SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Reprehensible, Reckless, Illegal': Washington Officials Slam Heroic NSA Surveillance Leaker
Calls to punish the whistleblower follow exposure of sweeping surveillance program
Jun 07, 2013
"Reprehensible." "Reckless." "Illegal."
These are the adjectives some officials in Washington are using to describe not the sweeping surveillance of Americans by the NSA revealed this week, but letting Americans know that such surveillance exists.
Speaking to CBS on Friday, WikiLeaks' Julian Assange said, "Let's ask ourselves whether the whistleblower who has revealed those, and there's more to come, is going to be in exactly the same position as Bradley Manning is in today."
Journalist and Guardian columnist Glenn Greenwald, part of the team that broke the stories, wrote on Friday of the courage of whistleblowers in the face of such intimidation:
Like puppets reading from a script, various Washington officials almost immediately began spouting all sorts of threats about "investigations" they intend to launch about these disclosures. This has been their playbook for several years now: they want to deter and intimidate anyone and everyone who might shed light on what they're doing with their abusive, manipulative exploitation of the power of law to punish those who bring about transparency.
That isn't going to work. It's beginning completely to backfire on them. It's precisely because such behavior reveals their true character, their propensity to abuse power, that more and more people are determined to bring about accountability and transparency for what they do.
They can threaten to investigate all they want. But as this week makes clear, and will continue to make clear, the ones who will actually be investigated are them.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said the revelations proved "we are a culture of leaks" and said there should be an investigation to find the source of the leak:
"The fact of the matter is, this was a routine three-month approval that was under seal that was leaked," Feinstein told MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell, who followed up by asking if the source of the leak should be investigated.
"I think so," Feinstein said. "I think we've become a culture of leaks now."
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said the leak was "reprehensible" and could cause "irreversible harm:"
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper called the disclosure of an Internet surveillance program "reprehensible" and said it risks Americans' security. He said a leak that revealed a program to collect phone records would affect how America's enemies behave and make it harder to understand their intentions.
"The unauthorized disclosure of a top secret U.S. court document threatens potentially long-lasting and irreversible harm to our ability to identify and respond to the many threats facing our nation," Clapper said in an unusual late-night statement.
An ABC News headline reads ominously: "On the Hunt for the NSA Wiretapping Leaker:"
"It's completely reckless and illegal... It's more than just unauthorized. He's no hero," one senior law enforcement source told ABC News of the unidentified leaker. The source speculated that a single person could be behind both recent leaks to the British newspaper The Guardian and to The Washington Post. [...]
"This guy's trying to be some kind of martyr," the law enforcement source said. [...]
If the leaker is in the government, former Deputy Director of the FBI Tim Muphy said he should be punished.
"You have an obligation when you have a clearance not to leak this kind of information," Murphy said.
At an event in San Jose, California on Friday, President Obama offered this blunt statment:
"I don't welcome leaks."
______________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
"Reprehensible." "Reckless." "Illegal."
These are the adjectives some officials in Washington are using to describe not the sweeping surveillance of Americans by the NSA revealed this week, but letting Americans know that such surveillance exists.
Speaking to CBS on Friday, WikiLeaks' Julian Assange said, "Let's ask ourselves whether the whistleblower who has revealed those, and there's more to come, is going to be in exactly the same position as Bradley Manning is in today."
Journalist and Guardian columnist Glenn Greenwald, part of the team that broke the stories, wrote on Friday of the courage of whistleblowers in the face of such intimidation:
Like puppets reading from a script, various Washington officials almost immediately began spouting all sorts of threats about "investigations" they intend to launch about these disclosures. This has been their playbook for several years now: they want to deter and intimidate anyone and everyone who might shed light on what they're doing with their abusive, manipulative exploitation of the power of law to punish those who bring about transparency.
That isn't going to work. It's beginning completely to backfire on them. It's precisely because such behavior reveals their true character, their propensity to abuse power, that more and more people are determined to bring about accountability and transparency for what they do.
