SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Climate Movement Claims 'Victory' After Direct Action Suit Dropped by Energy Giant
'Only a few of us went up that chimney but 64,000 people came down.'
Mar 13, 2013
In what climate justice activists are calling a "huge" victory, the UK energy giant EDF has dropped its controversial multi-million dollar lawsuit against activists who shut down one of the company's gas-fired power plants in 2012 with a dramatic week-long occupation of the plant's smoke chimney.
The lawsuit was withdrawn by EDF following a vibrant online campaign that motivated many of its customers to change, or threaten to change, their energy carriers. More than 64,000 people signed a Change.org petition which called for an end to the legal action against the No Dash for Gas activist group.
In part, the petition read:
England celebrates its right to peaceful protest. The abolition of slavery and women's suffrage are but two issues which have only come about through this means. We should be applauding and rewarding the group for their actions rather than allowing a multi-national organisation to put them in debt, possibly for the rest of their lives for a sum, which to EDF is a mere drop in the ocean, but well over a lifetime's income for them.
And it worked.
"A domineering company with an appalling record of pollution was trying to break the climate movement with a lawsuit they thought would silence opposition, but they failed." - Danielle Paffard, No Dash for Gas activist
"For all their power, for all their access and all their wealth, EDF's bullying lawsuit has bitten the dust because people power fought back," said 35 year-old Hannah Davey, one of the group's members named in the suit. "They thought they were taking on twenty-one of us, but they soon faced a movement that stood with us against an energy giant and its lawyers. This shows how powerful we are if we all stand together, if we organise and mobilise, if we refuse to back down in the face of the climate crisis."
"Only a few of us went up that chimney," she said, "but 64,000 people came down."
As the Guardian's James Ball reports:
EDF had said the action against the campaigners was necessary to ensure that others considering similar campaigns "understand that they may face consequences" for the cost and disruption they cause.
The activists [...] had occupied the site of a gas-fired power plant owned by EDF in West Burton, beginning last October. Several remained strapped to a cooling tower at the site for over a week, the longest such occupation in the UK.
EDF's claim against the activists said this action had caused damage in excess of PS5m, a figure that included staff and labour costs, delays to the completion of the station, specialist security and lost carbon emission credits.
But, now that the suit has been dropped, the No Dash for Gas group says their victory is EDF's "embarrassment"--one caused by the company's initial overreach and their subsequent "humiliating climb-down."
26 year-old Danielle Paffard, another No Dash for Gas campaigner, described the dropped suit as an "unmitigated defeat" for EDF.
"A domineering company with an appalling record of pollution was trying to break the climate movement with a lawsuit they thought would silence opposition, but they failed," she said. "Our campaign to expose the lie behind the new dash for gas will continue, with a growing movement and new allies."
Some of the globally recognized activists that came out in support of the activists were championing the news on Wednesday.
Canadian author and climate activist Naomi Klein tweeted:
And Friends of the Earth/UK showed their support with this message:
View the No Dash for Gas twitter profile:
And in this video, two of the No Dash for Gas activists describe why they shut down the EDF plant in the first place and the manner of the lawsuit levied against them:
_____________________________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In what climate justice activists are calling a "huge" victory, the UK energy giant EDF has dropped its controversial multi-million dollar lawsuit against activists who shut down one of the company's gas-fired power plants in 2012 with a dramatic week-long occupation of the plant's smoke chimney.
The lawsuit was withdrawn by EDF following a vibrant online campaign that motivated many of its customers to change, or threaten to change, their energy carriers. More than 64,000 people signed a Change.org petition which called for an end to the legal action against the No Dash for Gas activist group.
In part, the petition read:
England celebrates its right to peaceful protest. The abolition of slavery and women's suffrage are but two issues which have only come about through this means. We should be applauding and rewarding the group for their actions rather than allowing a multi-national organisation to put them in debt, possibly for the rest of their lives for a sum, which to EDF is a mere drop in the ocean, but well over a lifetime's income for them.
And it worked.
"A domineering company with an appalling record of pollution was trying to break the climate movement with a lawsuit they thought would silence opposition, but they failed." - Danielle Paffard, No Dash for Gas activist
"For all their power, for all their access and all their wealth, EDF's bullying lawsuit has bitten the dust because people power fought back," said 35 year-old Hannah Davey, one of the group's members named in the suit. "They thought they were taking on twenty-one of us, but they soon faced a movement that stood with us against an energy giant and its lawyers. This shows how powerful we are if we all stand together, if we organise and mobilise, if we refuse to back down in the face of the climate crisis."
"Only a few of us went up that chimney," she said, "but 64,000 people came down."
As the Guardian's James Ball reports:
EDF had said the action against the campaigners was necessary to ensure that others considering similar campaigns "understand that they may face consequences" for the cost and disruption they cause.
The activists [...] had occupied the site of a gas-fired power plant owned by EDF in West Burton, beginning last October. Several remained strapped to a cooling tower at the site for over a week, the longest such occupation in the UK.
EDF's claim against the activists said this action had caused damage in excess of PS5m, a figure that included staff and labour costs, delays to the completion of the station, specialist security and lost carbon emission credits.
But, now that the suit has been dropped, the No Dash for Gas group says their victory is EDF's "embarrassment"--one caused by the company's initial overreach and their subsequent "humiliating climb-down."
26 year-old Danielle Paffard, another No Dash for Gas campaigner, described the dropped suit as an "unmitigated defeat" for EDF.
"A domineering company with an appalling record of pollution was trying to break the climate movement with a lawsuit they thought would silence opposition, but they failed," she said. "Our campaign to expose the lie behind the new dash for gas will continue, with a growing movement and new allies."
Some of the globally recognized activists that came out in support of the activists were championing the news on Wednesday.
Canadian author and climate activist Naomi Klein tweeted:
And Friends of the Earth/UK showed their support with this message:
View the No Dash for Gas twitter profile:
And in this video, two of the No Dash for Gas activists describe why they shut down the EDF plant in the first place and the manner of the lawsuit levied against them:
_____________________________________________
In what climate justice activists are calling a "huge" victory, the UK energy giant EDF has dropped its controversial multi-million dollar lawsuit against activists who shut down one of the company's gas-fired power plants in 2012 with a dramatic week-long occupation of the plant's smoke chimney.
The lawsuit was withdrawn by EDF following a vibrant online campaign that motivated many of its customers to change, or threaten to change, their energy carriers. More than 64,000 people signed a Change.org petition which called for an end to the legal action against the No Dash for Gas activist group.
In part, the petition read:
England celebrates its right to peaceful protest. The abolition of slavery and women's suffrage are but two issues which have only come about through this means. We should be applauding and rewarding the group for their actions rather than allowing a multi-national organisation to put them in debt, possibly for the rest of their lives for a sum, which to EDF is a mere drop in the ocean, but well over a lifetime's income for them.
And it worked.
"A domineering company with an appalling record of pollution was trying to break the climate movement with a lawsuit they thought would silence opposition, but they failed." - Danielle Paffard, No Dash for Gas activist
"For all their power, for all their access and all their wealth, EDF's bullying lawsuit has bitten the dust because people power fought back," said 35 year-old Hannah Davey, one of the group's members named in the suit. "They thought they were taking on twenty-one of us, but they soon faced a movement that stood with us against an energy giant and its lawyers. This shows how powerful we are if we all stand together, if we organise and mobilise, if we refuse to back down in the face of the climate crisis."
"Only a few of us went up that chimney," she said, "but 64,000 people came down."
As the Guardian's James Ball reports:
EDF had said the action against the campaigners was necessary to ensure that others considering similar campaigns "understand that they may face consequences" for the cost and disruption they cause.
The activists [...] had occupied the site of a gas-fired power plant owned by EDF in West Burton, beginning last October. Several remained strapped to a cooling tower at the site for over a week, the longest such occupation in the UK.
EDF's claim against the activists said this action had caused damage in excess of PS5m, a figure that included staff and labour costs, delays to the completion of the station, specialist security and lost carbon emission credits.
But, now that the suit has been dropped, the No Dash for Gas group says their victory is EDF's "embarrassment"--one caused by the company's initial overreach and their subsequent "humiliating climb-down."
26 year-old Danielle Paffard, another No Dash for Gas campaigner, described the dropped suit as an "unmitigated defeat" for EDF.
"A domineering company with an appalling record of pollution was trying to break the climate movement with a lawsuit they thought would silence opposition, but they failed," she said. "Our campaign to expose the lie behind the new dash for gas will continue, with a growing movement and new allies."
Some of the globally recognized activists that came out in support of the activists were championing the news on Wednesday.
Canadian author and climate activist Naomi Klein tweeted:
And Friends of the Earth/UK showed their support with this message:
View the No Dash for Gas twitter profile:
And in this video, two of the No Dash for Gas activists describe why they shut down the EDF plant in the first place and the manner of the lawsuit levied against them:
_____________________________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.