SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
As Climate Crisis Grows Urgent, New York Times Shutters 'Environment Desk'
Despite assurances from the paper, critics call decision "worrying"
Jan 11, 2013
With the world drowning in climate change related news--including 2012 as the hottest year on record and more extreme weather events and scientific studies than any single outlet could hope to cover--the New York Times has decided it's the perfect time to close its environment desk.
As Inside Climate News' Katherine Bagley reports:
The New York Times will close its environment desk in the next few weeks and assign its seven reporters and two editors to other departments. The positions of environment editor and deputy environment editor are being eliminated. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, which is edited from the environment desk.
Beth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, told Bagley that while solid environmental coverage doesn't necessarily require a dedicated team, the Times' decision is "worrying."
"Dedicated teams bring strength and consistency to the task of covering environment-related issues," she said. "It's always a huge loss to see them dismantled ... It's not necessarily a weakening to change organizational structure, but it does seem to be a bad sign. I will be watching closely what happens next."
Read Bagley's full coverage here.
Online reaction by many was swift, with the Guardian's environment editor John Vidal tweeting:
\u201cDumb move NYT. Sad end to top team of writers https://t.co/QGwZ4mu3\u201d— John Vidal (@John Vidal) 1357911481
And media critic and journalism professor Jay Rosen responded:
\u201cThe New York Times closes its environmental desk but says that this is in no way means less coverage of climate change. https://t.co/scaQ9QZt\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1357909884
And independent journalist and blogger Marcy Wheeler said:
\u201cShorter NYT: Environment stories no longer "fit to print." https://t.co/gR3dz8ju Cause they have to be business stories, not enviro stories.\u201d— emptywheel (@emptywheel) 1357909463
_________________
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
With the world drowning in climate change related news--including 2012 as the hottest year on record and more extreme weather events and scientific studies than any single outlet could hope to cover--the New York Times has decided it's the perfect time to close its environment desk.
As Inside Climate News' Katherine Bagley reports:
The New York Times will close its environment desk in the next few weeks and assign its seven reporters and two editors to other departments. The positions of environment editor and deputy environment editor are being eliminated. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, which is edited from the environment desk.
Beth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, told Bagley that while solid environmental coverage doesn't necessarily require a dedicated team, the Times' decision is "worrying."
"Dedicated teams bring strength and consistency to the task of covering environment-related issues," she said. "It's always a huge loss to see them dismantled ... It's not necessarily a weakening to change organizational structure, but it does seem to be a bad sign. I will be watching closely what happens next."
Read Bagley's full coverage here.
Online reaction by many was swift, with the Guardian's environment editor John Vidal tweeting:
\u201cDumb move NYT. Sad end to top team of writers https://t.co/QGwZ4mu3\u201d— John Vidal (@John Vidal) 1357911481
And media critic and journalism professor Jay Rosen responded:
\u201cThe New York Times closes its environmental desk but says that this is in no way means less coverage of climate change. https://t.co/scaQ9QZt\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1357909884
And independent journalist and blogger Marcy Wheeler said:
\u201cShorter NYT: Environment stories no longer "fit to print." https://t.co/gR3dz8ju Cause they have to be business stories, not enviro stories.\u201d— emptywheel (@emptywheel) 1357909463
_________________
With the world drowning in climate change related news--including 2012 as the hottest year on record and more extreme weather events and scientific studies than any single outlet could hope to cover--the New York Times has decided it's the perfect time to close its environment desk.
As Inside Climate News' Katherine Bagley reports:
The New York Times will close its environment desk in the next few weeks and assign its seven reporters and two editors to other departments. The positions of environment editor and deputy environment editor are being eliminated. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, which is edited from the environment desk.
Beth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, told Bagley that while solid environmental coverage doesn't necessarily require a dedicated team, the Times' decision is "worrying."
"Dedicated teams bring strength and consistency to the task of covering environment-related issues," she said. "It's always a huge loss to see them dismantled ... It's not necessarily a weakening to change organizational structure, but it does seem to be a bad sign. I will be watching closely what happens next."
Read Bagley's full coverage here.
Online reaction by many was swift, with the Guardian's environment editor John Vidal tweeting:
\u201cDumb move NYT. Sad end to top team of writers https://t.co/QGwZ4mu3\u201d— John Vidal (@John Vidal) 1357911481
And media critic and journalism professor Jay Rosen responded:
\u201cThe New York Times closes its environmental desk but says that this is in no way means less coverage of climate change. https://t.co/scaQ9QZt\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1357909884
And independent journalist and blogger Marcy Wheeler said:
\u201cShorter NYT: Environment stories no longer "fit to print." https://t.co/gR3dz8ju Cause they have to be business stories, not enviro stories.\u201d— emptywheel (@emptywheel) 1357909463
_________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.