SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
WikiLeaks Delivers Contribution to Bradley Manning Defense Fund
Website honours pledge made last July to help pay legal fees of soldier accused of leaking US embassy cables
Jan 13, 2011
WikiLeaks, the website that has published thousands of confidential US embassy cables, has donated $15,100 (PS9,500) to the legal defence fund of Bradley Manning, the soldier accused of handing providing it with the digital trove.
WikiLeaks had been coming under mounting criticism from Manning's supporters to honour a pledge made last July to take on board a substantial part of the financial burden of the soldier's defence. The fund is managed by Manning's Rhode Island-based lawyer, David Coombs.
Manning has been charged with the disclosure of unauthorised material and is expected to face an article 32 hearing - the preliminary military procedure ahead of a court martial - in March. He was arrested last May in Iraq, where he was stationed on intelligence duties, and has been kept in solitary confinement for the last five months in a military jail at the Quantico marine base, Virginia.
WikiLeaks' slow response in coming to the financial aid of its alleged source, who now faces up to 52 years in prison for having passed information to the website, has long been a cause of frustration for his supporters, although they have been hesitant to go public.
In the past the Bradley Manning Support Network has indicated that WikiLeaks had promised to pay up to $50,000 in legal fees, although that offer was reduced to $20,000 in December and the payment ended up being $15,000.
Part of the problem may be explained by WikiLeaks' own financial difficulties as a result of Visa, MasterCard and PayPal cutting off its accounts after pressure from the US government.
The support network calculates that the legal fund needs to have at least $115,000 to fight a vigorous defence. Including the WikiLeaks donation, it has collected more than $100,000.
Jeff Paterson, a member of the support network's steering committee, said the financial target had almost been met so the focus of the campaign would switch from fundraising to publicising what the treatment of Manning, which he said was inhumane.
"Internationally, people are speaking out against the unjust imprisonment of Bradley Manning, who is accused of acting out of moral conviction," Paterson said.
Manning is being held in solitary confinement under a prevention of injury order despite having been cleared by a military psychologist earlier this year.
David House, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher who is allowed to visit Manning, has reported a steady deterioration in his condition. Last month the UN office on torture announced it was launching an investigation into the soldier's treatment at Quantico.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
WikiLeaks, the website that has published thousands of confidential US embassy cables, has donated $15,100 (PS9,500) to the legal defence fund of Bradley Manning, the soldier accused of handing providing it with the digital trove.
WikiLeaks had been coming under mounting criticism from Manning's supporters to honour a pledge made last July to take on board a substantial part of the financial burden of the soldier's defence. The fund is managed by Manning's Rhode Island-based lawyer, David Coombs.
Manning has been charged with the disclosure of unauthorised material and is expected to face an article 32 hearing - the preliminary military procedure ahead of a court martial - in March. He was arrested last May in Iraq, where he was stationed on intelligence duties, and has been kept in solitary confinement for the last five months in a military jail at the Quantico marine base, Virginia.
WikiLeaks' slow response in coming to the financial aid of its alleged source, who now faces up to 52 years in prison for having passed information to the website, has long been a cause of frustration for his supporters, although they have been hesitant to go public.
In the past the Bradley Manning Support Network has indicated that WikiLeaks had promised to pay up to $50,000 in legal fees, although that offer was reduced to $20,000 in December and the payment ended up being $15,000.
Part of the problem may be explained by WikiLeaks' own financial difficulties as a result of Visa, MasterCard and PayPal cutting off its accounts after pressure from the US government.
The support network calculates that the legal fund needs to have at least $115,000 to fight a vigorous defence. Including the WikiLeaks donation, it has collected more than $100,000.
Jeff Paterson, a member of the support network's steering committee, said the financial target had almost been met so the focus of the campaign would switch from fundraising to publicising what the treatment of Manning, which he said was inhumane.
"Internationally, people are speaking out against the unjust imprisonment of Bradley Manning, who is accused of acting out of moral conviction," Paterson said.
Manning is being held in solitary confinement under a prevention of injury order despite having been cleared by a military psychologist earlier this year.
David House, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher who is allowed to visit Manning, has reported a steady deterioration in his condition. Last month the UN office on torture announced it was launching an investigation into the soldier's treatment at Quantico.
WikiLeaks, the website that has published thousands of confidential US embassy cables, has donated $15,100 (PS9,500) to the legal defence fund of Bradley Manning, the soldier accused of handing providing it with the digital trove.
WikiLeaks had been coming under mounting criticism from Manning's supporters to honour a pledge made last July to take on board a substantial part of the financial burden of the soldier's defence. The fund is managed by Manning's Rhode Island-based lawyer, David Coombs.
Manning has been charged with the disclosure of unauthorised material and is expected to face an article 32 hearing - the preliminary military procedure ahead of a court martial - in March. He was arrested last May in Iraq, where he was stationed on intelligence duties, and has been kept in solitary confinement for the last five months in a military jail at the Quantico marine base, Virginia.
WikiLeaks' slow response in coming to the financial aid of its alleged source, who now faces up to 52 years in prison for having passed information to the website, has long been a cause of frustration for his supporters, although they have been hesitant to go public.
In the past the Bradley Manning Support Network has indicated that WikiLeaks had promised to pay up to $50,000 in legal fees, although that offer was reduced to $20,000 in December and the payment ended up being $15,000.
Part of the problem may be explained by WikiLeaks' own financial difficulties as a result of Visa, MasterCard and PayPal cutting off its accounts after pressure from the US government.
The support network calculates that the legal fund needs to have at least $115,000 to fight a vigorous defence. Including the WikiLeaks donation, it has collected more than $100,000.
Jeff Paterson, a member of the support network's steering committee, said the financial target had almost been met so the focus of the campaign would switch from fundraising to publicising what the treatment of Manning, which he said was inhumane.
"Internationally, people are speaking out against the unjust imprisonment of Bradley Manning, who is accused of acting out of moral conviction," Paterson said.
Manning is being held in solitary confinement under a prevention of injury order despite having been cleared by a military psychologist earlier this year.
David House, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher who is allowed to visit Manning, has reported a steady deterioration in his condition. Last month the UN office on torture announced it was launching an investigation into the soldier's treatment at Quantico.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy