

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

A coalition of groups, including Demand Progress, have teamed up to create a Defund the NSA internet campaign urging citizens to contact and put pressure on their representatives to vote for the amendment and against the dragnet surveillance programs.
The petition by Demand Progress states, "As the NSA spying revelations continue to unfold, we increasingly find ourselves facing the reality that--at any moment--the federal government could be listening to our phone calls, watching our email traffic, keeping tabs on our Internet browsing, or worse."
"We have a chance of winning this vote," the group states, adding that at the very least the vote also presents the opportunity to get lawmakers on record. "We'll finally know who supports spying on Americans, and who opposes it," they state.
The amendment comes nearly six weeks after the Guardian newspaper began publishing information based on documents leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, which revealed previously unknown details about the extent of NSA spying and how it interprets domestic laws designed to govern such activities.
The amendment, introduced by Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI), is proposed for the Defense Appropriations Bill, which allocates taxpayer money for Pentagon and other military programs.
"In order for funds to be used by the NSA, the court order would have to have a statement limiting the collection of records to [the] records that pertain to a person under investigation," Amash explained during a House Rules Committee meeting Monday.
As the Electronic Frontier Foundation writes, "Passage of the Amash amendment would send a clear message to the NSA and other intelligence agencies that the heyday of unchecked dragnet surveillance is coming to at an end."
The summary of the amendment on the House of Representatives website says the provision,
Ends authority for the blanket collection of records under the Patriot Act. Bars the NSA and other agencies from using Section 215 of the Patriot Act to collect records, including telephone call records, that pertain to persons who are not subject to an investigation under Section 215.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) issued a joint statement Tuesday calling the amendment "unwise," adding to the growing chorus from Democrats and Republicans alike who openly support the NSA's vast spying programs.
_______________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

A coalition of groups, including Demand Progress, have teamed up to create a Defund the NSA internet campaign urging citizens to contact and put pressure on their representatives to vote for the amendment and against the dragnet surveillance programs.
The petition by Demand Progress states, "As the NSA spying revelations continue to unfold, we increasingly find ourselves facing the reality that--at any moment--the federal government could be listening to our phone calls, watching our email traffic, keeping tabs on our Internet browsing, or worse."
"We have a chance of winning this vote," the group states, adding that at the very least the vote also presents the opportunity to get lawmakers on record. "We'll finally know who supports spying on Americans, and who opposes it," they state.
The amendment comes nearly six weeks after the Guardian newspaper began publishing information based on documents leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, which revealed previously unknown details about the extent of NSA spying and how it interprets domestic laws designed to govern such activities.
The amendment, introduced by Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI), is proposed for the Defense Appropriations Bill, which allocates taxpayer money for Pentagon and other military programs.
"In order for funds to be used by the NSA, the court order would have to have a statement limiting the collection of records to [the] records that pertain to a person under investigation," Amash explained during a House Rules Committee meeting Monday.
As the Electronic Frontier Foundation writes, "Passage of the Amash amendment would send a clear message to the NSA and other intelligence agencies that the heyday of unchecked dragnet surveillance is coming to at an end."
The summary of the amendment on the House of Representatives website says the provision,
Ends authority for the blanket collection of records under the Patriot Act. Bars the NSA and other agencies from using Section 215 of the Patriot Act to collect records, including telephone call records, that pertain to persons who are not subject to an investigation under Section 215.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) issued a joint statement Tuesday calling the amendment "unwise," adding to the growing chorus from Democrats and Republicans alike who openly support the NSA's vast spying programs.
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

A coalition of groups, including Demand Progress, have teamed up to create a Defund the NSA internet campaign urging citizens to contact and put pressure on their representatives to vote for the amendment and against the dragnet surveillance programs.
The petition by Demand Progress states, "As the NSA spying revelations continue to unfold, we increasingly find ourselves facing the reality that--at any moment--the federal government could be listening to our phone calls, watching our email traffic, keeping tabs on our Internet browsing, or worse."
"We have a chance of winning this vote," the group states, adding that at the very least the vote also presents the opportunity to get lawmakers on record. "We'll finally know who supports spying on Americans, and who opposes it," they state.
The amendment comes nearly six weeks after the Guardian newspaper began publishing information based on documents leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, which revealed previously unknown details about the extent of NSA spying and how it interprets domestic laws designed to govern such activities.
The amendment, introduced by Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI), is proposed for the Defense Appropriations Bill, which allocates taxpayer money for Pentagon and other military programs.
"In order for funds to be used by the NSA, the court order would have to have a statement limiting the collection of records to [the] records that pertain to a person under investigation," Amash explained during a House Rules Committee meeting Monday.
As the Electronic Frontier Foundation writes, "Passage of the Amash amendment would send a clear message to the NSA and other intelligence agencies that the heyday of unchecked dragnet surveillance is coming to at an end."
The summary of the amendment on the House of Representatives website says the provision,
Ends authority for the blanket collection of records under the Patriot Act. Bars the NSA and other agencies from using Section 215 of the Patriot Act to collect records, including telephone call records, that pertain to persons who are not subject to an investigation under Section 215.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) issued a joint statement Tuesday calling the amendment "unwise," adding to the growing chorus from Democrats and Republicans alike who openly support the NSA's vast spying programs.
_______________________