Gitmo's "Improvised Justice" as Accused 9/11 Planner Dons "Prisoner of War" Attire
Court rulings for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Salim Hamdan expose trappings of military commision
Alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed appeared at the pretrial hearing on Wednesday dressed in a woodland camouflage vest over his white tunic. His change in attire came after Mohammed's lawyers argued that he considered himself a "prisoner of war" and, as the Los Angeles Times reported, because "he belonged to the mujahedeen militias that the United States financed to overthrow the Soviet-backed communist regime in Afghanistan, he was entitled to wear the camouflage."
The judge, Army Col. James Pohl, had ruled on Tuesday that he would allow Mohammed to wear the uniform as long as it did not include US military insignia or pose a security problem. "I mean, who really cares?" said the judge, though he had previously forbidden the garb.
Only Mohammed and another defendant--of the five facing trial--were present at the hearings on Wednesday after Pohl ruled earlier this week that defendants could voluntarily choose not to attend each day's proceedings, wrote AP.
The Judge told the courtroom Wednesday morning that he would rule on the protective order "probably later today." The classification is one of the primary issues being discussed during this week's pretrial, as it treats any discussion of what happened to the defendants during their torture and detention in CIA custody as a top national security secret.
Badly improvised charges, like improvised dress codes, are what you get when you choose a made-up pseudo-court with military trappings over the fairly solid civilian system we've built up over more than two centuries.
-The New Yorker's Amy Davidson
In a related matter, on Tuesday a Washington federal appeals court overturned the conviction of Salim Hamdan, former driver for Osama bin Laden. Hamdan had been serving a prison term for 'material support of terrorism.' According to AP, the appeals court ruling said, "material support for terrorism was not a war crime under international law at the time Hamdan engaged in the activity for which he was convicted." Hamdan--who has been in custody for six years--was sentenced to five and a half years and was, hence, released.
"If the government wanted to charge Hamdan with aiding and abetting terrorism or some other war crime that was sufficiently rooted in the international law of war at the time of Hamdan's conduct, it should have done so," wrote Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
The question remaining is whether or not the military commissions are capable of successfully trying these prisoners. Hamdan's ruling has drawn attention because it may dramatically affect other pending prosecutions of individuals charged under the Military Commissions Act of 2006.
New Yorker writer Amy Davidson writes:
Badly improvised charges, like improvised dress codes, are what you get when you choose a made-up pseudo-court with military trappings over the fairly solid civilian system we've built up over more than two centuries.
# # #
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed appeared at the pretrial hearing on Wednesday dressed in a woodland camouflage vest over his white tunic. His change in attire came after Mohammed's lawyers argued that he considered himself a "prisoner of war" and, as the Los Angeles Times reported, because "he belonged to the mujahedeen militias that the United States financed to overthrow the Soviet-backed communist regime in Afghanistan, he was entitled to wear the camouflage."
The judge, Army Col. James Pohl, had ruled on Tuesday that he would allow Mohammed to wear the uniform as long as it did not include US military insignia or pose a security problem. "I mean, who really cares?" said the judge, though he had previously forbidden the garb.
Only Mohammed and another defendant--of the five facing trial--were present at the hearings on Wednesday after Pohl ruled earlier this week that defendants could voluntarily choose not to attend each day's proceedings, wrote AP.
The Judge told the courtroom Wednesday morning that he would rule on the protective order "probably later today." The classification is one of the primary issues being discussed during this week's pretrial, as it treats any discussion of what happened to the defendants during their torture and detention in CIA custody as a top national security secret.
Badly improvised charges, like improvised dress codes, are what you get when you choose a made-up pseudo-court with military trappings over the fairly solid civilian system we've built up over more than two centuries.
-The New Yorker's Amy Davidson
In a related matter, on Tuesday a Washington federal appeals court overturned the conviction of Salim Hamdan, former driver for Osama bin Laden. Hamdan had been serving a prison term for 'material support of terrorism.' According to AP, the appeals court ruling said, "material support for terrorism was not a war crime under international law at the time Hamdan engaged in the activity for which he was convicted." Hamdan--who has been in custody for six years--was sentenced to five and a half years and was, hence, released.
"If the government wanted to charge Hamdan with aiding and abetting terrorism or some other war crime that was sufficiently rooted in the international law of war at the time of Hamdan's conduct, it should have done so," wrote Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
The question remaining is whether or not the military commissions are capable of successfully trying these prisoners. Hamdan's ruling has drawn attention because it may dramatically affect other pending prosecutions of individuals charged under the Military Commissions Act of 2006.
New Yorker writer Amy Davidson writes:
Badly improvised charges, like improvised dress codes, are what you get when you choose a made-up pseudo-court with military trappings over the fairly solid civilian system we've built up over more than two centuries.
# # #
Alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed appeared at the pretrial hearing on Wednesday dressed in a woodland camouflage vest over his white tunic. His change in attire came after Mohammed's lawyers argued that he considered himself a "prisoner of war" and, as the Los Angeles Times reported, because "he belonged to the mujahedeen militias that the United States financed to overthrow the Soviet-backed communist regime in Afghanistan, he was entitled to wear the camouflage."
The judge, Army Col. James Pohl, had ruled on Tuesday that he would allow Mohammed to wear the uniform as long as it did not include US military insignia or pose a security problem. "I mean, who really cares?" said the judge, though he had previously forbidden the garb.
Only Mohammed and another defendant--of the five facing trial--were present at the hearings on Wednesday after Pohl ruled earlier this week that defendants could voluntarily choose not to attend each day's proceedings, wrote AP.
The Judge told the courtroom Wednesday morning that he would rule on the protective order "probably later today." The classification is one of the primary issues being discussed during this week's pretrial, as it treats any discussion of what happened to the defendants during their torture and detention in CIA custody as a top national security secret.
Badly improvised charges, like improvised dress codes, are what you get when you choose a made-up pseudo-court with military trappings over the fairly solid civilian system we've built up over more than two centuries.
-The New Yorker's Amy Davidson
In a related matter, on Tuesday a Washington federal appeals court overturned the conviction of Salim Hamdan, former driver for Osama bin Laden. Hamdan had been serving a prison term for 'material support of terrorism.' According to AP, the appeals court ruling said, "material support for terrorism was not a war crime under international law at the time Hamdan engaged in the activity for which he was convicted." Hamdan--who has been in custody for six years--was sentenced to five and a half years and was, hence, released.
"If the government wanted to charge Hamdan with aiding and abetting terrorism or some other war crime that was sufficiently rooted in the international law of war at the time of Hamdan's conduct, it should have done so," wrote Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
The question remaining is whether or not the military commissions are capable of successfully trying these prisoners. Hamdan's ruling has drawn attention because it may dramatically affect other pending prosecutions of individuals charged under the Military Commissions Act of 2006.
New Yorker writer Amy Davidson writes:
Badly improvised charges, like improvised dress codes, are what you get when you choose a made-up pseudo-court with military trappings over the fairly solid civilian system we've built up over more than two centuries.
# # #