They can threaten to investigate all they want. But as this week makes clear, and will continue to make clear, the ones who will actually be investigated are them.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said the revelations proved "we are a culture of leaks" and said there should be an investigation to find the source of the leak:
"The fact of the matter is, this was a routine three-month approval that was under seal that was leaked," Feinstein told MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell, who followed up by asking if the source of the leak should be investigated.
"I think so," Feinstein said. "I think we've become a culture of leaks now."
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said the leak was "reprehensible" and could cause "irreversible harm:"
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper called the disclosure of an Internet surveillance program "reprehensible" and said it risks Americans' security. He said a leak that revealed a program to collect phone records would affect how America's enemies behave and make it harder to understand their intentions.
"The unauthorized disclosure of a top secret U.S. court document threatens potentially long-lasting and irreversible harm to our ability to identify and respond to the many threats facing our nation," Clapper said in an unusual late-night statement.
An ABC News headline reads ominously: "On the Hunt for the NSA Wiretapping Leaker:"
"It's completely reckless and illegal... It's more than just unauthorized. He's no hero," one senior law enforcement source told ABC News of the unidentified leaker. The source speculated that a single person could be behind both recent leaks to the British newspaper The Guardian and to The Washington Post. [...]
"This guy's trying to be some kind of martyr," the law enforcement source said. [...]
If the leaker is in the government, former Deputy Director of the FBI Tim Muphy said he should be punished.
"You have an obligation when you have a clearance not to leak this kind of information," Murphy said.
At an event in San Jose, California on Friday, President Obama offered this blunt statment:
"I don't welcome leaks."
______________________________
"Reprehensible." "Reckless." "Illegal."
These are the adjectives some officials in Washington are using to describe not the sweeping surveillance of Americans by the NSA revealed this week, but letting Americans know that such surveillance exists.
Speaking to CBS on Friday, WikiLeaks' Julian Assange said, "Let's ask ourselves whether the whistleblower who has revealed those, and there's more to come, is going to be in exactly the same position as Bradley Manning is in today."
Journalist and Guardian columnist Glenn Greenwald, part of the team that broke the stories, wrote on Friday of the courage of whistleblowers in the face of such intimidation:
Like puppets reading from a script, various Washington officials almost immediately began spouting all sorts of threats about "investigations" they intend to launch about these disclosures. This has been their playbook for several years now: they want to deter and intimidate anyone and everyone who might shed light on what they're doing with their abusive, manipulative exploitation of the power of law to punish those who bring about transparency.
That isn't going to work. It's beginning completely to backfire on them. It's precisely because such behavior reveals their true character, their propensity to abuse power, that more and more people are determined to bring about accountability and transparency for what they do.
They can threaten to investigate all they want. But as this week makes clear, and will continue to make clear, the ones who will actually be investigated are them.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said the revelations proved "we are a culture of leaks" and said there should be an investigation to find the source of the leak:
"The fact of the matter is, this was a routine three-month approval that was under seal that was leaked," Feinstein told MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell, who followed up by asking if the source of the leak should be investigated.
"I think so," Feinstein said. "I think we've become a culture of leaks now."
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said the leak was "reprehensible" and could cause "irreversible harm:"
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper called the disclosure of an Internet surveillance program "reprehensible" and said it risks Americans' security. He said a leak that revealed a program to collect phone records would affect how America's enemies behave and make it harder to understand their intentions.
"The unauthorized disclosure of a top secret U.S. court document threatens potentially long-lasting and irreversible harm to our ability to identify and respond to the many threats facing our nation," Clapper said in an unusual late-night statement.
An ABC News headline reads ominously: "On the Hunt for the NSA Wiretapping Leaker:"
"It's completely reckless and illegal... It's more than just unauthorized. He's no hero," one senior law enforcement source told ABC News of the unidentified leaker. The source speculated that a single person could be behind both recent leaks to the British newspaper The Guardian and to The Washington Post. [...]
"This guy's trying to be some kind of martyr," the law enforcement source said. [...]
If the leaker is in the government, former Deputy Director of the FBI Tim Muphy said he should be punished.
"You have an obligation when you have a clearance not to leak this kind of information," Murphy said.
At an event in San Jose, California on Friday, President Obama offered this blunt statment:
"I don't welcome leaks."
______________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.