SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
As Climate Crisis Grows Urgent, New York Times Shutters 'Environment Desk'
Despite assurances from the paper, critics call decision "worrying"
Jan 11, 2013
With the world drowning in climate change related news--including 2012 as the hottest year on record and more extreme weather events and scientific studies than any single outlet could hope to cover--the New York Times has decided it's the perfect time to close its environment desk.
As Inside Climate News' Katherine Bagley reports:
The New York Times will close its environment desk in the next few weeks and assign its seven reporters and two editors to other departments. The positions of environment editor and deputy environment editor are being eliminated. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, which is edited from the environment desk.
Beth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, told Bagley that while solid environmental coverage doesn't necessarily require a dedicated team, the Times' decision is "worrying."
"Dedicated teams bring strength and consistency to the task of covering environment-related issues," she said. "It's always a huge loss to see them dismantled ... It's not necessarily a weakening to change organizational structure, but it does seem to be a bad sign. I will be watching closely what happens next."
Read Bagley's full coverage here.
Online reaction by many was swift, with the Guardian's environment editor John Vidal tweeting:
And media critic and journalism professor Jay Rosen responded:
And independent journalist and blogger Marcy Wheeler said:
_________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
With the world drowning in climate change related news--including 2012 as the hottest year on record and more extreme weather events and scientific studies than any single outlet could hope to cover--the New York Times has decided it's the perfect time to close its environment desk.
As Inside Climate News' Katherine Bagley reports:
The New York Times will close its environment desk in the next few weeks and assign its seven reporters and two editors to other departments. The positions of environment editor and deputy environment editor are being eliminated. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, which is edited from the environment desk.
Beth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, told Bagley that while solid environmental coverage doesn't necessarily require a dedicated team, the Times' decision is "worrying."
"Dedicated teams bring strength and consistency to the task of covering environment-related issues," she said. "It's always a huge loss to see them dismantled ... It's not necessarily a weakening to change organizational structure, but it does seem to be a bad sign. I will be watching closely what happens next."
Read Bagley's full coverage here.
Online reaction by many was swift, with the Guardian's environment editor John Vidal tweeting:
And media critic and journalism professor Jay Rosen responded:
And independent journalist and blogger Marcy Wheeler said:
_________________
With the world drowning in climate change related news--including 2012 as the hottest year on record and more extreme weather events and scientific studies than any single outlet could hope to cover--the New York Times has decided it's the perfect time to close its environment desk.
As Inside Climate News' Katherine Bagley reports:
The New York Times will close its environment desk in the next few weeks and assign its seven reporters and two editors to other departments. The positions of environment editor and deputy environment editor are being eliminated. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, which is edited from the environment desk.
Beth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, told Bagley that while solid environmental coverage doesn't necessarily require a dedicated team, the Times' decision is "worrying."
"Dedicated teams bring strength and consistency to the task of covering environment-related issues," she said. "It's always a huge loss to see them dismantled ... It's not necessarily a weakening to change organizational structure, but it does seem to be a bad sign. I will be watching closely what happens next."
Read Bagley's full coverage here.
Online reaction by many was swift, with the Guardian's environment editor John Vidal tweeting:
And media critic and journalism professor Jay Rosen responded:
And independent journalist and blogger Marcy Wheeler said:
_________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy