As Climate Crisis Grows Urgent, New York Times Shutters 'Environment Desk'
Despite assurances from the paper, critics call decision "worrying"
With the world drowning in climate change related news--including 2012 as the hottest year on record and more extreme weather events and scientific studies than any single outlet could hope to cover--the New York Times has decided it's the perfect time to close its environment desk.
As Inside Climate News' Katherine Bagley reports:
The New York Times will close its environment desk in the next few weeks and assign its seven reporters and two editors to other departments. The positions of environment editor and deputy environment editor are being eliminated. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, which is edited from the environment desk.
Beth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, told Bagley that while solid environmental coverage doesn't necessarily require a dedicated team, the Times' decision is "worrying."
"Dedicated teams bring strength and consistency to the task of covering environment-related issues," she said. "It's always a huge loss to see them dismantled ... It's not necessarily a weakening to change organizational structure, but it does seem to be a bad sign. I will be watching closely what happens next."
Read Bagley's full coverage here.
Online reaction by many was swift, with the Guardian's environment editor John Vidal tweeting:
\u201cDumb move NYT. Sad end to top team of writers https://t.co/QGwZ4mu3\u201d— John Vidal (@John Vidal) 1357911481
And media critic and journalism professor Jay Rosen responded:
\u201cThe New York Times closes its environmental desk but says that this is in no way means less coverage of climate change. https://t.co/scaQ9QZt\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1357909884
And independent journalist and blogger Marcy Wheeler said:
\u201cShorter NYT: Environment stories no longer "fit to print." https://t.co/gR3dz8ju Cause they have to be business stories, not enviro stories.\u201d— emptywheel (@emptywheel) 1357909463
_________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
With the world drowning in climate change related news--including 2012 as the hottest year on record and more extreme weather events and scientific studies than any single outlet could hope to cover--the New York Times has decided it's the perfect time to close its environment desk.
As Inside Climate News' Katherine Bagley reports:
The New York Times will close its environment desk in the next few weeks and assign its seven reporters and two editors to other departments. The positions of environment editor and deputy environment editor are being eliminated. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, which is edited from the environment desk.
Beth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, told Bagley that while solid environmental coverage doesn't necessarily require a dedicated team, the Times' decision is "worrying."
"Dedicated teams bring strength and consistency to the task of covering environment-related issues," she said. "It's always a huge loss to see them dismantled ... It's not necessarily a weakening to change organizational structure, but it does seem to be a bad sign. I will be watching closely what happens next."
Read Bagley's full coverage here.
Online reaction by many was swift, with the Guardian's environment editor John Vidal tweeting:
\u201cDumb move NYT. Sad end to top team of writers https://t.co/QGwZ4mu3\u201d— John Vidal (@John Vidal) 1357911481
And media critic and journalism professor Jay Rosen responded:
\u201cThe New York Times closes its environmental desk but says that this is in no way means less coverage of climate change. https://t.co/scaQ9QZt\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1357909884
And independent journalist and blogger Marcy Wheeler said:
\u201cShorter NYT: Environment stories no longer "fit to print." https://t.co/gR3dz8ju Cause they have to be business stories, not enviro stories.\u201d— emptywheel (@emptywheel) 1357909463
_________________
With the world drowning in climate change related news--including 2012 as the hottest year on record and more extreme weather events and scientific studies than any single outlet could hope to cover--the New York Times has decided it's the perfect time to close its environment desk.
As Inside Climate News' Katherine Bagley reports:
The New York Times will close its environment desk in the next few weeks and assign its seven reporters and two editors to other departments. The positions of environment editor and deputy environment editor are being eliminated. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, which is edited from the environment desk.
Beth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, told Bagley that while solid environmental coverage doesn't necessarily require a dedicated team, the Times' decision is "worrying."
"Dedicated teams bring strength and consistency to the task of covering environment-related issues," she said. "It's always a huge loss to see them dismantled ... It's not necessarily a weakening to change organizational structure, but it does seem to be a bad sign. I will be watching closely what happens next."
Read Bagley's full coverage here.
Online reaction by many was swift, with the Guardian's environment editor John Vidal tweeting:
\u201cDumb move NYT. Sad end to top team of writers https://t.co/QGwZ4mu3\u201d— John Vidal (@John Vidal) 1357911481
And media critic and journalism professor Jay Rosen responded:
\u201cThe New York Times closes its environmental desk but says that this is in no way means less coverage of climate change. https://t.co/scaQ9QZt\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1357909884
And independent journalist and blogger Marcy Wheeler said:
\u201cShorter NYT: Environment stories no longer "fit to print." https://t.co/gR3dz8ju Cause they have to be business stories, not enviro stories.\u201d— emptywheel (@emptywheel) 1357909463
_________________