WikiLeaks Leaks Transcript of "Anti-WikiLeaks Documentary"
A day ahead of "We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks" opening, WikiLeaks releases annotated transcript to counter "factual errors and speculation"
WikiLeaks leaked an annotated transcript of the documentary "We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks," on Thursday, the eve of its opening, in an effort to "reveal errors and sleight of hand by the director Alex Gibney," the group writes.
In an introductory note to the transcript, WikiLeaks slams Gibney's film as an "anti-WikiLeaks documentary" that "is filled with factual errors and speculation."
"The film implies - erroneously and when evidence is to the contrary - that Assange may be guilty of 'conspiring' with Bradley Manning," they continue. "This not only factually incorrect, but also buys into the current US government position that journalists and publishers can be prosecuted as co-conspirators with their alleged sources or with whistleblowers who communicate information to them. This is a dangerous proposition for all journalists and media organizations -- not just WikiLeaks."
The criticism begins with the title of the film, which the groups says is "false" and "directly implies that WikiLeaks steals secrets. In fact, the statement is made by former CIA/NSA director Michael Hayden in relation to the activities of US government spies, not in relation to WikiLeaks. This an irresponsible libel. Not even critics in the film say that WikiLeaks steals secrets."
Further on, Wikileaks also criticizes the characterization of whistleblower Bradley Manning, who faces possible life in prison.
"Gibney establishes Manning's character in the context of an alleged gender confusion. This context is reinforced through constant repetition over the next few minutes of the film, in order to leave a lasting impression on the audience. This is Gibney's frame for Manning's alleged acts throughout the entire documentary: that his alleged acts represent a failure of character, rather than a triumph of conscience," WikiLeaks writes in the annotated transcript.
The filmmaker and WikiLeaks have been engaged in a back-and-forth on Twitter since the transcript leak, with the media organization repeatedly including the phrase "Facts matter" to counter Gibney's take. Gibney tweeted several times that the WikiLeaks transcript was incomplete, missing Bradley Manning's words.
"Neither Julian Assange nor anyone associated with WikiLeaks agreed to participate" in Gibney's film, they also point out, though they did cooperate with other documentaries set to be out this year, one by filmmaker Laura Poitras and another co-produced with Ken Loach's 16 Films.
___________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
WikiLeaks leaked an annotated transcript of the documentary "We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks," on Thursday, the eve of its opening, in an effort to "reveal errors and sleight of hand by the director Alex Gibney," the group writes.
In an introductory note to the transcript, WikiLeaks slams Gibney's film as an "anti-WikiLeaks documentary" that "is filled with factual errors and speculation."
"The film implies - erroneously and when evidence is to the contrary - that Assange may be guilty of 'conspiring' with Bradley Manning," they continue. "This not only factually incorrect, but also buys into the current US government position that journalists and publishers can be prosecuted as co-conspirators with their alleged sources or with whistleblowers who communicate information to them. This is a dangerous proposition for all journalists and media organizations -- not just WikiLeaks."
The criticism begins with the title of the film, which the groups says is "false" and "directly implies that WikiLeaks steals secrets. In fact, the statement is made by former CIA/NSA director Michael Hayden in relation to the activities of US government spies, not in relation to WikiLeaks. This an irresponsible libel. Not even critics in the film say that WikiLeaks steals secrets."
Further on, Wikileaks also criticizes the characterization of whistleblower Bradley Manning, who faces possible life in prison.
"Gibney establishes Manning's character in the context of an alleged gender confusion. This context is reinforced through constant repetition over the next few minutes of the film, in order to leave a lasting impression on the audience. This is Gibney's frame for Manning's alleged acts throughout the entire documentary: that his alleged acts represent a failure of character, rather than a triumph of conscience," WikiLeaks writes in the annotated transcript.
The filmmaker and WikiLeaks have been engaged in a back-and-forth on Twitter since the transcript leak, with the media organization repeatedly including the phrase "Facts matter" to counter Gibney's take. Gibney tweeted several times that the WikiLeaks transcript was incomplete, missing Bradley Manning's words.
"Neither Julian Assange nor anyone associated with WikiLeaks agreed to participate" in Gibney's film, they also point out, though they did cooperate with other documentaries set to be out this year, one by filmmaker Laura Poitras and another co-produced with Ken Loach's 16 Films.
___________________________
WikiLeaks leaked an annotated transcript of the documentary "We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks," on Thursday, the eve of its opening, in an effort to "reveal errors and sleight of hand by the director Alex Gibney," the group writes.
In an introductory note to the transcript, WikiLeaks slams Gibney's film as an "anti-WikiLeaks documentary" that "is filled with factual errors and speculation."
"The film implies - erroneously and when evidence is to the contrary - that Assange may be guilty of 'conspiring' with Bradley Manning," they continue. "This not only factually incorrect, but also buys into the current US government position that journalists and publishers can be prosecuted as co-conspirators with their alleged sources or with whistleblowers who communicate information to them. This is a dangerous proposition for all journalists and media organizations -- not just WikiLeaks."
The criticism begins with the title of the film, which the groups says is "false" and "directly implies that WikiLeaks steals secrets. In fact, the statement is made by former CIA/NSA director Michael Hayden in relation to the activities of US government spies, not in relation to WikiLeaks. This an irresponsible libel. Not even critics in the film say that WikiLeaks steals secrets."
Further on, Wikileaks also criticizes the characterization of whistleblower Bradley Manning, who faces possible life in prison.
"Gibney establishes Manning's character in the context of an alleged gender confusion. This context is reinforced through constant repetition over the next few minutes of the film, in order to leave a lasting impression on the audience. This is Gibney's frame for Manning's alleged acts throughout the entire documentary: that his alleged acts represent a failure of character, rather than a triumph of conscience," WikiLeaks writes in the annotated transcript.
The filmmaker and WikiLeaks have been engaged in a back-and-forth on Twitter since the transcript leak, with the media organization repeatedly including the phrase "Facts matter" to counter Gibney's take. Gibney tweeted several times that the WikiLeaks transcript was incomplete, missing Bradley Manning's words.
"Neither Julian Assange nor anyone associated with WikiLeaks agreed to participate" in Gibney's film, they also point out, though they did cooperate with other documentaries set to be out this year, one by filmmaker Laura Poitras and another co-produced with Ken Loach's 16 Films.
___________________________