

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"The bank should be held accountable" Ron Seifert, a spokesperson with Tar Sands Blockade, told Common Dreams Friday afternoon, confirming that the group was responsible for the action.
If TD Bank wants to be "as green as its logo," it "must immediately divest from tar sands exploitation and Keystone XL, which will have devastating climate impacts."
-Tar Sands BlockadeA press release issued Friday, purportedly from the bank, said that the institution was going to begin selling its $1.6 billion stake in the tar sands carrying pipeline and "other oil sands related ventures" following President Obama's recent climate speech and "increasing controversies and economic difficulties for Alberta's oil sands." It continued:
"Divesting from Keystone XL not only makes financial sense given the uncertainties surrounding the project, but it fits with out pledge to be 'As Green As Our Logo'," says TD Bank Environmental Director Diana Glassman.
"The short term dictates of the market and the concerns of our shareholders are of course the primary motivation behind the move away from oil sands, but thankfully, doing so will serve to protect other investments in the long term." says TD Chief Economist Craig Alexander, "Climate change is bad for business and economic stability in general, and the scientific community has been very clear about the climate change impacts of Alberta's oil sands."
The release was sent out and posted to yourtdbank.com, a site that appears to mirror the actual tdbank.com site.
Obviously getting some attention--perhaps including some praise for the recognizing the climate change impacts of the tar sands--TD Bank tweeted this morning:
The release duped a few news outlets temporarily, including the International Business Times.
EcoWatch, lamenting that the news turned out to be fake, wrote, "If only this were true...".
Yesterday, Seifert noted, the bank issued a release "bragging" it was working with the Nature Conservancy to protect 107 acres of forest--while at the same time fostering the plunder of a vastly larger area, an act that is "downright absurd and must be brought to light."
TD Bank, whose stated "goal is to be as green as our logo" is dishonest, said Seifert, and added in a statement later that to live up to this eco claim, the bank "must immediately divest from tar sands exploitation and Keystone XL, which will have devastating climate impacts."
The public should put pressure on the bank for "bankrolling the most ecologically devastating project on planet Earth"--something his group hopes will be helped today's hoax.
Note: This article has been updated to show that Tar Sands Blockade took responsibility for the action.
____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

"The bank should be held accountable" Ron Seifert, a spokesperson with Tar Sands Blockade, told Common Dreams Friday afternoon, confirming that the group was responsible for the action.
If TD Bank wants to be "as green as its logo," it "must immediately divest from tar sands exploitation and Keystone XL, which will have devastating climate impacts."
-Tar Sands BlockadeA press release issued Friday, purportedly from the bank, said that the institution was going to begin selling its $1.6 billion stake in the tar sands carrying pipeline and "other oil sands related ventures" following President Obama's recent climate speech and "increasing controversies and economic difficulties for Alberta's oil sands." It continued:
"Divesting from Keystone XL not only makes financial sense given the uncertainties surrounding the project, but it fits with out pledge to be 'As Green As Our Logo'," says TD Bank Environmental Director Diana Glassman.
"The short term dictates of the market and the concerns of our shareholders are of course the primary motivation behind the move away from oil sands, but thankfully, doing so will serve to protect other investments in the long term." says TD Chief Economist Craig Alexander, "Climate change is bad for business and economic stability in general, and the scientific community has been very clear about the climate change impacts of Alberta's oil sands."
The release was sent out and posted to yourtdbank.com, a site that appears to mirror the actual tdbank.com site.
Obviously getting some attention--perhaps including some praise for the recognizing the climate change impacts of the tar sands--TD Bank tweeted this morning:
The release duped a few news outlets temporarily, including the International Business Times.
EcoWatch, lamenting that the news turned out to be fake, wrote, "If only this were true...".
Yesterday, Seifert noted, the bank issued a release "bragging" it was working with the Nature Conservancy to protect 107 acres of forest--while at the same time fostering the plunder of a vastly larger area, an act that is "downright absurd and must be brought to light."
TD Bank, whose stated "goal is to be as green as our logo" is dishonest, said Seifert, and added in a statement later that to live up to this eco claim, the bank "must immediately divest from tar sands exploitation and Keystone XL, which will have devastating climate impacts."
The public should put pressure on the bank for "bankrolling the most ecologically devastating project on planet Earth"--something his group hopes will be helped today's hoax.
Note: This article has been updated to show that Tar Sands Blockade took responsibility for the action.
____________________

"The bank should be held accountable" Ron Seifert, a spokesperson with Tar Sands Blockade, told Common Dreams Friday afternoon, confirming that the group was responsible for the action.
If TD Bank wants to be "as green as its logo," it "must immediately divest from tar sands exploitation and Keystone XL, which will have devastating climate impacts."
-Tar Sands BlockadeA press release issued Friday, purportedly from the bank, said that the institution was going to begin selling its $1.6 billion stake in the tar sands carrying pipeline and "other oil sands related ventures" following President Obama's recent climate speech and "increasing controversies and economic difficulties for Alberta's oil sands." It continued:
"Divesting from Keystone XL not only makes financial sense given the uncertainties surrounding the project, but it fits with out pledge to be 'As Green As Our Logo'," says TD Bank Environmental Director Diana Glassman.
"The short term dictates of the market and the concerns of our shareholders are of course the primary motivation behind the move away from oil sands, but thankfully, doing so will serve to protect other investments in the long term." says TD Chief Economist Craig Alexander, "Climate change is bad for business and economic stability in general, and the scientific community has been very clear about the climate change impacts of Alberta's oil sands."
The release was sent out and posted to yourtdbank.com, a site that appears to mirror the actual tdbank.com site.
Obviously getting some attention--perhaps including some praise for the recognizing the climate change impacts of the tar sands--TD Bank tweeted this morning:
The release duped a few news outlets temporarily, including the International Business Times.
EcoWatch, lamenting that the news turned out to be fake, wrote, "If only this were true...".
Yesterday, Seifert noted, the bank issued a release "bragging" it was working with the Nature Conservancy to protect 107 acres of forest--while at the same time fostering the plunder of a vastly larger area, an act that is "downright absurd and must be brought to light."
TD Bank, whose stated "goal is to be as green as our logo" is dishonest, said Seifert, and added in a statement later that to live up to this eco claim, the bank "must immediately divest from tar sands exploitation and Keystone XL, which will have devastating climate impacts."
The public should put pressure on the bank for "bankrolling the most ecologically devastating project on planet Earth"--something his group hopes will be helped today's hoax.
Note: This article has been updated to show that Tar Sands Blockade took responsibility for the action.
____________________