SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rights Groups Slam House Passage of Privacy-Invading CISPA
Rights groups are slamming the House passage of the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) Thursday afternoon, a bill they say "undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users."
The bill received strong Republican support with 196 in favor and 29 opposing. But the bill also had the support of nearly half the Democratics, with 92 supporting the measure and 98 voting against it.
Apr 18, 2013
Rights groups are slamming the House passage of the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) Thursday afternoon, a bill they say "undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users."
The bill received strong Republican support with 196 in favor and 29 opposing. But the bill also had the support of nearly half the Democratics, with 92 supporting the measure and 98 voting against it.
As digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) describes it, CISPA "would allow companies to bypass all existing privacy law to spy on communications and pass sensitive user data to the government."
Explaining it further, Free Press' Josh Levy has written that
The new CISPA -- just like the old CISPA -- would protect companies like Facebook and Microsoft from legal liability when they hand over your sensitive online data to the federal government, without any regard for your privacy. The bill would permit the government -- including the National Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security -- to use that information for matters that have nothing to do with cybersecurity. The whole process would, of course, take place behind closed doors, with no accountability to the public.
The ACLU is also among the 34 civil liberties organizations and 74 Internet security experts and academics ushering warnings about CISPA.
"CISPA is an extreme proposal that allows companies that hold our very sensitive information to share it with any company or government entity they choose, even directly with military agencies like the NSA, without first stripping out personally identifiable information," Michelle Richardson, a legislative counsel at the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office, said in a statement following the House vote.
"This bill undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users," added Rainey Reitman, EFF Activism Director, on Thursday, and said EFF was "committed to taking this fight to the Senate."
President Obama has said he would veto the bill in its current form.
________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Rights groups are slamming the House passage of the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) Thursday afternoon, a bill they say "undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users."
The bill received strong Republican support with 196 in favor and 29 opposing. But the bill also had the support of nearly half the Democratics, with 92 supporting the measure and 98 voting against it.
As digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) describes it, CISPA "would allow companies to bypass all existing privacy law to spy on communications and pass sensitive user data to the government."
Explaining it further, Free Press' Josh Levy has written that
The new CISPA -- just like the old CISPA -- would protect companies like Facebook and Microsoft from legal liability when they hand over your sensitive online data to the federal government, without any regard for your privacy. The bill would permit the government -- including the National Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security -- to use that information for matters that have nothing to do with cybersecurity. The whole process would, of course, take place behind closed doors, with no accountability to the public.
The ACLU is also among the 34 civil liberties organizations and 74 Internet security experts and academics ushering warnings about CISPA.
"CISPA is an extreme proposal that allows companies that hold our very sensitive information to share it with any company or government entity they choose, even directly with military agencies like the NSA, without first stripping out personally identifiable information," Michelle Richardson, a legislative counsel at the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office, said in a statement following the House vote.
"This bill undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users," added Rainey Reitman, EFF Activism Director, on Thursday, and said EFF was "committed to taking this fight to the Senate."
President Obama has said he would veto the bill in its current form.
________________________
Rights groups are slamming the House passage of the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) Thursday afternoon, a bill they say "undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users."
The bill received strong Republican support with 196 in favor and 29 opposing. But the bill also had the support of nearly half the Democratics, with 92 supporting the measure and 98 voting against it.
As digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) describes it, CISPA "would allow companies to bypass all existing privacy law to spy on communications and pass sensitive user data to the government."
Explaining it further, Free Press' Josh Levy has written that
The new CISPA -- just like the old CISPA -- would protect companies like Facebook and Microsoft from legal liability when they hand over your sensitive online data to the federal government, without any regard for your privacy. The bill would permit the government -- including the National Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security -- to use that information for matters that have nothing to do with cybersecurity. The whole process would, of course, take place behind closed doors, with no accountability to the public.
The ACLU is also among the 34 civil liberties organizations and 74 Internet security experts and academics ushering warnings about CISPA.
"CISPA is an extreme proposal that allows companies that hold our very sensitive information to share it with any company or government entity they choose, even directly with military agencies like the NSA, without first stripping out personally identifiable information," Michelle Richardson, a legislative counsel at the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office, said in a statement following the House vote.
"This bill undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users," added Rainey Reitman, EFF Activism Director, on Thursday, and said EFF was "committed to taking this fight to the Senate."
President Obama has said he would veto the bill in its current form.
________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy