

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Iran has rejected Iraqi demands that it withdraw its soldiers from an oil well, the ownership of which is disputed by Baghdad.
Iran's Armed Forces Command issued a statement on Saturday making
clear that, in Tehran's view, there had been no incursion into Iraq as
the oil well is within Iranian borders.
"Our forces are on our own soil and, based on the known international borders, this well belongs to Iran," the statement said.
Iran has rejected Iraqi demands that it withdraw its soldiers from an oil well, the ownership of which is disputed by Baghdad.
Iran's Armed Forces Command issued a statement on Saturday making
clear that, in Tehran's view, there had been no incursion into Iraq as
the oil well is within Iranian borders.
"Our forces are on our own soil and, based on the known international borders, this well belongs to Iran," the statement said.
But the Iraqi government in Baghdad has demanded that "Tehran pull
back the armed men who occupied well No 4", condemning the incident as
"a violation of Iraqi sovereignty."
On
Friday, Iraq's state-owned South Oil Company in the southeastern city
of Amara said "an Iranian force arrived at the field ... it took
control of Well 4 and raised the Iranian flag even though the well lies
inside Iraqi territory."
Well 4 is in the al-Fauqa Field, part of a cluster of oilfields
which Iraq unsuccessfully put up for auction to oil majors in June. The
field has estimated reserves of 1.55 million barrels.
Incursion denied
Ramin Mehmanparast, an Iranian foreign ministry spokesman, accused
"external sources in Iraq" of working to damage relations between the
governments in Tehran and Baghdad, the official IRNA news agency
reported.
And a senior Iranian MP also tried to play down the dispute.
"The claim that Iran has occupied an Iraqi oil well is strongly
rejected," Alaeddin Borujerdi, head of parliament's national security
and foreign policy commission, told IRNA.
The issue was "being examined through diplomatic channels," he said, blaming "foreign media for such propaganda."
But Muhammad al-Hajj Hamud, Iraq's deputy foreign minister, rejected
Iranian claims on the well and called for an Iranian unit made up of
around a dozen soldiers and technicians to be withdrawn.
"We summoned Iran's ambassador to Baghdad yesterday [Friday] to tell
him that this attack is unacceptable and our ambassador to ehran
delivered a note to their foreign ministry to ask them to pull out
their troops," he said.
Hamud said it was the first time Well 4 had been taken over.
"In the past, the Iranians would try to prevent our technicians
from working on the well ... by firing in their direction," he said,
adding Iraq had dug the well in 1974.
Sovereignty dispute
The Iraqi official said the incident comes a month before a joint
commission starts work on demarcating the two countries' land and sea
border along the Shatt al-Arab waterway in the south.
Admiral Michael Mullen, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of
Staff, told reporters in Baghdad that as far as Washington was concered
"it's a sovereignty issue", adding that there were five other fields
under dispute.
And in southern Iraq, a US military spokesman told AFP that the
incident at Well 4 was the latest in a series of such activity along
the frontier.
"The oilfield is in disputed territory in between Iranian and Iraqi
border forts," said the officer at Contingency Operating Base Adder,
just outside the city of Nasiriyah. The well lies about 500
metres from an Iranian border fort and about one kilometre from an
Iraqi border fort, US Colonel Peter Newell said.
Source:
Agencies
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Iran has rejected Iraqi demands that it withdraw its soldiers from an oil well, the ownership of which is disputed by Baghdad.
Iran's Armed Forces Command issued a statement on Saturday making
clear that, in Tehran's view, there had been no incursion into Iraq as
the oil well is within Iranian borders.
"Our forces are on our own soil and, based on the known international borders, this well belongs to Iran," the statement said.
But the Iraqi government in Baghdad has demanded that "Tehran pull
back the armed men who occupied well No 4", condemning the incident as
"a violation of Iraqi sovereignty."
On
Friday, Iraq's state-owned South Oil Company in the southeastern city
of Amara said "an Iranian force arrived at the field ... it took
control of Well 4 and raised the Iranian flag even though the well lies
inside Iraqi territory."
Well 4 is in the al-Fauqa Field, part of a cluster of oilfields
which Iraq unsuccessfully put up for auction to oil majors in June. The
field has estimated reserves of 1.55 million barrels.
Incursion denied
Ramin Mehmanparast, an Iranian foreign ministry spokesman, accused
"external sources in Iraq" of working to damage relations between the
governments in Tehran and Baghdad, the official IRNA news agency
reported.
And a senior Iranian MP also tried to play down the dispute.
"The claim that Iran has occupied an Iraqi oil well is strongly
rejected," Alaeddin Borujerdi, head of parliament's national security
and foreign policy commission, told IRNA.
The issue was "being examined through diplomatic channels," he said, blaming "foreign media for such propaganda."
But Muhammad al-Hajj Hamud, Iraq's deputy foreign minister, rejected
Iranian claims on the well and called for an Iranian unit made up of
around a dozen soldiers and technicians to be withdrawn.
"We summoned Iran's ambassador to Baghdad yesterday [Friday] to tell
him that this attack is unacceptable and our ambassador to ehran
delivered a note to their foreign ministry to ask them to pull out
their troops," he said.
Hamud said it was the first time Well 4 had been taken over.
"In the past, the Iranians would try to prevent our technicians
from working on the well ... by firing in their direction," he said,
adding Iraq had dug the well in 1974.
Sovereignty dispute
The Iraqi official said the incident comes a month before a joint
commission starts work on demarcating the two countries' land and sea
border along the Shatt al-Arab waterway in the south.
Admiral Michael Mullen, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of
Staff, told reporters in Baghdad that as far as Washington was concered
"it's a sovereignty issue", adding that there were five other fields
under dispute.
And in southern Iraq, a US military spokesman told AFP that the
incident at Well 4 was the latest in a series of such activity along
the frontier.
"The oilfield is in disputed territory in between Iranian and Iraqi
border forts," said the officer at Contingency Operating Base Adder,
just outside the city of Nasiriyah. The well lies about 500
metres from an Iranian border fort and about one kilometre from an
Iraqi border fort, US Colonel Peter Newell said.
Source:
Agencies
Iran has rejected Iraqi demands that it withdraw its soldiers from an oil well, the ownership of which is disputed by Baghdad.
Iran's Armed Forces Command issued a statement on Saturday making
clear that, in Tehran's view, there had been no incursion into Iraq as
the oil well is within Iranian borders.
"Our forces are on our own soil and, based on the known international borders, this well belongs to Iran," the statement said.
But the Iraqi government in Baghdad has demanded that "Tehran pull
back the armed men who occupied well No 4", condemning the incident as
"a violation of Iraqi sovereignty."
On
Friday, Iraq's state-owned South Oil Company in the southeastern city
of Amara said "an Iranian force arrived at the field ... it took
control of Well 4 and raised the Iranian flag even though the well lies
inside Iraqi territory."
Well 4 is in the al-Fauqa Field, part of a cluster of oilfields
which Iraq unsuccessfully put up for auction to oil majors in June. The
field has estimated reserves of 1.55 million barrels.
Incursion denied
Ramin Mehmanparast, an Iranian foreign ministry spokesman, accused
"external sources in Iraq" of working to damage relations between the
governments in Tehran and Baghdad, the official IRNA news agency
reported.
And a senior Iranian MP also tried to play down the dispute.
"The claim that Iran has occupied an Iraqi oil well is strongly
rejected," Alaeddin Borujerdi, head of parliament's national security
and foreign policy commission, told IRNA.
The issue was "being examined through diplomatic channels," he said, blaming "foreign media for such propaganda."
But Muhammad al-Hajj Hamud, Iraq's deputy foreign minister, rejected
Iranian claims on the well and called for an Iranian unit made up of
around a dozen soldiers and technicians to be withdrawn.
"We summoned Iran's ambassador to Baghdad yesterday [Friday] to tell
him that this attack is unacceptable and our ambassador to ehran
delivered a note to their foreign ministry to ask them to pull out
their troops," he said.
Hamud said it was the first time Well 4 had been taken over.
"In the past, the Iranians would try to prevent our technicians
from working on the well ... by firing in their direction," he said,
adding Iraq had dug the well in 1974.
Sovereignty dispute
The Iraqi official said the incident comes a month before a joint
commission starts work on demarcating the two countries' land and sea
border along the Shatt al-Arab waterway in the south.
Admiral Michael Mullen, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of
Staff, told reporters in Baghdad that as far as Washington was concered
"it's a sovereignty issue", adding that there were five other fields
under dispute.
And in southern Iraq, a US military spokesman told AFP that the
incident at Well 4 was the latest in a series of such activity along
the frontier.
"The oilfield is in disputed territory in between Iranian and Iraqi
border forts," said the officer at Contingency Operating Base Adder,
just outside the city of Nasiriyah. The well lies about 500
metres from an Iranian border fort and about one kilometre from an
Iraqi border fort, US Colonel Peter Newell said.
Source:
Agencies