Republican Party looks to outshine all other performances in Washington over the coming days, weeks, and months.
____________________________________________________
Democrats on the Joint Economic Committee said that "continued uncertainty" caused by the president's policies could reduce manufacturing investments by nearly half a trillion dollars by the end of this decade.
US President Donald Trump's tariff whiplash has already harmed domestic manufacturing and could continue to do so through at least the end of this decade to the tune of nearly half a trillion dollars, a report published Monday by congressional Democrats on a key economic committee warned.
The Joint Economic Committee (JEC)-Minority said that recent data belied Trump's claim that his global trade war would boost domestic manufacturing, pointing to the 37,000 manufacturing jobs lost since the president announced his so-called "Liberation Day" tariffs in April.
"Hiring in the manufacturing sector has dropped to its lowest level in nearly a decade," the Democrats on the committee wrote. "In addition, many experts have noted that in and of itself, the uncertainty created by the administration so far could significantly damage the broader economy long-term."
"Based on both US business investment projections and economic analyses of the UK in the aftermath of Brexit, the Joint Economic Committee-Minority calculates that a similarly prolonged period of uncertainty in the US could result in an average of 13% less manufacturing investment per year, amounting to approximately $490 billion in foregone investment by 2029," the report states.
"The uncertainty created by the administration so far could significantly damage the broader economy long-term."
"Although businesses have received additional clarity on reciprocal tariff rates in recent days, uncertainty over outstanding negotiations is likely to continue to delay long-term investments and pricing decisions," the publication adds. "Furthermore, even if the uncertainty about the US economy were to end tomorrow, evidence suggests that the uncertainty that businesses have already faced in recent months would still have long-term consequences for the manufacturing sector."
According to the JEC Democrats, the Trump administration has made nearly 100 different tariff policy decisions since April—"including threats, delays, and reversals"—creating uncertainty and insecurity in markets and economies around the world. It's not just manufacturing and markets—economic data released last week by the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that businesses in some sectors are passing the costs of Trump's tariffs on to consumers.
As the new JEC minority report notes:
As independent research has shown, businesses are less likely to make long-term investments when they face high uncertainty about future policies and economic conditions. For manufacturers, decisions to expand production—which often entail major, irreversible investments in equipment and new facilities that typically take years to complete—require an especially high degree of confidence that these expenses will pay off. This barrier, along with other factors, makes manufacturing the sector most likely to see its growth affected by trade policy uncertainty, as noted recently by analysts at Goldman Sachs.
"Strengthening American manufacturing is critical to the future of our economy and our national security," Joint Economic Committee Ranking Member Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) said in a statement Monday. "While President Trump promised that he would expand our manufacturing sector, this report shows that, instead, the chaos and uncertainty created by his tariffs has placed a burden on American manufacturers that could weigh our country down for years to come."
"Congressman Bresnahan didn't just vote to gut Pennsylvania hospitals. He looked out for his own bottom line before doing it," said one advocate.
Congressman Rob Bresnahan, a Republican who campaigned on banning stock trading by lawmakers only to make at least 626 stock trades since taking office in January, was under scrutiny Monday for a particular sale he made just before he voted for the largest Medicaid cut in US history.
Soon after a report showed that 10 rural hospitals in Bresnahan's state of Pennsylvania were at risk of being shut down, the congressman sold between $100,001 and $250,000 in bonds issued by the Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority for the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
The New York Times reported on the sale a month after it was revealed that Bresnahan sold up to $15,000 of stock he held in Centene Corporation, the largest Medicaid provider in the country. When President Donald Trump signed the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law last month, Centene's stock plummeted by 40%.
Bresnahan repeatedly said he would not vote to cut the safety net before he voted in favor of the bill.
The law is expected to cut $1 trillion from Medicaid over the next decade, with 10-15 million people projected to lose health coverage through the safety net program, according to one recent analysis. More than 700 hospitals, particularly those in rural areas, are likely to close due to a loss of Medicaid funding.
"His prolific stock trading is more than just a broken promise," said Cousin. "It's political malpractice and a scandal of his own making."
The economic justice group Unrig the Economy said that despite Bresnahan's introduction of a bill in May to bar members of Congress from buying and selling stocks—with the caveat that they could keep stocks they held before starting their terms in a blind trust—the congressman is "the one doing the selling... out of Pennsylvania hospitals."
"Congressman Bresnahan didn't just vote to gut Pennsylvania hospitals. He looked out for his own bottom line before doing it," said Unrig Our Economy campaign director Leor Tal. "Hospitals across Pennsylvania could close thanks to his vote, forcing families to drive long distances and experience longer wait times for critical care."
"Not everyone has a secret helicopter they can use whenever they want," added Tal, referring to recent reports that the multi-millionaire congressman owns a helicopter worth as much as $1.5 million, which he purchased through a limited liability company he set up.
Eli Cousin, a spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, told the Times that Bresnahan's stock trading "will define his time in Washington and be a major reason why he will lose his seat."
"His prolific stock trading is more than just a broken promise," said Cousin. "It's political malpractice and a scandal of his own making."
"If troops or federal agents violate our rights, they must be held accountable," the ACLU said.
As President Donald Trump escalates the US military occupation of Washington, DC—including by importing hundreds of out-of-state National Guard troops and allowing others to start carrying guns on missions in the nation's capital—the ACLU on Monday reminded his administration that federal forces are constitutionally obligated to protect, not violate, residents' rights.
"With additional state National Guard troops deploying to DC as untrained federal law enforcement agents perform local police duties in city streets, the American Civil Liberties Union is issuing a stark reminder to all federal and military officials that—no matter what uniform they wear or what authority they claim—they are bound by the US Constitution and all federal and local laws," the group said in a statement.
Over the weekend, the Republican governors of Ohio, South Carolina, and West Virginia announced that they are deploying hundreds of National Guard troops to join the 800 DC guardsmen and women recently activated by Trump, who also asserted federal control over the city's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD).
Sending military troops and heavily-armed federal agents to patrol the streets and scare vulnerable communities does not make us safer.
— ACLU (@aclu.org) August 18, 2025 at 12:08 PM
Trump dubiously declared a public safety emergency in a city where violent crime is down 26% from a year ago, when it was at its second-lowest level since 1966, according to official statistics. Critics have noted that Trump's crackdown isn't just targeting criminals, but also unhoused and mentally ill people, who have had their homes destroyed and property taken.
Contradicting assurances from military officials, The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that the newly deployed troops may be ordered to start carrying firearms. This, along with the president's vow to let police "do whatever the hell they want" to reduce crime in the city and other statements, have raised serious concerns of possible abuses.
"Through his manufactured emergency, President Trump is engaging in dangerous political theater to expand his power and sow fear in our communities," ACLU National Security Project director Hina Shamsi said Monday. "Sending heavily armed federal agents and National Guard troops from hundreds of miles away into our nation's capital is unnecessary, inflammatory, and puts people's rights at high risk of being violated."
Shamsi stressed that "federal agents and military troops are bound by the Constitution, including our rights to peaceful assembly, freedom of speech, due process, and safeguards against unlawful searches and seizures. If troops or federal agents violate our rights, they must be held accountable."
On Friday, the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration to block its order asserting federal authority over the MPD, arguing the move violated the Home Rule Act. U.S. Attorney General Bondi subsequently rescinded her order to replace DC Police Chief Pamela Smith with Drug Enforcement Administration Administrator Terry Cole.
Also on Friday, a group of House Democrats introduced a resolution to terminate Trump's emergency declaration.
The deployment of out-of-state National Guard troops onto our streets is a brazen abuse of power meant to create fear in the District.Join us in the fight for statehood to give D.C. residents the same guardrails against federal overreach as other states: dcstatehoodnow.org
[image or embed]
— ACLU of the District of Columbia (@aclu-dc.bsky.social) August 18, 2025 at 7:23 AM
ACLU of DC executive director Monica Hopkins argued Monday that there is a way to curb Trump's "brazen abuse of power" in the District.
"We need the nation to join us in the fight for statehood so that DC residents are treated like those in every other state and have the same guardrails against federal overreach," she said.