SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Image: Free Press
Rights Groups Slam House Passage of Privacy-Invading CISPA
Rights groups are slamming the House passage of the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) Thursday afternoon, a bill they say "undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users."
The bill received strong Republican support with 196 in favor and 29 opposing. But the bill also had the support of nearly half the Democratics, with 92 supporting the measure and 98 voting against it.
Apr 18, 2013
Rights groups are slamming the House passage of the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) Thursday afternoon, a bill they say "undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users."
The bill received strong Republican support with 196 in favor and 29 opposing. But the bill also had the support of nearly half the Democratics, with 92 supporting the measure and 98 voting against it.
As digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) describes it, CISPA "would allow companies to bypass all existing privacy law to spy on communications and pass sensitive user data to the government."
Explaining it further, Free Press' Josh Levy has written that
The new CISPA -- just like the old CISPA -- would protect companies like Facebook and Microsoft from legal liability when they hand over your sensitive online data to the federal government, without any regard for your privacy. The bill would permit the government -- including the National Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security -- to use that information for matters that have nothing to do with cybersecurity. The whole process would, of course, take place behind closed doors, with no accountability to the public.
The ACLU is also among the 34 civil liberties organizations and 74 Internet security experts and academics ushering warnings about CISPA.
"CISPA is an extreme proposal that allows companies that hold our very sensitive information to share it with any company or government entity they choose, even directly with military agencies like the NSA, without first stripping out personally identifiable information," Michelle Richardson, a legislative counsel at the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office, said in a statement following the House vote.
"This bill undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users," added Rainey Reitman, EFF Activism Director, on Thursday, and said EFF was "committed to taking this fight to the Senate."
President Obama has said he would veto the bill in its current form.
________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Rights groups are slamming the House passage of the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) Thursday afternoon, a bill they say "undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users."
The bill received strong Republican support with 196 in favor and 29 opposing. But the bill also had the support of nearly half the Democratics, with 92 supporting the measure and 98 voting against it.
As digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) describes it, CISPA "would allow companies to bypass all existing privacy law to spy on communications and pass sensitive user data to the government."
Explaining it further, Free Press' Josh Levy has written that
The new CISPA -- just like the old CISPA -- would protect companies like Facebook and Microsoft from legal liability when they hand over your sensitive online data to the federal government, without any regard for your privacy. The bill would permit the government -- including the National Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security -- to use that information for matters that have nothing to do with cybersecurity. The whole process would, of course, take place behind closed doors, with no accountability to the public.
The ACLU is also among the 34 civil liberties organizations and 74 Internet security experts and academics ushering warnings about CISPA.
"CISPA is an extreme proposal that allows companies that hold our very sensitive information to share it with any company or government entity they choose, even directly with military agencies like the NSA, without first stripping out personally identifiable information," Michelle Richardson, a legislative counsel at the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office, said in a statement following the House vote.
"This bill undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users," added Rainey Reitman, EFF Activism Director, on Thursday, and said EFF was "committed to taking this fight to the Senate."
President Obama has said he would veto the bill in its current form.
________________________
Rights groups are slamming the House passage of the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) Thursday afternoon, a bill they say "undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users."
The bill received strong Republican support with 196 in favor and 29 opposing. But the bill also had the support of nearly half the Democratics, with 92 supporting the measure and 98 voting against it.
As digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) describes it, CISPA "would allow companies to bypass all existing privacy law to spy on communications and pass sensitive user data to the government."
Explaining it further, Free Press' Josh Levy has written that
The new CISPA -- just like the old CISPA -- would protect companies like Facebook and Microsoft from legal liability when they hand over your sensitive online data to the federal government, without any regard for your privacy. The bill would permit the government -- including the National Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security -- to use that information for matters that have nothing to do with cybersecurity. The whole process would, of course, take place behind closed doors, with no accountability to the public.
The ACLU is also among the 34 civil liberties organizations and 74 Internet security experts and academics ushering warnings about CISPA.
"CISPA is an extreme proposal that allows companies that hold our very sensitive information to share it with any company or government entity they choose, even directly with military agencies like the NSA, without first stripping out personally identifiable information," Michelle Richardson, a legislative counsel at the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office, said in a statement following the House vote.
"This bill undermines the privacy of millions of Internet users," added Rainey Reitman, EFF Activism Director, on Thursday, and said EFF was "committed to taking this fight to the Senate."
President Obama has said he would veto the bill in its current form.
________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.