

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Beginning at noon today, a coalition of over a dozen environmental groups, progressive organizations, and socially minded businesses -- including 350.org, NRDC, Sierra Club, MoveOn.org and companies like Patagonia and Northface -- are launching a 24 hour "signature bomb" with the goal of sending the Senate over 500,000 messages opposing Keystone XL and urging Senators to block any amendments that reverse the President's pipeline rejection.
UPDATE: (4:35 PM EST) According to reports:
Senate Republicans officially filed an amendment Monday afternoon to the transportation bill that would authorize the Keystone XL pipeline. The amendment is sponsored by Sens. John Hoeven, Mitch McConnell, Richard Lugar, David Vitter, Mike Johanns and Orrin Hatch.
And 350.org reports:
Click here to add your name to our growing movement wide petition to stop Keystone XL -- there are over 300,000 signatures and counting: 350.org/kxl
Earlier:
The action has been planned to combat an expected amendment that could be added to the Senate transportation bill which will be under consideration over the next several days. If successfully tacked onto the Senate bill, the provision would force approval of the Keystone XL pipeline even after President Obama rejected it last month.
Bill McKibben from 350.org, on a press call this morning, said members of the coalition cannot hope to compete with the oil industry when it comes to campaign contributions to Senators and don't have illusions about a level playing field when it comes to money. "What we do have is numbers," he said. "What we do have is people who feel passionate about this issue. And in this fight 'money power' may find itself coming out on the short end of the stick against 'people power.'" Citing the political upheaval that has now been generated by the pipeline, McKibben credited the bold vision of activists, especially young people in his organization and others, in elevating the issue of global warming and climate change by challenging US energy policy. "We have spent our bodies. We have spent out time and energy," he said referencing previous actions at the White House and in local districts. "Now [with this action] we are spending our pixels and our keystrokes to get this message out."
Twitter updates show that the numbers are growing rapidly:
Suzanne Goldenberg, at The Guardian, reports this morning:
Some inflated estimates have put the number of pipeline jobs as high as 50,000; an analysis by the State Department, which oversaw the project, put the number at 5,000.
Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress are due on Monday to introduce a new measure that would force work to begin on the pipeline, essentially overturning the White House decision.
Republican Senators plan to file a measure on Monday that would link the pipeline project to a bill that would authorise more than $100bn in long-term transportation spending.
Michael Keischnick, from the CREDO Action network, described the battle of the Keystone XL pipeline as a very "clean line" for his members and that US Senators "would not get a bye" if they voted for an oil pipeline that would "despoil America in order to export dirty oil." Full development of the pipeline, he added, would "offset all the other gains" made by any of Obama's other environmental policies.
And Susan Casey-Lefkowitz, International Program Director at NRDC, called the Senate action a "political gambit" and that forcing congressional approval of a pipeline that the US State Department has found "not in the national interest" would be a clear sign that the Republicans and some Democrats continue "to play politics with dirty energy policies."
Take action here.
###
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Beginning at noon today, a coalition of over a dozen environmental groups, progressive organizations, and socially minded businesses -- including 350.org, NRDC, Sierra Club, MoveOn.org and companies like Patagonia and Northface -- are launching a 24 hour "signature bomb" with the goal of sending the Senate over 500,000 messages opposing Keystone XL and urging Senators to block any amendments that reverse the President's pipeline rejection.
UPDATE: (4:35 PM EST) According to reports:
Senate Republicans officially filed an amendment Monday afternoon to the transportation bill that would authorize the Keystone XL pipeline. The amendment is sponsored by Sens. John Hoeven, Mitch McConnell, Richard Lugar, David Vitter, Mike Johanns and Orrin Hatch.
And 350.org reports:
Click here to add your name to our growing movement wide petition to stop Keystone XL -- there are over 300,000 signatures and counting: 350.org/kxl
Earlier:
The action has been planned to combat an expected amendment that could be added to the Senate transportation bill which will be under consideration over the next several days. If successfully tacked onto the Senate bill, the provision would force approval of the Keystone XL pipeline even after President Obama rejected it last month.
Bill McKibben from 350.org, on a press call this morning, said members of the coalition cannot hope to compete with the oil industry when it comes to campaign contributions to Senators and don't have illusions about a level playing field when it comes to money. "What we do have is numbers," he said. "What we do have is people who feel passionate about this issue. And in this fight 'money power' may find itself coming out on the short end of the stick against 'people power.'" Citing the political upheaval that has now been generated by the pipeline, McKibben credited the bold vision of activists, especially young people in his organization and others, in elevating the issue of global warming and climate change by challenging US energy policy. "We have spent our bodies. We have spent out time and energy," he said referencing previous actions at the White House and in local districts. "Now [with this action] we are spending our pixels and our keystrokes to get this message out."
Twitter updates show that the numbers are growing rapidly:
Suzanne Goldenberg, at The Guardian, reports this morning:
Some inflated estimates have put the number of pipeline jobs as high as 50,000; an analysis by the State Department, which oversaw the project, put the number at 5,000.
Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress are due on Monday to introduce a new measure that would force work to begin on the pipeline, essentially overturning the White House decision.
Republican Senators plan to file a measure on Monday that would link the pipeline project to a bill that would authorise more than $100bn in long-term transportation spending.
Michael Keischnick, from the CREDO Action network, described the battle of the Keystone XL pipeline as a very "clean line" for his members and that US Senators "would not get a bye" if they voted for an oil pipeline that would "despoil America in order to export dirty oil." Full development of the pipeline, he added, would "offset all the other gains" made by any of Obama's other environmental policies.
And Susan Casey-Lefkowitz, International Program Director at NRDC, called the Senate action a "political gambit" and that forcing congressional approval of a pipeline that the US State Department has found "not in the national interest" would be a clear sign that the Republicans and some Democrats continue "to play politics with dirty energy policies."
Take action here.
###
Beginning at noon today, a coalition of over a dozen environmental groups, progressive organizations, and socially minded businesses -- including 350.org, NRDC, Sierra Club, MoveOn.org and companies like Patagonia and Northface -- are launching a 24 hour "signature bomb" with the goal of sending the Senate over 500,000 messages opposing Keystone XL and urging Senators to block any amendments that reverse the President's pipeline rejection.
UPDATE: (4:35 PM EST) According to reports:
Senate Republicans officially filed an amendment Monday afternoon to the transportation bill that would authorize the Keystone XL pipeline. The amendment is sponsored by Sens. John Hoeven, Mitch McConnell, Richard Lugar, David Vitter, Mike Johanns and Orrin Hatch.
And 350.org reports:
Click here to add your name to our growing movement wide petition to stop Keystone XL -- there are over 300,000 signatures and counting: 350.org/kxl
Earlier:
The action has been planned to combat an expected amendment that could be added to the Senate transportation bill which will be under consideration over the next several days. If successfully tacked onto the Senate bill, the provision would force approval of the Keystone XL pipeline even after President Obama rejected it last month.
Bill McKibben from 350.org, on a press call this morning, said members of the coalition cannot hope to compete with the oil industry when it comes to campaign contributions to Senators and don't have illusions about a level playing field when it comes to money. "What we do have is numbers," he said. "What we do have is people who feel passionate about this issue. And in this fight 'money power' may find itself coming out on the short end of the stick against 'people power.'" Citing the political upheaval that has now been generated by the pipeline, McKibben credited the bold vision of activists, especially young people in his organization and others, in elevating the issue of global warming and climate change by challenging US energy policy. "We have spent our bodies. We have spent out time and energy," he said referencing previous actions at the White House and in local districts. "Now [with this action] we are spending our pixels and our keystrokes to get this message out."
Twitter updates show that the numbers are growing rapidly:
Suzanne Goldenberg, at The Guardian, reports this morning:
Some inflated estimates have put the number of pipeline jobs as high as 50,000; an analysis by the State Department, which oversaw the project, put the number at 5,000.
Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress are due on Monday to introduce a new measure that would force work to begin on the pipeline, essentially overturning the White House decision.
Republican Senators plan to file a measure on Monday that would link the pipeline project to a bill that would authorise more than $100bn in long-term transportation spending.
Michael Keischnick, from the CREDO Action network, described the battle of the Keystone XL pipeline as a very "clean line" for his members and that US Senators "would not get a bye" if they voted for an oil pipeline that would "despoil America in order to export dirty oil." Full development of the pipeline, he added, would "offset all the other gains" made by any of Obama's other environmental policies.
And Susan Casey-Lefkowitz, International Program Director at NRDC, called the Senate action a "political gambit" and that forcing congressional approval of a pipeline that the US State Department has found "not in the national interest" would be a clear sign that the Republicans and some Democrats continue "to play politics with dirty energy policies."
Take action here.
###